On 11/13/2014 09:34 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Um, surely not LOCK_SIZE, but CACHELINE_SIZE. It's the granularity of the
target region that's at issue, not the size of the lock itself.
The algorithm I've used is intentionally different from the pthreads-based
posix one...
All that would be
2014-11-14 9:49 GMT+03:00 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 11/06/14 05:10, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
This patch enables instrumentation of chosen builtin calls.
Thanks,
Ilya
--
2014-11-06 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
* ipa-chkp.c (chkp_versioning): Clone builtin
Hi,
Following the discussion here
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02237.html, this has been
tracked down to a range-checking bug with symbol + offset style
addressing with adrp where we allowed any arbitrary offset and this
would cause truncation of final addresses when
Hello Richard,
On 14 Nov 2014, at 08:01, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 11/13/2014 09:34 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Um, surely not LOCK_SIZE, but CACHELINE_SIZE. It's the granularity of the
target region that's at issue, not the size of the lock itself.
The algorithm I've used is intentionally
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Tejas Belagod tejas.bela...@arm.com wrote:
Hi,
Following the discussion here
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02237.html, this has been
tracked down to a range-checking bug with symbol + offset style addressing
with adrp where we allowed any
2014-11-14 9:43 GMT+03:00 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 11/06/14 04:48, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
--
2014-11-06 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
* tree-core.h (built_in_class): Add builtin codes to be used
by Pointer Bounds Checker for instrumented builtin functions.
On 11/14/2014 09:12 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
my locks are only 4 bytes [whereas they are
rounded-up-to-n-cachlines(sizeof(pthreads mutext)) for the posix
implementation].
The items that they are locking are of arbitrary size (at least up to one
page).
hmmm .. there's something I'm not
Hi!
I have some questions about nvptx:
1) you've said that alloca isn't supported, but it seems
to be wired up and uses the %alloca documented in the PTX
manual, what is the issue with that? %alloca not being actually
implemented by the current PTX assembler or translator? Or
some
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 08:56:53AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi!
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:44:40 -0800, Cesar Philippidis
ce...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On 11/13/2014 08:43 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Can you please avoid the TODOs in the source? If it is not the right
thing, either do
This merges a genmatch IL feature from the branch.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2014-11-14 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* genmatch.c (add_operator): Allow CONSTRUCTOR.
(dt_node::gen_kids): Handle CONSTRUCTOR not as GENERIC.
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Marek Polacek wrote:
As Richi pointed in the pr audit trail, instrumenting via folding is
bad. In this case we changed __builtin_unreachable, created by the
inliner, into BUILT_IN_UBSAN_HANDLE_BUILTIN_UNREACHABLE which requires
VOPS, which is a no-no in folding. So this
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Marek Polacek wrote:
Bootstrapped/regtested on power8-linux, ok for trunk?
Looks obvious ;)
Thanks,
Richard.
2014-11-13 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
* tree.c (build_common_builtin_nodes): Remove doubled ECF_LEAF.
diff --git gcc/tree.c gcc/tree.c
index
On 14 Nov 2014, at 08:25, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 11/14/2014 09:12 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
my locks are only 4 bytes [whereas they are
rounded-up-to-n-cachlines(sizeof(pthreads mutext)) for the posix
implementation].
The items that they are locking are of arbitrary size (at least up to
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
here is upated version with bitfields and also tested on PPC64-linux/aix.
I hacked configury to use system awk instead of gawk, so the changes are
hopefully safe.
