Hi!
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:54:31AM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > (Don't forget the changelog?)
>
> Thank you, Segher. Pushed to master, and for 8, 9 and 10.
Thanks!
> I did include the ChangeLog indeed. I tend to avoid sending them
> in the diff, because they usually don't apply out of
Hi Peter and Segher,
> > You should always CC the PPC maintainers on PPC patches.
> > I've CC'd both Segher and David.
Thanks a lot for doing that. And well understood for future patches.
> > >>> This commit adds a powerpc_vsx_ok dg-require-effective-target directive
> > >>> to that test, and
Hi!
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 09:46:15AM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 5/13/20 11:22 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > Would someone mind reviewing this patch, please?
> You should always CC the PPC maintainers on PPC patches.
> I've CC'd both Segher and David.
Thanks Peter. Yes, I hadn't seen
On 5/13/20 11:22 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Would someone mind reviewing this patch, please?
>
> The test explicitly uses -mvsx in the compilation options, so it seems
> reasonable to require powerpc_vsx_ok...
>
> Thank you!
You should always CC the PPC maintainers on PPC patches.
Hello,
Would someone mind reviewing this patch, please?
The test explicitly uses -mvsx in the compilation options, so it seems
reasonable to require powerpc_vsx_ok...
Thank you!
> Just a friendly ping on the following patch, hopefully sufficiently
> straightforward and tested to be allowed
Hello,
Just a friendly ping on the following patch, hopefully sufficiently
straightforward and tested to be allowed onto branch master.
Thank you!
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 04:49:47PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> From: Douglas Rupp
>
> Hello,
>
> (submitting this on behalf of Doug Rupp, one
