On 14 July 2014 04:58:17 Kugan kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org wrote:
On 11/07/14 22:47, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Kugan
kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org wrote:
Thanks foe the review and suggestions.
On 10/07/14 22:15, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jul 7,
On 17 July 2014 02:51:14 Ulrich Weigand uweig...@de.ibm.com wrote:
Hello,
in testing the rs6000 ABI patches I noted a weird effect: usually, the
-Wpsabi warning notes are ignored in the compat test suites, so we get
a clean test run anyway.
However, when running the C++ version of the
Honza,
On 23 June 2014 06:24, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
--- lto-cgraph.c(revision 211881)
+++ lto-cgraph.c(working copy)
@@ -614,6 +614,7 @@ lto_output_varpool_node (struct lto_simp
/* in_other_partition. */
}
bp_pack_value (bp, node-tls_model,
On 14 November 2014 00:44, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Honza,
On 23 June 2014 06:24, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
--- lto-cgraph.c(revision 211881)
+++ lto-cgraph.c(working copy)
@@ -614,6 +614,7 @@ lto_output_varpool_node (struct lto_simp
/*
adjusting the new tests iff this patch was
accepted.
Ok for the trunk?
TIA and cheers,
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer (1):
testsuite: error out with tested condition instead of FOO
gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp | 68 +--
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 34
Use the (abbreviated) proprocessor condition for #error instead of FOO
so one can see the test issued.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2012-12-01 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer al...@gcc.gnu.org
* lib/target-supports.exp: error out with preprocessor condition
instead of FOO everywhere.
Signed-off
On 1 October 2014 14:21, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Oct 1, 2014, at 2:10 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com
wrote:
It would be handy to see the reason(s) why target-supports errors out.
Ok for the trunk?
Ok.
Installed as r215759.
Thanks!
On 3 October 2014 16:08:57 CEST, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
From: Andi Kleen a...@linux.intel.com
(check_no_cilk): Dito.
I'm just curious, but isn't the english term ditto (im österreichischen ugs.
detto, think latin idem) ?
On 6 October 2014 22:31:18 CEST, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Is it ok to commit these two patches now?
Yes, it is OK, thanks!
I do not see documentation of the new parameter added to doc in the ChangeLog?
Also, I would not abbreviate indir in the param name.
Thanks,
On 26 March 2014 03:17:11 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
Just 2 nits, cannot comment on the patch itself.
s/clonning/cloning/g as usual :)
And the content of the testcase is duplicated.
Thanks,
this patch fixes compile time issue in the testcase that is caused by fact
that the
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 12:16:23AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
This patch ensures that the finalization expression is generated and that
use-associated finalizers are properly accessed.
Build and regtested on x86-64-gnu-linux.
OK for the trunk?
Tobias
2014-04-04 Tobias Burnus
On 20 December 2013 13:16, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 November 2013 18:56, Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 November 2013 09:22, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On 11 November 2013 12:30, Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com wrote:
How does
Jonathan,
I see that you filed LWG 2249 (gets() removal), may i ask you to take
care of the tmpnam removal, too?
The reasoning would be exactly the same as for gets().
TIA cheers,
http://wg21.cmeerw.net/lwg/issue2249
On 14 April 2014 16:50:51 Patrick Palka patr...@parcs.ath.cx wrote:
Hi everyone,
This patch marks static a bunch of locally-used, non-debug functions
within the GCC sources. Doing so addresses a subset of the warnings emitted
when compiling the GCC sources with -Wmissing-declarations.
I
On 16 April 2014 13:38, Zoran Jovanovic zoran.jovano...@imgtec.com wrote:
Hello,
This is new patch version.
The comment from the previous iteration still holds true:
+@item -fbitfield-merge
you are talking about '-fmerge-bitfields' up until here.
Please fix all occurances of bitfield-merge,
the LLVM bits.
Ok for trunk?
