David Edelsohn wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Two options, -mcmodel= and -mfpu=, had cases that fell through to the
next case without comments to indicate if this was intended. I added
comments to make the semantics explicit. Given the
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 10:08:24AM -0700, Michael Eager wrote:
David Edelsohn wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
Two options, -mcmodel= and -mfpu=, had cases that fell through to the
next case without comments to indicate if this was
On Thu, 5 May 2011, Michael Eager wrote:
David Edelsohn wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
Two options, -mcmodel= and -mfpu=, had cases that fell through to the
next case without comments to indicate if this was intended. I added
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 03:08:43PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
Yes, it was an error on my part. Sorry. I will fix the GCC 4.6 branch. I
will hold off fixing the on trunk, on the assumption this patch will go in. I
can fix it if desired.
I committed the following patch on the GCC 4.6
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 11:29:13AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
Alan, is mcmodel suppose to set m64?
No, that was an accident.
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Thu, 5 May 2011, Michael Eager wrote:
David Edelsohn wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
Two options, -mcmodel= and -mfpu=, had cases that fell through to
This patch implements the simpler parts of stopping
rs6000_handle_option from using global state. Many options are
converted to use .opt features such as Var and Enum, replacing
explicit code, while other code is changed to use the opts and
opts_set pointers. -mabi=, -mcpu= and -mtune= will be
