Hello,
fold-const contains quite few confused statements that deal with WEAK
visibility and aliases:
static int
simple_operand_p (const_tree exp)
{
/* Strip any conversions that don't change the machine mode. */
STRIP_NOPS (exp);
return (CONSTANT_CLASS_P (exp)
|| TREE_CODE
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
So, either we need something like the following patch (incremental), or
another possibility for the problem is not do the value.function.name
related change in module.c in the UDR patch, and instead fix up the UDR
combiner/initializer expressions when they are loaded from
On 2014/6/23 04:45 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Chung-Lin Tang clt...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
Hi Richard,
In this change:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg01278.html
where substitute_and_fold() was changed to use a dom walker, the calls
to purge
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:29 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
--- gcc/config/i386/driver-i386.c.jj2014-05-14 14:45:54.0
+0200
+++ gcc/config/i386/driver-i386.c 2014-06-20 18:59:57.805006358
+0200
@@ -745,6 +745,11 @@ const char *host_detect_local_cpu (int a
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hello,
fold-const contains quite few confused statements that deal with WEAK
visibility and aliases:
static int
simple_operand_p (const_tree exp)
{
/* Strip any conversions that don't change the machine mode. */
STRIP_NOPS (exp);
return
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Cong Hou wrote:
It has been 8 months since this patch is posted. I have addressed all
comments to this patch.
The SAD pattern is very useful for some multimedia algorithms like
ffmpeg. This patch will greatly improve the performance of such
algorithms. Could you please
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Bernd Edlinger
bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 19:12:47, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Bernd Edlinger
bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 10:40:53, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sun, Jun
Hi!
This patch fixes various issues with handling lastprivate and linear clauses
and simd collapse 1 loops.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, committed to trunk
and 4.9 branch.
2014-06-24 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
* gimplify.c (gimplify_omp_for): For
Hi,
vec_concat ( { a, b }, { c, d }) should give a new vector { a, b, c, d }.
On big-endian aarch64 targets, we have to think carefully about what this
means as we map GCC's view of endian-ness on to ours. GCC (for reasons I have
yet to understand) likes to describe lane-extracts from a vector
Hi,
This patch attempts to generate temporaries only when required.
I have changed generation of operand names. All children of an expr-node
are assigned at expr-node itself.
Names are generated as follows at expr-node:
olevelchild-pos = rhs;
where level is level of the expr-node in decision
On 23/06/14 22:12, Andrew Pinski wrote:
Hi,
When looking at the current conditional compare patch, I find that
we don't have a testcase to test that we don't ICE for the case where
we have conditional compares and conditional moves where the moves are
of floating point types.
This patch
Ping~
Original posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg01492.html
Thanks,
Yufeng
On 06/18/14 17:35, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
This time with patch... Apologize.
Yufeng
On 06/18/14 17:31, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
Hi,
This patch improves the code-gen of -marm in the case of
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 01:30:32PM +0100, Alan Lawrence wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/simd/ext_s64.x
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/simd/ext_s64.x
index
c71011a5157a207fe68fe814ed80658fd5e0f90f..b879fdacaa6544790e4d3ff98ca0055073d6d1d1
100644
---
Hi All,
Here is a fix for PR 61576 - additional test was added that block
containing reduction statement is predecessor of block containing phi
to choose the correct condition.
Bootstrap and regression testing did not show any new failures.
Is it OK for trunk?
gcc/ChangeLog
2014-06-24 Yuri
The following avoids to increase hard register lifetime by not
sinking loads from those.
Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, testing in progress.
I wonder if it would make sense to not treat hardregs as
memory but instead rewrite them into SSA form but with
SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This patch attempts to generate temporaries only when required.
I have changed generation of operand names. All children of an expr-node
are assigned at expr-node itself.
Names are generated as
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
[I'm at last back to this...]
With [1, -x + INF] as the resulting range? But it can be bogus if x is
itself equal to +INF (unlike the input range [x + 1, +INF] which is
always correct)
Hmm, indeed.
so this
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:24:26AM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
while updating vect_can_force_dr_alignment_p for section API I noticed the
predicate is bit confused about when it can update the alignment.
We need
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the review.
Please find attached updated patch after your review comments.