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer (3):
libsanitizer: Fix !statfs64 builds
libsanitizer: add conditionals for libc
[LLVM] [sanitizer] add conditionals for libc
libsanitizer/asan/Makefile.am | 6 +
libsanitizer/asan/Makefile.in
libsanitizer/ChangeLog
2014-04-02 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer al...@gcc.gnu.org
* configure.ac: Check for sizeof(struct statfs64).
* configure, config.h.in: Regenerate.
* sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_interceptors.h
(SANITIZER_INTERCEPT_STATFS64): Make
for availability of netrom/netrom.h, sys/ustat.h (for obsolete
ustat() function), utime.h (for obsolete utime() function), wordexp.h.
Determine size of sigset_t instead of hardcoding it.
libsanitizer/ChangeLog
2014-04-16 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer al...@gcc.gnu.org
* configure.ac
for uClibc.
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com
---
CMakeLists.txt | 58 +++
cmake/Modules/CompilerRTUtils.cmake| 15 ++
cmake/Modules/FunctionExistsNotStub.cmake | 56 +++
lib/interception
,
please install it there, i do not have write access to the LLVM nor
compiler-rt trees.
TIA,
--kcc
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
Conditionalize usage of dlvsym(), nanosleep(), usleep();
Conditionalize layout of struct sigaction and type
On 17 April 2014 16:51:23 Konstantin Serebryany
konstantin.s.serebry...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 April 2014 16:07, Konstantin Serebryany
konstantin.s.serebry...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
If you are trying
On 17 April 2014 19:01, Konstantin Serebryany
konstantin.s.serebry...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 April 2014 16:51:23 Konstantin Serebryany
konstantin.s.serebry...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 6:27
On 18 May 2014 21:38:47 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
this patch makes GCC to use resolution info to turn COMDAT and WEAK
symbols into regular symbols based on feedback given by linker plugin.
If resolution says that given symbol is prevailing, it is possible
to turn them into normal
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Janne Blomqvist
blomqvist.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:00 AM, Janne Blomqvist
blomqvist.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
a common malloc() pattern is malloc(num_foo * sizeof(foo_t), that
is, create space for an array of type foo_t with
On 16 June 2014 08:20:09 Janne Blomqvist blomqvist.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Janne Blomqvist
blomqvist.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:00 AM, Janne
On 16 June 2014 09:39, Janne Blomqvist blomqvist.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 June 2014 08:20:09 Janne Blomqvist blomqvist.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On 17 June 2014 13:10:07 Илья Михальцов morph...@gmail.com wrote:
index 892ba35..39f795f 100644
--- a/gcc/config/darwin-c.c
+++ b/gcc/config/darwin-c.c
@@ -572,20 +572,31 @@ find_subframework_header (cpp_reader *pfile, const
char *header, cpp_dir **dirp)
/* Return the value of
On 18 June 2014 10:24:16 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
@@ -3002,10 +3014,8 @@ try_make_edge_direct_virtual_call (struct
cgraph_edge *ie,
if (target)
{
-#ifdef ENABLE_CHECKING
- gcc_assert (possible_polymorphic_call_target_p
-(ie, cgraph_get_node (target)));
-#endif
On 6 February 2014 16:42:05 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
As discussed on IRC, this patch introduces two new attributes,
so that the C library (and other headers) have a way to
a) tell the compiler something about functions like aligned_alloc
or memalign
b) tell the compiler the
On 12 February 2014 07:27:59 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
On 02/11/2014 07:54 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
+/* Allow combining RTTI and non-RTTI is OK. */
You mean combining -frtti and -fno-rtti compiles? Yes, that's fine,
though you need to prefer the -frtti version in case code
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 08:35:43PM +, Zoran Jovanovic wrote:
Hello,
This is new patch version.
Approach suggested by Richard Biener with lowering bit-field accesses instead
of modifying gimple trees is implemented.
