Seems like libstdc++.a has suffered a bit in the transition to a more
modular convenience-library build system.
Here's a patch to clean up the compatibility symbols throughout
libstdc++, to insure that necessary symbols for versioning purposes are
only in shared binaries, ie libstdc++.so. Most
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Sun, 25 Mar 2012, Marc Glisse wrote:
- a first goal is simple functions, with a single return statement (which
may even often be the only statement).
After playing with it a bit, I am not sure how to use it in the simple
forwarding case:
T
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi,
when testing a different patch of mine I hit the assert in
insert_clobbers_for_var which is there to make sure that there is a
call to builtin_stack_save in a BB with or dominating a call to
builtin_alloca_with_align. In my case that was not
Ping.
ludovic.cour...@inria.fr (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com skribis:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
The patch below solves the problem in a gfortran-specific way. WDYT?
I think that's the right approach for this issue.
The previous
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
Hi,
this is a regression present on the mainline and 4.7 branch for platforms
using
SJLJ exceptions, e.g. the ARM. The scenario is as follows: the main procedure
calls My_Iterators.Current which has a pragma Inline
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
Hi,
another kind of bit fields supported in Ada are floating-point bit fields.
They work fine, except that varasm.c rejects static constants (CONSTRUCTORs)
containing them. The attached patch plugs this hole.
I am playing with doing some internal interface static analysis
using the first patch below (and looking at LTO bootstrap results).
An example, obvious patch resulting from that is the 2nd patch,
resuling from the static analysis output
Hi,
Please find attached the patch resbank.patch which fixes the issue
with resbank attribute. Currently, registers used in the routine are
also saved on using resbank attribute. These registers are saved with
resbank instruction and need not be saved separately.
The patch fixes the issue.
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Sun, 25 Mar 2012, Marc Glisse wrote:
- a first goal is simple functions, with a single return statement (which
may even often be the only statement).
After playing with it a bit, I am not sure how to use it
On 03/28/2012 02:40 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
What about release branches? While this issue didn't trigger there
yet, it can be triggered by some bad RA decision, and the fixup is
missing.
I have no objection to your current patch being backported.
It looked fairly safe.
r~
Hi!
The recently added assert in mangle.c doesn't like mangling to be performed
during processing_template_decl. With #pragma weak foo we can hit it
unfortunately. This patch fixes that. Perhaps we could call
maybe_apply_pragma_weak from pt.c when instantiating, though not sure
how much useful
Hello,
I'd like to ping again those SMS patches once we're back to Stage 1.
Ayal, maybe it would remove some burden for you if you'd review the general
SMS functionality of those patches, and we'd ask RTL folks to look at the
pieces related to RTL pattern matching and generation?
Yours,
My merge from a few weeks ago accidentally trampled three patches by
Kai Teitz and Eric Botcazou from last month:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-02/msg00553.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-02/msg00524.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-02/msg01163.html
I've just
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.
Richard.
2012-03-29 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
* tree-flow.h (struct pre_expr_d): Remove forward declaration.
(add_to_value): Remove.
(print_value_expressions): Likewise.
*
Some more stuff. dse.c can probably be simplified with
dse_record_singleton_alias_set / dse_invalidate_singleton_alias_set
being removed.
LTO Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.
Richard.
2012-03-29 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
* cgraph.h
I am playing with doing some internal interface static analysis
using the first patch below (and looking at LTO bootstrap results).
An example, obvious patch resulting from that is the 2nd patch,
resuling from the static analysis output
On 03/08/2012 04:34 PM, Fabien Chêne wrote:
* decl.c (grokdeclarator): Call strip_using_decl.
I would think we ought to be stripping USING_DECLs at a lower level,
when we first look up the name in the parser. They shouldn't make it as
far as grokdeclarator.