Changelog:
gcc/
* config/mips/mips.md (JOIN_MODE): New mode iterator.
(join2_load_StoreJOIN_MODE:mode): New pattern.
(join2_loadhi): Likewise.
(define_peehole2): Add
Hi,
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-03/msg00491.html changed the old
signed_type_for/unsigned_type_for functions and made them always return an
integer type, whereas they would previously leave integral types unchanged.
I don't see any justification for the latter and this has the
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Cong Hou co...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 4:04 AM, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Cong Hou wrote:
Given the following loop:
int a[N];
short b[N*2];
for (int i = 0; i N; ++i)
a[i] = b[i*2];
After being
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Cong Hou co...@google.com wrote:
Hi Richard
Could you please take a look at this patch and see if it is ready for
the trunk? The patch is pasted as a text file here again.
(found it)
The patch is ok for trunk. (please consider re-testing before you commit)
On Fri, 9 May 2014 17:33:41 +0100
Julian Brown jul...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Wed, 7 May 2014 09:41:27 -0600
Tom Tromey tro...@redhat.com wrote:
Tom The usual approach is some appropriate text somewhere on the
Tom GCC wiki (though I suppose a note in the mail archives would
Tom do in
On Thu, 29 May 2014 11:16:52 +0100
Julian Brown jul...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:47:54 +0100
Julian Brown jul...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:54:57 +0100
Paul Brook p...@codesourcery.com wrote:
But, that means EABI-conformant callers are also
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 20:23:27 +0100
Julian Brown jul...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Hi,
The print-sysroot-suffix.sh script that can be used (via the
t-sysroot-suffix makefile fragment) to auto-generate
the SYSROOT_SUFFIX_SPEC macro for non-trivial multilib setups does not
take into account the
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 12:42:36 +0100
Julian Brown jul...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Hi,
As discussed several times previously, support for NEON in ARM
big-endian mode is quite broken because of differing assumptions about
lane ordering made by the ARM EABI and the set of NEON intrinsics on
the
oops, didn't set plain text mode.
sorry for re-post.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch factors out checking expression-code in gimple-match-head.c
* gimple-match-head.c (check_gimple_assign): New function.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Bin Cheng bin.ch...@arm.com wrote:
Hi,
For below simplified case:
#define LEN (32000)
__attribute__((aligned(16))) float a[LEN],b[LEN];
int foo (int M)
{
for (int i = 0; i M; i++)
a[i+M] = a[i] + b[i];
}
Compiling it with command like:
$
Scan-assembler test was running with dg-do assemble and not generating any
assembler to scan.
Tested on aarch64-none-elf and aarch64_be-none-elf; 40 * UNRESOLVED-PASS tests
in singleton_intrinsics_1.c
Patch (below) committed as r211934.
--Alan
--
Index:
Braden,
Did you have a specific test case that causes this breakage? I have a
feeling that if we're missing base-link nodes in one place, we'll miss
them in others too.
Andrew
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Braden Obrzut ad...@maniacsvault.net wrote:
cp_maybe_constrained_type_specifier
Hi,
This patch series (2) implements zext/sext extension elimination using
value ranges stored in SSA. Implementation is what was suggested in the
thread https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-05/msg00213.html.
I have broken this into:
Patch 1 - Changes to store zero and sign extended promotions
Changes the the SUBREG flags to be able to set promoted for sign
(SRP_SIGNED), unsigned (SRP_UNSIGNED), sign and unsigned
(SPR_SIGNED_AND_UNSIGNED) in SUBREG_PROMOTED_VAR_P.
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/
2014-06-24 Kugan Vivekanandarajah kug...@linaro.org
* gcc/calls.c (precompute_arguments):
Sets proper flags on the SUBREG based on value
range info and enables elimination of zext/sext when possible.
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/
2014-06-24 Kugan Vivekanandarajah kug...@linaro.org
* gcc/calls.c (precompute_arguments: Check is_promoted_for_type
and set the promoted mode.
I saw this during bootstrap. I've verified that the patch works (I was
working on similar).
Ed
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 09:51:51PM +1000, Kugan wrote:
Changes the the SUBREG flags to be able to set promoted for sign
(SRP_SIGNED), unsigned (SRP_UNSIGNED), sign and unsigned
(SPR_SIGNED_AND_UNSIGNED) in SUBREG_PROMOTED_VAR_P.