OK?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
Honza
* optc-save-gen.awk: Output
On 14/11/14 08:19, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Tejas Belagod tejas.bela...@arm.com wrote:
Hi,
Following the discussion here
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02237.html, this has been
tracked down to a range-checking bug with symbol + offset style
On 29 October 2014 10:28, Zhenqiang Chen zhenqiang.c...@arm.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Richard Henderson [mailto:r...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 10:56 PM
To: Zhenqiang Chen
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Ping] [PATCH, 1/10] two hooks for
On 14 November 2014 08:19, Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Tejas Belagod tejas.bela...@arm.com wrote:
Hi,
Following the discussion here
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02237.html, this has been
tracked down to a range-checking bug with
On Nov 14, 2014, at 12:54 AM, Marcus Shawcroft marcus.shawcr...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 14 November 2014 08:19, Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Tejas Belagod tejas.bela...@arm.com
wrote:
Hi,
Following the discussion here
Hi Andrew,
On 14/11/14 00:56, Andrew Pinski wrote:
In ThunderX, any 1 cycle arthemantic instruction that produces the flags
register, will be fused with a branch. This patch depends on
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg01508.html.
Note I know bit 1 is going is already going to be
On 12 November 2014 16:46, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana.radhakrish...@arm.com wrote:
v2 , based on Richard's suggestion as well as fixing a bug that I hit in
some more testing at O1. aarch64_internal_mov_immediate should not generate
a temporary for subtarget when not actually generating code.
Hi!
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:33:13 +0100, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 08:56:53AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:44:40 -0800, Cesar Philippidis
ce...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On 11/13/2014 08:43 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Can you
The following patch merges binary patterns from the branch that
are exercised by fold_stmt and gimple_fold_stmt_to_constant in the
process of removing the dispatch of fold_binary from those.
I filed PR63862 for a C frontend bug which I noticed because of
fixing a fold bug which happily looked
On 11 November 2014 23:39, Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The problem here is that aarch64-builtins.c contains gty markers but
does not include gt-aarch64-builtins.h and is not included in the
target_gtfiles list in config.gcc. So sometimes the builtins get
garbage collected
On 13/11/14 17:42, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 11/13/2014 10:27 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 13/11/14 17:05, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Sandra Loosemore
san...@codesourcery.com wrote:
This patch to the AArch64 back end adds a couple of additional bics
On 13/11/14 22:44, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 11/13/2014 10:47 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Sandra Loosemore
san...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On 11/13/2014 10:27 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 13/11/14 17:05, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On 14/11/14 00:56, Andrew Pinski wrote:
In ThunderX, any 1 cycle arthemantic instruction that produces the flags
register, will be fused with a branch. This patch depends on
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 09:29:48AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
I have some questions about nvptx:
Oh, and
5) I have noticed gcc doesn't generate the .uni suffixes anywhere,
while llvm generates them; are those appropriate only when a function
is guaranteed to be run unconditionally from
Hi there,
Attached patch intends to fix a pattern that is found still non-UAL when do
gcc thumb-1 bootstrap. A test case is reduced and attached. Tested with gcc
regression test on pre-v6 thumb1 and v6 thumb1. No regression. Multilib can
be built for both of them.
Is it OK to trunk?
BR,
Terry
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Andres Tiraboschi
andres.tirabos...@tallertechnologies.com wrote:
Hi, this patch adds a new plugin event PLUGIN_START_FUNCTION and
PLUGIN_FINISH_FUNCTION that are invoked at start_function and finish_function
respectively in the C and C++ frontends.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2014-11-12 Martin Liska mli...@suse.cz
* Makefile.in: New object file is added.
* cgraph.h (symbol_table::allocate_cgraph_symbol): Summary UID
is filled up.
* cgraph_summary.c: New
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:15 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:02 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:42 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On
Hi!
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:21:47 +0100, I wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?keywords=openacc created.
Committed to gomp-4_0-branch in r217549:
commit 4a4f1ca48781ac08d2d51ba1a08210d8c8ca7528
Author: tschwinge tschwinge@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
Date: Fri Nov 14
On 11/14/2014 09:44 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
or do you think that a scheme to lock variable-sized chunks cannot work?
