Log
===
--- gcc/ChangeLog (revision 255466)
+++ gcc/ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2017-12-07 Sebastian Perta
+
+ * config/rl78/rl78.md: New define_expand "umaxdi3".
+
2017-12-07 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/83296
Index: gcc/con
Log
===
--- gcc/ChangeLog (revision 255467)
+++ gcc/ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2017-12-07 Sebastian Perta
+
+ * config/rl78/rl78.md: New define_expand "smaxdi3".
+
2017-12-07 Michael Matz
Add unroll and jam pass
Index: gcc/config
Log
===
--- gcc/ChangeLog (revision 255468)
+++ gcc/ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2017-12-07 Sebastian Perta
+
+ * config/rl78/rl78.md: New define_expand "smindi3".
+
+
2017-12-07 Tamar Christina
PR target/82641
Index: gcc/config
Log
===
--- gcc/ChangeLog (revision 255471)
+++ gcc/ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2017-12-07 Sebastian Perta
+
+ * config/rl78/rl78.md: New define_expand "umindi3".
+
2017-12-07 Vladimir Makarov
PR target/83252
Inde
gcc/ChangeLog (revision 255511)
+++ gcc/ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2017-12-08 Sebastian Perta
+
+ * config/rl78/rl78.md: New define_expand "anddi3".
+
2017-12-08 Martin Jambor
PR tree-optimization/83141
Index: gcc/confi
Hello Jeff,
Thank you for your comments.
>>So I think you're ultimately far better off determining why GCC does not
>>generate efficient code for 64bit logicals on the rl78 target.
I totally agree with you, this is why:
1. I have another patch: I define_expand movdi in which I instruct GCC to use
you!
Sebastian
Index: ChangeLog
===
--- ChangeLog (revision 255538)
+++ ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2017-12-12 Sebastian Perta
+
+ * config/rl78/rl78-protos.h: New function declaration
rl78_split_m
)
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2017-12-12 Sebastian Perta
+
+ * config/rl78/rl78-expand.md: New define_expand "bswaphi2"
+ * config/rl78/rl78-virt.md: New define_insn "*bswaphi2_virt"
+ * config/rl78/rl78-real.md: New define_insn "*bswaphi2_real"
+
ndex: ChangeLog
===
--- ChangeLog (revision 255643)
+++ ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
+2017-12-14 Sebastian Perta
+
+ * config/rl78/rl78.c (rl78_get_pragma_address): New function
+ * config/rl78/rl78.c (rl78_note_pragm
ndex: ChangeLog
===
--- ChangeLog(revision 256076)
+++ ChangeLog(working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,21 @@
+2018-01-03 Sebastian Perta
+
+* config/rx/rx.c (rx_get_pragma_address): New function
+* config/rx/rx.c (rx_note_pragma_address): New function
+*
Sorry the spaces got removed from previous email.
-Original Message-
From: Sebastian Perta
Sent: 05 January 2018 10:59
To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
Subject: [PATCH] RX pragma address
Hello,
The following patch adds a new pragma, "pragma address" for RX.
The patch
-
From: Oleg Endo [mailto:oleg.e...@t-online.de]
Sent: 05 January 2018 11:59
To: Sebastian Perta ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RX pragma address
Hi,
On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 11:03 +, Sebastian Perta wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The following patch adds a new pragma, "pragma ad
ot I will follow your suggestion and move it out from the M32C target and
make it available for every target.
Best Regards,
Sebastian
-Original Message-
From: Oleg Endo [mailto:oleg.e...@t-online.de]
Sent: 05 January 2018 12:50
To: Sebastian Perta ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [
g (revision 256278)
+++ ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2018-01-05 Sebastian Perta
+
+ * config/rx/constraints.md: added new constraint CALL_OP_SYMBOL_REF
+ to allow or block "symbol_ref" depending on value of TARGET_JSR
+ * config/rx/rx.md: use CALL_OP_S
Hello,
The AP4 tool team have agreed with this change and are willing to update their
tool.
