On May 16, 2012, at 03:10 , David Edelsohn wrote:
Okay.
revision 187581. Thanks!
Hello,
since you touch the SPE area would you mind looking at this PR:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47856
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Obere Lagerstr. 30, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 18 90 80 79-6
Fax : +49 89 18 90 80 79-9
E-Mail :
Hello David,
Back on this one after Alan's correction and extra testing of the
patch on my side.
On May 7, 2012, at 18:59 , David Edelsohn wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg01667.html
Yes, exactly. If we can work through the fallout, this is exactly the
type of cleanup
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Olivier Hainque hain...@adacore.com wrote:
config/rs6000:
* rs6000-opts.h (enum processor_type): Add PROCESSOR_PPC8548.
* rs6000-cpus.def: Reference it for cpu=8548.
* rs6000.md (cpu attribute definition): Add ppc8548.
*
Hello,
This is a followup on a discussion we had a while ago, starting with
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg01543.html
The original issue was the vxworks port unduly clobbering explicit
SPE related options on powerpc, which it still does. The proposed patch
at the time was to
On May 7, 2012, at 15:57 , Olivier Hainque wrote:
My first attempt at building there failed, with
--target=powerpc-eabispe --with-cpu=8548 --enable-languages=c
--disable-libada
(internal compiler error on unwind-dw2.c) This failure reproduces with
an unpatched tree as well, so
On Mon, 7 May 2012, Olivier Hainque wrote:
Joseph and David suggested to address this in a more general fashion,
along lines proposed in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg01667.html
The attached patch is a first shot in this direction. Only lightly tested
at this point,
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Mon, 7 May 2012, Olivier Hainque wrote:
Joseph and David suggested to address this in a more general fashion,
along lines proposed in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg01667.html
The attached
On May 7, 2012, at 18:59 , David Edelsohn wrote:
Yes, exactly. If we can work through the fallout, this is exactly the
type of cleanup I envisioned.
Great :)
Thanks, David
Do you want a PR for the fallout ? It is not related to this patch
at all. I can look into it further and make
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Olivier Hainque hain...@adacore.com wrote:
On May 7, 2012, at 18:59 , David Edelsohn wrote:
Yes, exactly. If we can work through the fallout, this is exactly the
type of cleanup I envisioned.
Great :)
Thanks, David
Do you want a PR for the fallout ? It
On May 7, 2012, at 21:27 , Olivier Hainque wrote:
Of course. That was actually my point in offering
to open a PR, so that Alan (who did the nice recent
reorg) can take it from there. He will certainly be
more efficient than me in resolving this :)
PR 53271
11 matches
Mail list logo