It certainly can't work while
+void
+libat_lock_1 (void *ptr)
+{
+ LockLock (locks[addr_hash (ptr, 1)]);
+}
doesn't have the true size.
r~
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/13/14 12:37, Mike Stump wrote:
I was doing a merge, and it failed to even compile the runtime
libraries due to checking in bitmap. bitmap goes to remove set bits
from the bitmap (the second hunk in a two hunk set), and it
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/13/14 08:28, David Malcolm wrote:
It was pointed out to me on IRC that I could instead use RAII for this,
so here's an alternative version of the patch that puts it in a class,
so that you can put:
auto_assert_no_gc
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:28:15AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
This patch is based on the last merge of trunk into gomp-4_0-branch,
9be82689 (trunk r216846, 2014-10-29), and still includes an old version
of the offloading patches, as currently present on gomp-4_0-branch.
We're already
Hi,
We currently do not set any interesting default values for jump and function
alignment in AArch64. I've made the formula for these values derive from
the issue rate of the processor as so:
jumps: 4 * processor issue-rate (rounded down to nearest power of two)
functions: 4 * processor
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:55 AM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
gengtype fails to create valid user marking functions for this type, which is
fixed by using vec here (which seems cleaner anyway).
bootstrapped + regtested powerpc64-linux (gcc
On 13 November 2014 21:44, Konstantin Serebryany
konstantin.s.serebry...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 05:35:48PM -0800, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
Here is one more merge of libsanitizer (last one was in Sept).
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:35 AM, James Greenhalgh
james.greenha...@arm.com wrote:
Hi,
We currently do not set any interesting default values for jump and function
alignment in AArch64. I've made the formula for these values derive from
the issue rate of the processor as so:
jumps: 4 *
These three are logically independent, but all on a common theme, and I've
tested them all together by
bootstrapped + check-gcc on aarch64-none-elf
cross-tested check-gcc on aarch64_be-none-elf
Ok for trunk?
I wonder how many other problems of this nature are lurking in reorg.c.
For example steal_delay_list_from_{target,fallthrough} or the code
which searches for arithmetic at the branch target, and puts the
opposite insn in a delay slot.
Right, and the latter has already been dealt with by
Now that float64x1_t is a vector, casting to it from a unit64_t causes the bit
pattern to be reinterpreted, just as vcreate_f64 should. (Previously when
float64x1_t was still a scalar, casting caused a conversion.) Hence, replace the
__builtin with a cast. None of the other variants of the
On 14/11/14 05:17, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/13/14 07:09, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
I've updated the documentation for the hook.
The testcase I was looking at involves fusing the AArch64 adrp+add
instructions and depends on the backend implementation of the matching
code, under review currently at
On 13 November 2014 06:14, Yangfei (Felix) felix.y...@huawei.com wrote:
Hi,
We find that the VALLDI mode iterator used in *aarch64_simd_ld1rmode
pattern is not appropriate.
The reason is that it's impossible to get a new operand of DImode by
vec_duplicating an operand of the same mode.
The vld1_lane intrinsic is currently implemented using inline asm. This patch
replaces that with a load and a straightforward use of vset_lane (this gives us
correct bigendian lane-flipping in a simple manner).
Naively this would produce assembler along the lines of (for vld1_lane_u8):
This patch replaces the inline asm for vld1_dup intrinsics with a vdup_n_ and a
load from the pointer. The existing *aarch64_simd_ld1rmode insn, combiner,
etc., are quite capable of generating the expected single ld1r instruction from
this. (I've verified by inspecting assembler output.)
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 1:35 PM, mliska mli...@suse.cz wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2014-11-13 Martin Liska mli...@suse.cz
* predict.c (propagate_freq): More elegant sreal API is used.
(estimate_bb_frequencies): New static constants defined by sreal
replace precomputed
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:42:27AM +, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:35 AM, James Greenhalgh
james.greenha...@arm.com wrote:
Hi,
We currently do not set any interesting default values for jump and function
alignment in AArch64. I've made the formula for these values
On 14 November 2014 00:56, Andrew Pinski apin...@cavium.com wrote:
This adds the schedule model for ThunderX. There are a few TODOs in that
not all of the SIMD is model currently. Also the idea of a simple
shift/extend is not modeled and all cases where there is a shift/extend
is considered
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:46:55AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
BTW: There are lots of places where std::swap can be used, a nice
search-and-replace task for someone to start with gcc development. ;)
Agreed ;) Note that
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 05:54:46PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/12/14 15:33, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
This patch makes the -fdiagnostics-color= default configurable, and
changes the default (if no configure option is specified
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 09:36:40AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
So please leave existing non-cold things as non-cold.