New command line option -fmerge-bitfields is introduced.
Tested -
On 27 August 2014 16:22:28 CEST, Yvan Roux yvan.r...@linaro.org wrote:
Committed on trunk at r214573, and I'll backport it on 4.9 branch.
s/true/:/
?
Thanks,
On 2 September 2014 22:40:50 CEST, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/20/2014 05:17 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
Index: config/i386/i386.c
===
--- config/i386/i386.c (revision 211826)
+++ config/i386/i386.c
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:22:15PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Yury Gribov y.gri...@samsung.com wrote:
Hi all,
This patch adds a Vim config (.local.vimrc) to root folder. This would allow
automatic setup of GNU formatting for C/C++/Java/Lex files in GCC
On 5 September 2014 17:10, Yury Gribov y.gri...@samsung.com wrote:
Now I don't quite like the idea of plugin:
* .local.vimrc setting is more compatible with what we already have for
Emacs
* gcc_style.vim won't work for new files (it requires GCC license agreement)
true
* gcc_style.vim
On 11 September 2014 20:19:31 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 07:26:37PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
right now. The patch below intends to serialize the content of the
problematic *.exp tests (the first runtest to reach one of those will simply
run all the
On 12 September 2014 19:46:33 Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Sep 12, 2014, at 9:32 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Here is my latest version of the patch.
With this patch I get identical test_summary output on make -k check
(completely serial testing) and make -j48 -k
On 13 September 2014 02:04:51 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 04:42:25PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
curious, when I run atomic.exp=stdatom\*.c:
gcc.dg/atomic/atomic.exp completed in 30 seconds.
atomic.exp=c\*.c takes 522 seconds with 3, 2, 5 and 4 being the
On 15 September 2014 19:49:03 Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Sep 15, 2014, at 9:13 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Here is an attempt to fix gfortran dg.exp testing in case of very
fine-grained parallelization.
Ok.
Looks like the right approach, yes.
Many thanks for
contrib/ChangeLog:
2012-12-01 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer al...@gcc.gnu.org
* testsuite-management/validate_failures.py
(IsInterestingResult): Only strip line a second time if we did split.
Rephrase return statement while at it.
(CollectSumFiles): Also ignore .git
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:53:50AM -0500, Diego Novillo wrote:
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
contrib/ChangeLog:
2012-12-01 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer al...@gcc.gnu.org
* testsuite-management/validate_failures.py
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 10:31:57AM -0500, Diego Novillo wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
@@ -210,12 +211,12 @@ def IsInterestingResult(line):
if '|' in line:
(_, line) = line.split('|', 1)
line = line.strip()
- return any
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:44:59PM -0800, Teresa Johnson wrote:
Index: tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c
===
--- tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c(revision 194516)
+++ tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c(working copy)
@@ -639,22 +639,24 @@ unloop_loops
On 12 January 2013 16:28:41 Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
From: Andi Kleen a...@linux.intel.com
+Returns _XBEGIN_STARTED when the transaction
+started successfully (not this is not 0, so the constant has to be
not this is not 0? Or note?
Thanks,
Sent with AquaMail for Android
On 4 February 2013 20:42:55 Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
...now that all the output has been approved.
Richard
contrib/
* update-copyright.pl: New file.
Index: contrib/update-copyright.pl
===
---
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 10:31:57AM -0500, Diego Novillo wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
def IsComment(line):
Return True if line is a comment.
- return line.startswith('#')
+ return bool(re.matches(#, line))
startswith
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 06:57:44AM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
On Apr 13, 2012, at 3:51 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
Ping.
Before advancing, has the problem that Rainer pointed out on March 19th with
your earlier patch been fixed?