So I would like to drop this patch.
Best Regards,
Sebastian
-Original Message-
From: Sebastian Perta [mailto:sebastian.pe...@renesas.com]
Sent: 05 January 2018 13:46
To: 'Oleg Endo&#
Hello,
So I would like to drop this patch.
Oleg Endo has proposed a better solution:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg00305.html
Best Regards,
Sebastian
-Original Message-
From: Sebastian Perta [mailto:sebastian.pe...@renesas.com]
Sent: 15 December 2017 09:25
To:
2)
+++ ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2018-01-09 Sebastian Perta
+
+ *config/rx.md: updated "movsicc" expand to be matched by GCC
+ *testsuite/gcc.target/rx/movsicc.c: new test case
+
2018-01-09 Richard Bie
))
Also later on (in 290r.peephole2) we see that instruction 41 is eliminated
as well:
DCE: Deleting insn 41
deleting insn with uid = 41.
Best Regards,
Sebastian
> -Original Message-
> From: DJ Delorie [mailto:d...@redhat.com]
> Sent: 09 January 2018 22:55
> To: Sebastian Per
===
--- ChangeLog (revision 256590)
+++ ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2018-01-12 Sebastian Perta
+
+ * config/rl78/rl78.c (rl78_note_reg_set): fixed dead reg check
+ for non-QImode registers
+
2018-01-12 Vladimir Makarov
suggestion.
Best Regards,
Sebastian
Index: ChangeLog
===
--- ChangeLog(revision 256590)
+++ ChangeLog(working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2018-01-12 Sebastian Perta
+
+* config/rl78/rl78.c (rl78_note_reg_set): fixed dead reg check
+for non
Hi,
Just added myself to MAINTAINERS (write after approval)
Best Regards,
Sebastian
Index: ChangeLog
===
--- ChangeLog(revision 256737)
+++ ChangeLog(working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2018-01-16 Sebastian Perta
+
+* MAINTAINERS
Hello,
I am interested in implementing a new pass in gcc to merge identical
sequences of code in GCC to be used mainly for RL78.
The commercial RL78 compilers have such algorithms implemented and they make
quite good use of it.
Opportunities arise from the limited capabilities of RL78, for other
; From: Martin Jambor [mailto:mjam...@suse.cz]
> Sent: 18 January 2018 15:18
> To: Sebastian Perta ; gcc-
> patc...@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: l...@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: New code merge optimization?
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 18 2018, Sebastian Perta wrote:
> > Hello,
> &
art asking questions.
Best Regards,
Sebastian
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Pinski [mailto:pins...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 18 January 2018 16:19
> To: Sebastian Perta
> Cc: Martin Jambor ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org;
> l...@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: New code merge o
HI DJ,
>>Do you have checkin privs yet?
>> This is ok aside from.. ... + /* Do not mark the reg unused unless all
QImode parts of it are dead. */
Can I checkin this patch? Thank you!
Best Regards,
Sebastian
> -Original Message-
> From: Sebastian Perta
> Sent:
=--target_board=rl78-sim
Please let me know if this is OK to check-in, Thank you!
Best Regards,
Sebastian
Index: ChangeLog
===
--- ChangeLog (revision 257055)
+++ ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2018-01-25 Sebastian Perta
2018 19:38
> To: Sebastian Perta
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] RL78 addsi3 improvement
>
>
> This is OK.
>
> I wonder if these types of optimizations should be added to the
> assembler too? At least, if relaxation is enabled...
18-01-29 Sebastian Perta
+
+ * config/rl78/rl78.c (add_vector_labels): New function.
+ * config/rl78/rl78.c (rl78_handle_vector_attribute): New function.
+ * config/rl78/rl78.c (rl78_start_function): Call add_vector_labels.