Bootstrapped/regtested on power8-linux, ok for trunk?
Ok with that change.
Thanks, this is the version with the builtins.def hunk dropped.
Applying to trunk.
2014-11-14
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:57:57AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
? There are also some comments about stdarg.h and stdio.h ordering,
dunno what it comes from and if it is still relevant when we require
C++ compiler.
I think we should simply discourage people from using sstream for
On 14 November 2014 10:50, James Greenhalgh james.greenha...@arm.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:42:27AM +, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:35 AM, James Greenhalgh
james.greenha...@arm.com wrote:
Hi,
We currently do not set any interesting default values for
Hi Jakub,
I have some questions about nvptx:
1) you've said that alloca isn't supported, but it seems
to be wired up and uses the %alloca documented in the PTX
manual, what is the issue with that? %alloca not being actually
implemented by the current PTX assembler or translator?
On 07/11/14 10:35, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
if armv6 never co-exist with NEON, personally I think your original
patch is better
because TARGET_NEON generally will be used when all options are
processed.
any way, this needs gate keeper's approval.
Ping, Richard.
Ping.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:57:57AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
? There are also some comments about stdarg.h and stdio.h ordering,
dunno what it comes from and if it is still relevant when we require
C++ compiler.
I
On 12 November 2014 13:11, Christophe Lyon christophe.l...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
The attached patch adds a few more tests to the recently added
advsimd-intrinsics series.
OK for trunk?
Christophe.
2014-11-12 Christophe Lyon christophe.l...@linaro.org
*
On 11/14/2014 11:01 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 09:29:48AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
I have some questions about nvptx:
Oh, and
5) I have noticed gcc doesn't generate the .uni suffixes anywhere,
while llvm generates them; are those appropriate only when a function
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com writes:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 02:09:59PM +0300, Yury Gribov wrote:
For asan you're right, we can have addresses of decls there etc.
If you have spare cycles, feel free to take over the patch and adjust it.
I guess I'd wait when this gets to trunk?
On 11/14/2014 12:03 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:57:57AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
? There are also some comments about stdarg.h and stdio.h ordering,
dunno what it comes from and if it is still relevant when we require
C++ compiler.
I think we should simply
Hello!
Here is one more merge of libsanitizer (last one was in Sept).
Tested on x86_64 Ubuntu 14.04 like this:
rm -rf */{*/,}libsanitizer make -j 50
make -j 40 -C gcc check-g{cc,++}
RUNTESTFLAGS='--target_board=unix\{-m32,-m64\} asan.exp' \
make -j 40 -C gcc check-g{cc,++}
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Marcus Shawcroft
marcus.shawcr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 November 2014 10:50, James Greenhalgh james.greenha...@arm.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:42:27AM +, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:35 AM, James Greenhalgh
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:09:03PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
I have some questions about nvptx:
1) you've said that alloca isn't supported, but it seems
to be wired up and uses the %alloca documented in the PTX
manual, what is the issue with that? %alloca not being actually
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:27:52PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 11/14/2014 12:03 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:57:57AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
? There are also some comments about stdarg.h and stdio.h ordering,
dunno what it comes from and if it is still relevant
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:53:19AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
Err - please adjust fold_negate_expr instead.
Like this?
(It's not best that for -trapv/-fsanitize=s-i-o we don't emit
compile-time warning integer overflow in expression for -INT_MIN,
because the warning relies on the folding.)
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:53:19AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
Err - please adjust fold_negate_expr instead.
Like this?