I believe that it is fixed, yes. See r185688 and my follow
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:47:48AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Approved but not yet committed:
Bernhard:
- [PATCH] gfortran testsuite: implicitly cleanup-modules, part 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-04/msg00065.html
Before actually pushing this, I ment to ask if we *want* to make
sure
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 07:34:30PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
On 18 April 2012 at 18:57, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:47:48AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Approved but not yet committed:
Bernhard:
- [PATCH] gfortran testsuite: implicitly cleanup-modules, part 2
http
?
The first patch below is the dejagnu part, the other patch is the
corresponding follow-up for gcc.
cheers,
Bernhard
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 03:59:58PM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:04:45AM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
The underlying problem
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 04:43:05PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jun 28, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
Perhaps you want to pursue this? We'd need to suggest this to dejagnu,
Actually, we have the technology, so that isn't necessary. :-) You can
install replacements for any
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 09:55:30PM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
There are comments in basic-block.h that advise to update certain
parts of the compiler if a new edge flag or basic block flag is added:
-/*
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:51:02AM +0530, Sandeep Soni wrote:
The patch adds support for creating individual gimple statements for
the gimple_cond and gimple_label statements.
Diego, I need your help in generalizing to include all possible cases
of these statements.
Here is the ChangeLog
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 01:21:00PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
/* The root of the compilation pass tree, once constructed. */
extern struct opt_pass *all_passes, *all_small_ipa_passes,
*all_lowering_passes,
Index: gcc/tree-if-switch-conversion.c
gcc/ChangeLog
2012-02-23 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer al...@gcc.gnu.org
* doc/passes.texi (Full redundancy elimination): Fix typo.
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com
---
gcc/doc/passes.texi |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
gcc/ChangeLog:
2012-02-23 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer al...@gcc.gnu.org
* tree-if-conv (predicate_scalar_phi): Commentary typo fix.
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com
---
gcc/tree-if-conv.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff
gcc/ChangeLog:
2012-02-23 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer al...@gcc.gnu.org
* tree-into-ssa (update_ssa): Avoid trailing whitespace in
dump_file.
* tree-ssa-sccvn.c (print_scc): Ditto.
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com
---
gcc/tree-into-ssa.c
gcc/ChangeLog
2012-02-23 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer al...@gcc.gnu.org
* doc/invoke.texi (-fdse, -fdce): Remove duplicate entries.
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com
---
gcc/doc/invoke.texi |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff
On 23 February 2012 22:33, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog
2012-02-23 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer al...@gcc.gnu.org
* doc/passes.texi (Full redundancy elimination): Fix typo.
Should be committed
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 07:21:29PM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2012-02-23 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer al...@gcc.gnu.org
* tree-if-conv (predicate_scalar_phi): Commentary typo fix.
Applied to trunk as obvious as r184546.
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer bernhard.reutner-fisc...@univie.ac.at
gcc/ChangeLog:
2010-01-03 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer al...@gcc.gnu.org
* gcc.c (display_help): Document --help=common and sort entries
alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer bernhard.reutner
From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer bernhard.reutner-fisc...@univie.ac.at
gcc/ChangeLog:
2009-07-29 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer al...@gcc.gnu.org
* gcc/doc/install.texi: Document check-$LANG specific shortcuts
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer bernhard.reutner-fisc...@univie.ac.at
in the ChangeLog entry below to keep the
documentation change associated with the script itself?
The patch was bootstrapped and regression tested using tcl-8.5 on
x86_64-linux-gnu with no new regressions.
Ok for trunk?
Thanks,
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2012-02-28 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer al
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 01:30:29PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
On Mar 13, 2012, at 9:38 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
Could some of the testsuite maintainers please eyeball?