2014-06-24 Kugan Vivekanandarajah kug...@linaro.org
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 09:53:35PM +1000, Kugan wrote:
2014-06-24 Kugan Vivekanandarajah kug...@linaro.org
* gcc/calls.c (precompute_arguments: Check is_promoted_for_type
and set the promoted mode.
(is_promoted_for_type) : New function.
(expand_expr_real_1) : Check
Committed as r211935. I updated the patch to add a more appropriate
comment and changelog entry.
Andrew
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland 3dw...@verizon.net wrote:
I saw this during bootstrap. I've verified that the patch works (I was
working on similar).
Ed
Index: parser.c
On 06/20/2014 12:52 PM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
This patch adds a hash_map class so we can consolidate the boiler plate around
using hash_table as a map, it also allows us to get rid of pointer_map which I
do in this patch by converting its
Hi Richard,
I have here part 1 of this patch, which does not use undefined behaviour.
Currently I start to think that also TYPE_SATURATING just cannot happen
here, because only some targets have saturating types, for instance ARM,
and also for those who have it, it is only allowed with fixed
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 02:29:53PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
On 06/20/2014 12:52 PM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
This patch adds a hash_map class so we can consolidate the boiler plate
around
using hash_table as a map, it also allows
Emit the proper module name in LIPO profile-use mode.
Passes regression tests, ok for google branches?
Thanks,
Teresa
2014-06-24 Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com
* coverage.c (emit_function_name): Emit module name in LIPO mode.
Index: coverage.c
On 06/24/2014 02:40 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 02:29:53PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
On 06/20/2014 12:52 PM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
This patch adds a hash_map class so we can consolidate the boiler plate around
Bother.
Apologies.
Simplest fix is to unshare the test body - patch attached; ok for trunk?
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/arm/simd/vexts64_1.c: Remove #include, inline test body.
* gcc.target/arm/simd/vextu64_1.c: Likewise.
*
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 03:17:46PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
On 06/24/2014 02:40 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 02:29:53PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
On 06/20/2014 12:52 PM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
This patch
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch factors out checking expression-code in gimple-match-head.c
* gimple-match-head.c (check_gimple_assign): New function.
(check_gimple_assign_convert): Likewise.
This adds infrastructure to create generic-match.c (empty for now).
Richard.
2014-06-24 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* Makefile.in (OBJS): Add generic-match.o.
(.PRECIOUS): Likewise.
(MOSTLYCLEANFILES): Add generic-match.c.
(generic-match.c): New rule.
Hi,
in this old rejects-valid we reject:
struct s
{
typedef void f(void);
f operator();
};
at the beginning of grokdeclarator:
if (((dname IDENTIFIER_OPNAME_P (dname)) || flags == TYPENAME_FLAG)
innermost_code != cdk_function
! (ctype !declspecs-any_specifiers_p))
OK.
Jason
This re-orders operands so we can default-initialize them to zero
now that we only have a single autogenerated function.
Richard.
2014-06-24 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* genmatch.c (write_fn_prototype): Remove and inline...
(decision_tree::gen_gimple): ...here.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
Hi,
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-03/msg00491.html changed the old
signed_type_for/unsigned_type_for functions and made them always return an
integer type, whereas they would previously leave integral types
This helps improve debug output. When pretty printing template args
including a placeholder, show placeholder instead of a dump_expr
error.
2014-06-24 Andrew Sutton andrew.n.sut...@gmail.com
* gcc/cp/error.C (dump_expr): Pretty print placeholder to improve
debug output.
Committed as
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:29 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
--- gcc/config/i386/driver-i386.c.jj2014-05-14 14:45:54.0
+0200
+++ gcc/config/i386/driver-i386.c 2014-06-20 18:59:57.805006358
On 06/23/2014 04:25 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
* class.c (check_methods, create_vtable_ptr, determine_key_method,
add_vcall_offset_vtbl_entries_1): Guard VINDEX checks by FUNCTION_DECL
check.
These changes are unnecessary: TYPE_METHODS is a list of functions.