Jason
List-initialization of an array of scalars is not considered a
user-defined conversion, so we need to check for it specifically to
avoid treating it as a standard conversion.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk and 4.7.
commit efaacb4065cce51b7374c31ddfb4682a880cbfc5
Author: Jason
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:54 AM, H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com wrote:
Hi,
This patch backports x32 support to libtool:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/libtool.git/commit/?id=88992fe6771ec3258bde1b03314ce579da0ac2d5
OK to install?
Thanks.
H.J.
---
ommit
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
Some more stuff. dse.c can probably be simplified with
dse_record_singleton_alias_set / dse_invalidate_singleton_alias_set
being removed.
Can we also make big functions much smaller? semi :-)
-- Gaby
On 03/29/2012 08:30 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
The recently added assert in mangle.c doesn't like mangling to be performed
during processing_template_decl. With #pragma weak foo we can hit it
unfortunately. This patch fixes that. Perhaps we could call
maybe_apply_pragma_weak from pt.c when
... attached the testsuite changes I have so far (seem all rather
straightforward to me).
Thanks,
Paolo.
Index: testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.eh/cleanup1.C
===
--- testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.eh/cleanup1.C
In this testcase, C has a base BU which is a non-dependent scope
because it is the current instantiation. But BU has a dependent base
ABU, so we need to be able to handle a non-dependent base that
itself has a dependent base.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk and 4.7.
commit
Frederic Riss sent me IRA dump files for an in-house GCC back-end which
helped to find a bug in coloring in presence of multi-register
allocnos. The bug resulted in making allocno colorable too earlier and
as a consequence in worse code. The problem was in preventing
processing of all
2012-02-27 Enkovich Ilya ilya.enkov...@intel.com
* gcc/config/i386/gnu-user.h (GNU_USER_TARGET_CC1_SPEC): New.
(CC1_SPEC): Use GNU_USER_TARGET_CC1_SPEC.
(GNU_USER_TARGET_LINK_SPEC): New.
(LINK_SPEC): Use GNU_USER_TARGET_LINK_SPEC.
Undef TARGET_OS_CPP_BUILTINS and define TARGET_OS_CPP_BUILTINS
in linux.h with GNU_USER_TARGET_OS_CPP_BUILTINS and
ANDROID_TARGET_OS_CPP_BUILTINS.
--
H.J.
Hello,
Here is a variant with linux.h modification. Does it look fine?
OK,
Honza
On 19.03.2012 17:38, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Andrew Stubbsa...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On 16/03/12 13:29, EXTERNAL Waechtler Peter (Fa. TCP, CM-AI/PJ-CF31) wrote:
The CodeSourcery toolchain contains a fix like the following,
please consider for adding it.
On 03/28/2012 06:40 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ /* 12.4/3 */
+ if (cxx_dialect= cxx0x
+ DECL_DESTRUCTOR_P (decl)
+ TYPE_RAISES_EXCEPTIONS (TREE_TYPE (old_decl)))
+ deduce_noexcept_on_destructor (decl);
The exception specification on old_decl
Hi,
this fixes the PR by checking for zero in check_default_argument and, in
case, replacing it with nullptr to avoid further warnings later on.
Should be safe enough for 4.7.1 too.
Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
/
/cp
2012-03-29 Paolo Carlini
Hi,
On 03/28/2012 06:40 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ /* 12.4/3 */
+ if (cxx_dialect= cxx0x
+ DECL_DESTRUCTOR_P (decl)
+ TYPE_RAISES_EXCEPTIONS (TREE_TYPE (old_decl)))
+deduce_noexcept_on_destructor (decl);
The exception specification on old_decl doesn't matter; we can drop
Hi,
On 03/28/2012 06:40 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ /* 12.4/3 */
+ if (cxx_dialect= cxx0x
+ DECL_DESTRUCTOR_P (decl)
+ TYPE_RAISES_EXCEPTIONS (TREE_TYPE (old_decl)))
+deduce_noexcept_on_destructor (decl);
The exception specification on old_decl doesn't matter; we can drop
On 03/29/2012 03:06 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
The exception specification on old_decl doesn't matter; we can drop
that test.