(It's not best that for -trapv/-fsanitize=s-i-o we don't emit
compile-time warning integer overflow in expression for
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:25:37PM +0100, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
+ /* True if there is a block with HAS_FREEING_CALL_P flag set
+ on any a path between imm(BB) and BB. */
s/a//.
Also, I'd rather say on any path between an immediate dominator of
BB, denoted imm(BB), and BB. That
Hi!
In r217554, I have committed a merge from trunk r217483 (2014-11-13) into
gomp-4_0-branch.
This is just before the first offloading commit in trunk, so this
revision of gomp-4_0-branch can now serve as a basis for merging the
gomp-4_0-branch changes with the offloading changes, which are the
On 14 November 2014 12:17, Marcus Shawcroft marcus.shawcr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 November 2014 13:11, Christophe Lyon christophe.l...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
The attached patch adds a few more tests to the recently added
advsimd-intrinsics series.
OK for trunk?
Christophe.
2014-11-12
Jason approved this yesterday on IRC.
Tested powerpc64-linux, committed to trunk.
commit 9a8efcc0e2068abb51aaf513b4a7ed262454cd1e
Author: Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Nov 14 11:00:24 2014 +
gcc/cp:
* mangle.c (find_substitution): Look for abi_tag on class
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com writes:
I am not sure, but I am wondering if we shouldn't save the previous uid
of 'stmt' here before setting it, and then restore it before getting out
of this function.
No, gimple uids are AFAIK undefined at the start of passes, passes that use
them are
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 01:06:52PM +0100, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com writes:
I am not sure, but I am wondering if we shouldn't save the previous uid
of 'stmt' here before setting it, and then restore it before getting out
of this function.
No, gimple uids are
h3 id=c-familyC family/h3
ul
+liThe code-fdiagnostics-color=/code option default is now
+configurable at GCC configury time using
+code--with-diagnostics-color=/code, can default to
+codeauto/code - the new default unless configured otherwise,
+where diagnostics is
I'm adding Thomas and Cesar to the Cc list, they may have more insight
into CUDA library questions as I haven't really looked into that part
all that much.
On 11/14/2014 12:39 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:09:03PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
I have some questions about
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 01:14:02PM +0100, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
h3 id=c-familyC family/h3
ul
+liThe code-fdiagnostics-color=/code option default is now
+configurable at GCC configury time using
+code--with-diagnostics-color=/code, can default to
+
This adds system_error support to iostreams, including the required
base class changes to std::ios_base::failure. The abi_tag is used to
make it a distinct type. This changes the type of I/O exceptions
thrown by the library but exceptions are very rarely used with
iostreams.
Tested
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 01:06:52PM +0100, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com writes:
I am not sure, but I am wondering if we shouldn't save the previous uid
of 'stmt' here before setting it, and then restore it before getting
Diego,
I noticed that a patch processed with mklog --inline got mangled.
In mklog, first we read the .diff file into array diff_lines. Then, in the case
of --inline, at the end we expect diff_lines still to contain the .diff file.
That's not the case however, and that causes the mangling.
On 11/13/2014 09:06 PM, mliska wrote:
+ Insert: O(2) amortized. O(1) actual.
This does not make much sense. Typo?
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security
Ah, I didn't realize Loongson was little-endian only. In that case (with mid-end
reductions-via-shifts changes pushed) I don't think I have actually broken
anything, or at least, no MIPS platform that exists :).
However, yes, that would seem a safe bet (and simpler than my linked patch that
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 01:16:36PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
That would be indeed nice (similarly for other stuff that we expect to be
undefined on pass boundaries, or expect to be in certain state at pass
boundaries; in the former case set before uses, and don't care about what
state
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 01:12:40PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
:(. So what other option one has to implement something like TLS, even
using inline asm or similar? There is %tid, so perhaps indexing some array
with %tid?
That ought to work. For performance you'd want that array in .shared
Following up https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg01233.html and
fixing the regressions this caused as soon as I removed the dispatch
to fold_unary (and more regressions it would have caused if I managed
to finish the idea to also remove the dispatches to fold_binary
and fold_ternary...)