The rest of the
Actually allow member concepts in using shorthand notation.
2014-06-24 Andrew Sutton andrew.n.sut...@gmail.com
* gcc/cp/parser.c (cp_maybe_constrained_type_specifier): Defer
handling the BASELINK check until concept-resolution in order to
allow member conceps.
I am still having problems doing a full build.
I get stuck on something that I think can't be a concepts problem in
gcc/config/i386/i386.c:
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/ed/obj_concepts/gcc'
/home/ed/obj_concepts/./prev-gcc/xg++
-B/home/ed/obj_concepts/./prev-gcc/
This massages things so GENERIC code-gen works (well, is emitted
and compiles). The GENERIC interface matches that of
fold_{unary,binary,ternary} with also supporting calls here.
It's supposed to be called at the start of those functions
(and if it returns NULL_TREE their remains is executed).
On Jun 24, 2014, at 2:08 AM, Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com wrote:
On 23/06/14 22:12, Andrew Pinski wrote:
Hi,
When looking at the current conditional compare patch, I find that
we don't have a testcase to test that we don't ICE for the case where
we have conditional compares
I'm not sure the warning is correct in any case...
In i386.h
struct stringop_algs
{
const enum stringop_alg unknown_size;
const struct stringop_strategy {
const int max;
const enum stringop_alg alg;
int noalign;
} size [MAX_STRINGOP_ALGS];
};
in i386.c
---
This fixes some warnings when building the library with -Wpedantic
(some only show up when also building with -Wsystem-headers).
Tested x86_64-linux, committed to trunk.
commit bf385e3ea2d8d10bdaa8e41c7638d32eb26b9bfd
Author: Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jun 24 14:16:28 2014
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
This massages things so GENERIC code-gen works (well, is emitted
and compiles). The GENERIC interface matches that of
fold_{unary,binary,ternary} with also supporting calls here.
It's supposed to be called at the start
Weird. Any chance you're doing a bootstrap build?
There was an earlier bootstrapping issue with this branch. We had
turned on -std=c++1y by default, and it was causing some conversion
errors with lvalue references to bitfields in libasan.
This doesn't *look* like a regression caused by concepts
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:11:32AM +0200, FX wrote:
Here?s a patch fixing the diff issue with configure.host and the doc (which
apparently is only triggered by some versions of texinfo).
Apart from that, functionnaly identical, so I?ll paste here the ?history? of
the patch:
This patch avoids multiple definitions of def_stmt in different
blocks, and moves it at
the beginning of gimple_match_and_simplify.
* genmatch.c (decision_tree::gen_gimple): Call fprintf to generate
definition of def_stmt.
(dt_operand::gen_gimple_expr): Adjust call to fprintf to generate
Trevor hrm, I know basically nothing about the upcoming changes, but I would
Trevor have expected linking c++03 code against c++11 code would be fine
Trevor especially when the interface doesn't involve any stl.
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Cxx11AbiCompatibility
This warns against mixing with
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 09:49:36AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
Not yet.
On i386-*-freebsd
In file included from ../../../gcc4x/libgfortran/runtime/fpu.c:29:0:
./fpu-target.h: In function 'set_fpu_trap_exceptions':
./fpu-target.h:31:3: error: unknown type name 'fp_except'
fp_except cw
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:12:38AM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
Trevor hrm, I know basically nothing about the upcoming changes, but I would
Trevor have expected linking c++03 code against c++11 code would be fine
Trevor especially when the interface doesn't involve any stl.
On 06/23/2014 04:25 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
* class.c (check_methods, create_vtable_ptr, determine_key_method,
add_vcall_offset_vtbl_entries_1): Guard VINDEX checks by FUNCTION_DECL
check.
These changes are unnecessary: TYPE_METHODS is a list of functions.
I just double checked
Hello,
this patch changes IPA REF API to c++ style. Changes were suggested and
consulted with Honza.
Patch has been pre approved, will be committed if no comments.
Bootstrapped on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, no regressions.
Thanks,
Martin
ChangeLog:
2014-06-22 Martin Liska
On 06/20/2014 12:52 PM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
This patch adds a hash_map class so we can consolidate the boiler plate
around
using hash_table as a map, it also allows us to get rid of pointer_map which
I
do in this patch by
The problem is that the patch fails testcases that assume we do such
folding at parsing
time.
./testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.dg/pr36901-1.c (test for excess errors)
./testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.dg/pr36901-2.c (test for excess errors)
./testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum:FAIL:
Steve Kargl wrote:
On FreeBSD (and perhaps other *BSD), there is no fpsetsticky(). The function
is fpresetsticky().
Solaris has fpsetsticky() (requires ieeefp.h) and BSD has
fpresetsticky() – thus, like at other places in that file, one needs to
conditionally enable one or the other.
In preparation to fix the alias issues on AIX, this patch changes
ASM_DECLARE_FUNCTION_NAME from a macro to a function.
Bootstrap on powerpc-ibm-aix7.1.0.0 in progress.
* config/rs6000/xcoff.h (ASM_DECLARE_FUNCTION_NAME): Remove definition
and call...
*
In preparation to fix the alias issues on AIX, this patch changes
ASM_DECLARE_FUNCTION_NAME from a macro to a function.
Thanks, David!
We will also need to introduce ASM_DECLARE_OBJECT_NAME to handle the aliases
of variables. I can look into that probably later this week (it is last week
of
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 08:23:49PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
On 06/20/2014 12:52 PM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
This patch adds a hash_map class so we can consolidate the boiler plate
around
using hash_table as a map, it also
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 08:34:23PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Steve Kargl wrote:
On FreeBSD (and perhaps other *BSD), there is no fpsetsticky(). The
function is fpresetsticky().
Solaris has fpsetsticky() (requires ieeefp.h) and BSD has
fpresetsticky() ? thus, like at other places in
On 06/20/14 01:51, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
IRA initialization shows high in profiles even when building lto objects. This
patch simply
delays RTL backend initialization until we really decide to output a function.
In some cases
this avoids the initialization completely (like in the case of
On 06/24/14, Andrew Sutton wrote:
Weird. Any chance you're doing a bootstrap build?
There was an earlier bootstrapping issue with this branch. We had
turned on -std=c++1y by default, and it was causing some conversion
errors with lvalue references to bitfields in libasan.
This doesn't
On June 24, 2014 9:16:34 PM CEST, Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 08:23:49PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
On 06/20/2014 12:52 PM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
This patch adds a hash_map class so we
Hi Honza,
On 23 Jun 2014, at 18:36, Jan Hubicka wrote:
The tests gcc.dg/globalalias-2.c and gcc.dg/localalias-2.c fail on darwin
with
/opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/globalalias-2.c:20:2: warning: alias
definitions not supported in Mach-O; ignored
I think they should be protected
We see the following on a 32bit gcc installed on 64 bit host:
Reading symbols from ./i586-pokymllib32-linux-gcc...done.
(gdb) run
Starting program:
x86-pokymllib32-linux/lib32-gcc/4.9.0-r0/image/usr/bin/i586-pokymllib32-linux-gcc
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
Sandra Loosemore san...@codesourcery.com writes:
On 05/14/2014 12:49 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Jeff Law l...@redhat.com writes:
On 05/13/14 14:11, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
2014-05-13 Catherine Moore c...@codesourcery.com
Sandra Loosemore san...@codesourcery.com
gcc/
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 03:35:01PM +0200, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Hi Martin,
Well actually, I am not sure if we ever wanted to have a race condition
here.
Have you seen any impact of --param allow-store-data-races on any
benchmark?
It's trivially to write one. The only pass that
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 09:43:06PM +0200, FX wrote:
Thanks for testing on a platform I don?t have access to! I try to
answer to the three main points below:
I suppose I don't understand the logic in libgfortran/configure.host.
It is picking the wrong config/fpu*.h file.
1. This is a
3. Does the attached updated patch (libgfortran only, without
regenerated files) fix the problem?
I'll test it when my regtesting is completed. But, a scan of
the configure.host re-arrangement suggests that it should work.
OK.
If you have some spare cycles, could you then also check it by
On 06/13/14 04:44, mliska wrote:
Hello,
this is core of IPA ICF patchset. It adds new pass and registers all needed
stuff related to a newly introduced interprocedural optimization.