I seem to remember something going wrong with templates otherwise,
because implicitly_declare_fn has gcc_assert (!dependent_type_p (type));
We shouldn't be doing this
OK.
Jason
This is an updated version of a patch Debian and Ubuntu are using to
use an alternate linker path for hardfloat binaries. The difference
with this one is that it covers the case where no float flag
was passed in, defaulting to the softfloat path.
2012-03-29 dann frazier
On 03/29/2012 09:27 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 03/29/2012 03:06 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
The exception specification on old_decl doesn't matter; we can drop
that test.
I seem to remember something going wrong with templates otherwise,
because implicitly_declare_fn has gcc_assert
On 03/28/2012 09:10 AM, Ajinkya Dhobale wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Thank you for replying to the post.
How is this different than the function vector support that is
already in GCC for the H8/300 series processors?
Current H8/300 implementation of function vector seems inappropriate.
This patch fixes
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Therefore, an RFA for the attached patch. Bootstrappedtested on
powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK?
Ok.
Thanks. Committed as r185977.
Ciao!
Steven
This patch takes a different approach to fixing PR52543 than does the
patch in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-03/msg00641.html
This patch transforms the lower-subreg pass(es) from unconditionally
splitting wide moves, zero extensions, and shifts, so that it now takes
into account the
Naveen H. S navee...@kpitcummins.com wrote:
Please find attached the patch resbank.patch which fixes the issue
with resbank attribute. Currently, registers used in the routine are
also saved on using resbank attribute. These registers are saved with
resbank instruction and need not be saved
Hello!
My recent patch [1] exposed problem with avx_hplusminus_insnv4df3
AVX pattern. The pattern is defined in a wrong way, since the
components of the result should not cross 128bit lane boundary. This
is the cause of failures is [2]:
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx-vhaddpd-256-1.c execution test
On 03/29/2012 09:27 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 03/29/2012 03:06 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
The exception specification on old_decl doesn't matter; we can drop
that test.
I seem to remember something going wrong with templates otherwise,
because implicitly_declare_fn has gcc_assert
Subject:Support for Runtime CPU type detection via builtins
Hi,
I have made a new patch to only have two builtins :
* __builtin_cpu_is (CPUNAME)
* __builtin_cpu_supports (FEATURE)
apart from the cpu init builtin, __builtin_cpu_init.
List of CPU names :
* amd
* intel
* atom
* core2
*
Subject:Support for Runtime CPU type detection via builtins
Hi,
I have uploaded a new patch to only have two builtins :
* __builtin_cpu_is (CPUNAME)
* __builtin_cpu_supports (FEATURE)
apart from the cpu init builtin, __builtin_cpu_init.
List of CPU names :
* amd
* intel
* atom
* core2
*
On 03/26/2012 09:14 AM, Meador Inge wrote:
Hi All,
This patch fixes an ICE that occurs when attempting to fold nested
INDIRECT_REF
trees that have conversions in between the indirect references. For example:
constexpr unsigned long b = *((ul_ptr)(*((ul_ptr)0x0)));
What happens is
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 03:40:28PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, H.J. Lu wrote:
Here is the updated patch. I will wait for OK from Joseph.
I have no comments on this patch.
Given that my
Hello.
--
Regards,
niXman
libitm-mingw-detect.diff
Description: Binary data
Hi,
Please find attached the patch crt1.patch which fixes compilation
issue with sh2a-single-only target.
Currently, compilation generates the following error:-
merge of architecture 'sh3e' with architecture 'sh2a' produced unknown
architecture
The patch fixes the issue.
Tested with sh2a-elf.
This patch to the Go compiler fixes the order of evaluation of struct
composite literals. Previously the compiler assumed that all fields in
the struct were set in order. However, the composite literal might be
written differently. If the composite literal had function calls, Go
specifies that
48 matches
Mail list logo