On 11/14/2014 01:36 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Any way to query those limits? Size of .shared memory, number of threads in
warp, number of warps, etc.?
I'd have to google most of that. There seems to be a WARP_SZ constant
available in ptx to get the size of the warp.
In OpenACC, are all
On 14 November 2014 00:44, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Honza,
On 23 June 2014 06:24, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
--- lto-cgraph.c(revision 211881)
+++ lto-cgraph.c(working copy)
@@ -614,6 +614,7 @@ lto_output_varpool_node (struct lto_simp
/*
Brings back the last stage1 merge. I'll followup on the trunk
status of match-and-simplify on monday - development will now
continue on the branch.
Richard.
2014-11-14 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
Merge from trunk r217546 through r217560.
Brings back next merge piece.
We are planning to introduce a new optimization in aarch64 backend, similar to
the FP load balancing pass in the LLVM project [1]. This pass would be core
specific and involve doing some register renaming. An RFC version of this patch
should be posted later today. As part of this pass, we want
Hi,
On 11/14/2014 03:35 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/13/2014 04:31 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
I think this should be replaced with fold_ if
(processing_template_decl) in build_enumerator.
Ok. The value can be NULL_TREE, thus in a straightforward change (per
the below) I have to check for
On 11/14/2014 08:46 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+/* Like maybe_constant_value but first fully constant fold the argument. */
but first fully instantiate the argument.
OK with that change, thanks.
Jason
On 11/13/2014 04:50 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2014-11-12 Martin Liska mli...@suse.cz
* Makefile.in: New object file is added.
* cgraph.h (symbol_table::allocate_cgraph_symbol): Summary UID
is filled up.
* cgraph_summary.c: New file.
*
On 11/13/2014 05:04 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
+ if (!inline_summary_summary)
+inline_summary_summary = (inline_summary_cgraph_summary *)
inline_summary_cgraph_summary::create_ggc (symtab);
Hehe, this is funny naming scheme.
Peraps inline_summary_d and inline_summary_t for the data and type?
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is one more merge of libsanitizer (last one was in Sept).
Tested on x86_64 Ubuntu 14.04 like this:
rm -rf */{*/,}libsanitizer make -j 50
make -j 40 -C gcc check-g{cc,++}
On 14/11/14 10:02, Terry Guo wrote:
Hi there,
Attached patch intends to fix a pattern that is found still non-UAL when do
gcc thumb-1 bootstrap. A test case is reduced and attached. Tested with gcc
regression test on pre-v6 thumb1 and v6 thumb1. No regression. Multilib can
be built for both
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 03:11:16PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
The missing definition in system's /usr/include/linux/types.h is protected
with:
typedef __u16 __bitwise __le16;
typedef __u16 __bitwise __be16;
typedef __u32 __bitwise __le32;
typedef __u32 __bitwise __be32;
#if
Hi,
This patch adjusts the generic move costs to better reflect the INT-FP move
costs used in the
various core specific cost tables.
The intention of these generic costs is that they provide reasonable
performance across a range of
cores without unduly pessimizing any one specific core.
This
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 09:32:07PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
For i[34567]86-*-linux* and x86_64-*-linux* targets, config.gcc assumes
modern glibc and set default_gnu_indirect_function to yes. That is wrong
for i[34567]86-*-linux-android* and x86_64-*-linux-android* targets.
This patch fixes it.
* Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com [2014-11-13 14:13:42 +0100]:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:21:21PM +0100, Andrew Burgess wrote:
I had a look around and couldn't find anything helpful. The best I
can offer would be the current path within the llvm source code where
these are defined. Would
On Nov 14, 2014, at 4:57 AM, Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com wrote:
On 2014-10-21 12:06 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
...
I'd prefer symbolic constants for dont_delay. Also the address can contains
other parts, e.g. index for some targets. It is not necessary to change the
code but a
1 - 100 of 247 matches
Mail list logo