I've eyed it, the only thing that stood out was:
-foreach testcase [lsort [glob -nocomplain $srcdir/$subdir/*.F
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:35:47PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 05:56:32PM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 04:57:12PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com wrote
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:04:45AM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
The underlying problem is that dejagnu's runtest.exp only allows for a
single libdir where it searches for includes -- see comment in
libgomp.exp and libitm.exp
While just adding more and more load_gcc_lib calls to users
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 06:36:12PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
Unfortunately, this patch creates a bogus warning in the libgomp
testsuite, which also shows up in mail-report.log:
WARNING: Line 30 includes unreadable file
\`/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/omp_lib.h'
On 30 August 2013 23:23:16 Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com
On 31 August 2013 19:15:46 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
remember_with_vars walks trees that are read from file (now unique)
and looks for fields that can contain pointers to vars or functions and
if so, it records them to global hashtable for
On 4 September 2013 00:17:00 Cong Hou co...@google.com wrote:
Could you please tell me how to check the precision of long double in
GCC on different platforms?
I did not follow your discussion but..
http://uclibc.org/~aldot/precision_check.f
Or something along those lines in your favourite
On 5 September 2013 13:02:29 Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On 04 Sep 20:11, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
On 4/09/2013, at 7:43 PM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
The patch is OK with definitions of OPTION_GLIBC, OPTION_UCLIBC and
OPTION_BIONIC copied verbatim from gcc/config/l
On 30 September 2013 14:19:01 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
This fixes PR58554, pattern recognition in loop distribution now
needs to check whether all stmts are unconditionally executed.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.
Richard.
2013-09-30
On 18 October 2013 22:55:39 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 01:52:54PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
On Oct 18, 2013, at 6:11 AM, Kenneth Zadeck zad...@naturalbridge.com wrote:
Does this look ok? Kenny, can you double check the cases, think I
have them right, but?
to catch these early on
in the future.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2013-10-12 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer al...@gcc.gnu.org
* lib/gcc-dg.exp (cleanup-ipa-dump, cleanup-rtl-dump,
cleanup-tree-dump, cleanup-dump): Remove. Adjust all callers.
(schedule-cleanups): New proc
to perform the pch check. Does
that make sense to you?
Regstrapped (together with the auto-removal patch just sent) on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with trunk@204119 without regressions.
Ok for trunk?
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2013-10-12 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer al...@gcc.gnu.org
* lib/dg
On 30 October 2013 22:47, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Oct 30, 2013, at 2:56 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com
wrote:
- set result [check_compile pchtest object int i; -x c-header]
+ set result [check_compile pchtest object $chk_type $chk_lang
On 31 October 2013 01:01, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Oct 30, 2013, at 2:41 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com
wrote:
I've noticed that this testcase doesn't clean up after itself.
This was nagging me last weekend.. ;)
What about automating this?
So
On 30 October 2013 23:22, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Oct 30, 2013, at 3:14 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com
wrote:
On 30 October 2013 22:47, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
Was there a significant purpose for the added C++ comment? If not, can you
On 4 April 2013 23:01, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
2013-03-24 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer al...@gcc.gnu.org
* configure.ac (libgcc_cv_dfp): Extend check to probe fenv.h
On 11 April 2013 14:18, Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi,
On 04/11/2013 02:04 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
I would have expected that somebody would tell me that omitting ::tmpnam
violates 27.9.2 cstdio from the spec but noone yelled at me yet?
Frankly, I didn't
On 4 April 2013 22:20, Bruce Korb bk...@gnu.org wrote:
Except as noted below, fine by me.
On 04/04/13 12:56, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and
x86_64-mine-linux-uclibc without regressions, ok for trunk?
fixincludes/ChangeLog:
2013
On 6 November 2013 08:04, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 02:24:01AM +, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Fixed patch is attached. The responses to your question are given below.
Is this patch OK?
Here is the ChangeLog entry:
+2013-11-05 Balaji V. Iyer
On 1 November 2013 02:15, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Oct 31, 2013, at 1:47 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com
wrote:
On 30 October 2013 23:22, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Oct 30, 2013, at 3:14 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 05:30:00PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
Richard,
Consider the test-case test.c:
...
int z;
int x;
void
f (int c, int d)
{
if (c)
z = 5;
else
{
if (d)
x = 4;
z = 5;
}
}
...