Algorithm description:
In LGEN, we visit all read-only variables and functions. For each symbol, a
hash
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:26:27PM +0200, FX wrote:
3. Does the attached updated patch (libgfortran only, without
regenerated files) fix the problem?
I'll test it when my regtesting is completed. But, a scan of
the configure.host re-arrangement suggests that it should work.
OK.
Hi Trevor,
your recent commits have broken bootstrap for cygwin/mingw i386 targets with:
../../gcc/gcc/config/i386/winnt.c: In Funktion »unsigned int
i386_pe_section_type_flags(tree, const char*, int)«:
../../gcc/gcc/config/i386/winnt.c:503:61: Fehler: keine passende
Funktion für Aufruf von
* parser.c (cp_parser_elaborated_type_specifier): Only consider template
parameter lists outside of function parameter scope.
* g++.dg/cpp1y/pr61537.C: New testcase.
---
gcc/cp/parser.c | 28 +++-
Please don't ignore this, support for MIPS r5900 was already ignored for ~10
years. Just apply the patch when you don't know what I am talking about. The
fix for mips16 is very important. The patch has impact only on MIPS r5900.
Gesendet: Sonntag, 15. Juni 2014 um 22:08 Uhr
Von: Jürgen Urban
I think that was on purpose to avoid arithmetics in enum types. As those
conversions are useless and thus stripped later is it really important
to retain enum and boolean kind here?
The problem is that convert.c is called by front-ends and the patch also
removed the callback into them that
Hi,
this remained unresolved for a long time, but, if I understand correctly
Jason' Comment 1, should be rather easy, just do not complain for
uninitialized const members in aggregates, recursively too (per struct B
in the testcases). Does the below makes sense, then?!? It passes
testing,
... in order to handle correctly in C++98 mode (*) the case of
references in a member, I think we have to add an explicit check of
CLASSTYPE_REF_FIELDS_NEED_INIT, per the below.
Thanks,
Paolo.
(*) For C++11 my previous patch is fine, the TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE
(field)) == REFERENCE_TYPE check
Hi,
This patch removes unnecessary edge probability calculations in
afdo_propagate_circuit() that would eventually be overridden by
afdo_calculate_branch_prob().
This would pave the way for my next patch, which compares the
estimated branch probabilities or the branch annotations against the
OK for google-4_8 and google-4_9
Thanks,
Dehao
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Yi Yang ahyan...@google.com wrote:
Hi,
This patch removes unnecessary edge probability calculations in
afdo_propagate_circuit() that would eventually be overridden by
afdo_calculate_branch_prob().
This would
Matthew Fortune matthew.fort...@imgtec.com writes:
I suppose we'll need a way of specifying an isa_rev range, say
isa_rev=2-5. That should be a fairly localised change though.
There appear to be about 9 tests that are not fixed by educating mips.exp
about flags which are not supported on R6.
Hi,
On 06/24/2014 01:40 AM, Adam Butcher wrote:
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/pr61537.C
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+// PR c++/61537
+// { dg-do compile { target c++1y } }
I don't think this is a C++1y specific issue...
+// { dg-options }
Also, likely minor detail, could you please explain why you
On 2014-06-24 23:22, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 06/24/2014 01:40 AM, Adam Butcher wrote:
+// { dg-do compile { target c++1y } }
I don't think this is a C++1y specific issue...
You're right. I'm so used to creating pr testcases in that
g++.dg/cpp1y dir, I automatically added the test there
Part 1 of 4, split from the full patch. The purpose of this set of
changes is to remove assumptions in GCC about type sizes. Previous to
this patch, GCC assumed that all types were powers-of-two in size, and
used naive math accordingly.
Old:
POINTER_SIZE / BITS_PER_UNIT
Part 3 of 4, split from the full patch. Additional optimization
opportunity, since the MSP430 does a lot of conversions between HImode
and PSImode.
gcc/
* expr.c (convert_move): If the target has an explicit converter,
use it.
Index: gcc/expr.c
Part 4 of 4, split from the full patch. This is the MSP430-specific
use of the new intN framework to enable true 20-bit pointers. Since
I'm one of the MSP430 maintainers, this patch is being posted for
reference, not for approval.
gcc/config/msp430
* config/msp430/msp430-protos.h
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
