On Tue, 7 Jan 2020, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> What about the previous patch fixing the existing testism by skipping for
> big-endian arm using existing target supports?
I thought this was an update containing both - so yes, that's OK as well.
Richard.
> On 07/01/2020 07:31, Richard Biener
What about the previous patch fixing the existing testism by skipping
for big-endian arm using existing target supports?
On 07/01/2020 07:31, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, 13 Dec 2019, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
Consequently whilst looking at the list I noticed these two were missing.
This
On Fri, 13 Dec 2019, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> Consequently whilst looking at the list I noticed these two were missing.
>
> This OK for trunk?
Yes.
Thanks,
Richard.
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 2019-12-13 Andre Vieira
>
> * doc/sourcebuild.texi (arm_little_endian, arm_nothumb):
>
Consequently whilst looking at the list I noticed these two were missing.
This OK for trunk?
gcc/ChangeLog:
2019-12-13 Andre Vieira
* doc/sourcebuild.texi (arm_little_endian, arm_nothumb):
Documented existing target checks.
On 13/12/2019 13:05, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
Thanks for pointing it out Rainer. Thanks to that reminder I noticed
there is a different way to achieve this without adding that extra
target check.
This OK?
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2019-12-12 Andre Vieira
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-epilogues.c: XFAIL for arm big endian.
On 12/12/2019
Hi Andre,
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 2019-12-12 Andre Vieira
>
> * gcc.dg/vect/vect-epilogues.c: XFAIL for arm big endian.
> * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_arm_big_endian):
> New target selector.
as always, this needs documenting in
Yeah didn't test that, thanks.
This OK?
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2019-12-12 Andre Vieira
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-epilogues.c: XFAIL for arm big endian.
* lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_arm_big_endian):
New target selector.
On 12/12/2019 16:42,
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 at 12:27, Andre Vieira (lists)
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We can now vectorize an epilogue for this loop for arm too, so removing
> xfail.
>
> Is this OK for trunk? Wasn't entirely sure whether I could commit this
> under obvious.
>
This fails on armeb :-(
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
On December 11, 2019 12:27:31 PM GMT+01:00, "Andre Vieira (lists)"
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>We can now vectorize an epilogue for this loop for arm too, so removing
>
>xfail.
>
>Is this OK for trunk? Wasn't entirely sure whether I could commit this
>under obvious.
Sure.
Richard.
Hi,
We can now vectorize an epilogue for this loop for arm too, so removing
xfail.
Is this OK for trunk? Wasn't entirely sure whether I could commit this
under obvious.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2019-12-11 Andre Vieira
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-epilogues.c: Remove xfail for arm.
diff
10 matches
Mail list logo