Atm, we don't tail-merge the 'z = 5' blocks, because
On 10 November 2013 13:49:37 Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
this patch adds exeext to -rdynamic and exported symbol-check within
configure.ac. By this this test will be preformed as intended on
targets with executable-extensions (nevertheless -rdynamics will still
fail for
On 11 November 2013 12:30, Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 November 2013 10:29, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On 04/11/2013 02:04 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
I would have expected that somebody would tell me that omitting ::tmpnam
violates 27.9.2 cstdio from
On 27 November 2013 11:10, Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 02:26:12PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 13.06.2013 11:42, schrieb Richard Sandiford:
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com writes:
On 12 June 2013 20:20:50 Richard Sandiford rdsandif
Hi,
s/imlpies/implied/
Sent with AquaMail for Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com
On 18 October 2012 17:30:20 Meador Inge mead...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Ping ^ 2
Been a while but wasn't --with-build-sysroot for exactly this?
On 10/09/2012 09:44 PM, Meador Inge wrote:
Ping.
On 102012 03:45 PM, Meador Inge wrote:
Hi All,
Currently the gcc-{ar,nm,ranlib} utilities
On 30 April 2013 00:55:16 Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
+ if (flag_enable_cilkplus contains_array_notation_expr (cond))
+{
+ error_at (start_locus, array notation expression cannot be used
in a
+ loop%'s condition);
+ return;
+}
+ if
On 8 May 2013 15:11:18 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
2013-05-08 Nathan Sidwell nat...@codesourcery.com
gcc/
* varasm.c (default_use_anchors_for_symbol_p): Reject WEAK.
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.dg/visibility-21.c: New.
Index: gcc/varasm.c
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 05:52:26PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
2013-05-09 Chung-Lin Tang clt...@codesourcery.com
PR target/32219
* rtlanal.c (nonzero_address_p): Robustify checking by look
recursively into PIC constant offsets and (CONST (UNSPEC ...))
expressions.
On 11 May 2013 21:29:53 Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
This just removes one unused function, and moves two functions from
emit-rtl.c to reorg.c which is the only place where they're used.
Will commit in a few days, barring objections.
Ciao!
Steven
* rtl.h
On 22 May 2013 16:36:52 David Edelsohn dje@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Alan Modra amo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:05:47AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
Why does cross need the functions in libgcc and not provided by the linker?
Only the ppc64
On 31 May 2013 15:57:25 Manfred Schwarb manfre...@gmx.ch wrote:
Am 31.05.2013 14:28, schrieb Janus Weil:
Wouldn't it work to use the TIOCGWINSZ ioctl only if isatty() reports
that we're outputting to a terminal?
Good point. Updated patch attached, which imposes no limit if we're
not
On 29 June 2012 04:59, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jun 28, 2012, at 5:15 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 04:43:05PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jun 28, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
Perhaps you want to pursue this? We'd need
On 9 June 2013 05:31, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
Guard also with L_IPO_COMP_MODE as this is lipo specific.
Sounds like this is the LIPO incarnation of http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31537
See the patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31537#c9 for not adding the
alias in the first place (back
ping, CCing middle-end maintainers for review.
On 31 May 2013 10:13, Chung-Lin Tang clt...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On 13/5/15 8:12 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Chung-Lin Tang clt...@codesourcery.com writes:
On 13/5/10 6:37 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Chung-Lin Tang clt...@codesourcery.com
On 12 June 2013 20:20:50 Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com writes:
Index: config/mips/t-linux64
===
--- config/mips/t-linux64 (revision 200012)
+++ config/mips/t-linux64
On 19 June 2013 15:57, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/19/2013 01:02 AM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
2013/6/19 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-28.c: New test.
In the gnu coding standard we have a space before
the open-parentheses. Would that be great to have
1 - 100 of 881 matches
Mail list logo