+ * config/rl78/rl78.c (rl78_handle_func_attr
id __attribute__ ((interrupt)) interrupt_handler ();
+
+void interrupt_handler ()
+{
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "tableentry" } } */
> -Original Message-
> From: DJ Delorie [mailto:d...@redhat.com]
> Sent: 29 January 2018 21:11
> To: Sebastian Perta
> Cc:
PING
> -Original Message-
> From: Sebastian Perta [mailto:sebastian.pe...@renesas.com]
> Sent: 08 January 2018 10:57
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: [PATCH] -mjsr option bug fix
>
> Hi,
>
> The -mjsr option in RX should ensure the that BSR instructi
PING
> -Original Message-
> From: Sebastian Perta [mailto:sebastian.pe...@renesas.com]
> Sent: 09 January 2018 14:46
> To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: [PATCH] RX movsicc degrade fix
>
> Hello,
>
> In recent versions of GCC the define_expa
-Original Message-
> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: 09 February 2018 18:24
> To: Sebastian Perta ; Nick Clifton
>
> Cc: gcc-patches
> Subject: Re: PING [PATCH] RX movsicc degrade fix
>
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 02:10:21PM +
-02-09 Sebastian Perta
- * config/rx.md: updated "movsicc" expand to be matched by GCC
- * testsuite/gcc.target/rx/movsicc.c: new test case
+ * config/rx/rx.md (movsicc): Update expander to be matched by GCC.
2018-02-09 Peter Bergner
@@ -143,10 +142,10 @@
I think this is OK, please confirm.
Best Regards,
Sebastian
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: 12 February 2018 13:30
> To: Sebastian Perta
> Cc: Nick Clifton ; gcc-patches patc...@gcc.gnu.org>
> Subject: Re: PING [PATCH] RX mov
@@
+2018-02-12 Sebastian Perta
+
+ * config/rl78/rl78.c (add_vector_labels): New function.
+ * config/rl78/rl78.c (rl78_handle_vector_attribute): New function.
+ * config/rl78/rl78.c (rl78_start_function): Call add_vector_labels.
+ * config/rl78/rl78.c (rl78_handle_fu
y)
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2018-02-13 Sebastian Perta
+
+ * config/rx/rx.c (TARGET_RTX_COSTS): Define.
+ * config/rx/rx.c (rx_rtx_costs): New function.
+
2018-02-13 Paolo Bonzini
PR sanitizer/84340
Index: rx.c
=
257733)
+++ ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2018-02-16 Sebastian Perta
+
+ * config/rl78/rl78.md (movdf): New define expand.
+
2018-02-16 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/84417
Index: rl78.md
? Or do I need to add the new pass as well for this to be
considered? Thank you!
Regression test is OK, tested with the following command:
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=rl78-sim
Best Regards,
Sebastian
2018-02-20 Sebastian Perta
* config/rl78/rl78-expand.md (one_cmplhi
stian
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick Clifton [mailto:ni...@redhat.com]
> Sent: 22 February 2018 15:41
> To: Oleg Endo ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Sebastian Perta ; 'DJ Delorie'
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] RX TARGET_RTX_COSTS function
>
> Hi Oleg,
est Regards,
Sebastian
> -Original Message-
> From: DJ Delorie [mailto:d...@redhat.com]
> Sent: 20 February 2018 19:39
> To: Sebastian Perta
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] RL78 one_cmplhi2 improvement
>
>
> Const type promotion is the ba
=--target_board=rx-sim
Please find below the changelog entries and patch.
Best Regards,
Sebastian
--- ChangeLog
2018-10-23 Sebastian Perta
* config/rx/rx.c (RX_BUILTIN_BSET): New enum.
* config/rx/rx.c (rx_init_builtins): Added new builtin for BSET.
* config/rx/rx.c
PING
> -Original Message-
> From: Sebastian Perta
> Sent: 24 October 2018 18:19
> To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Cc: 'Nick Clifton'
> Subject: [PATCH] RX new builtin function
>
> Hi,
>
> The following patch adds a new builtin
===
--- gcc/ChangeLog(revision 253893)
+++ gcc/ChangeLog(working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2017-10-13 Sebastian Perta
+
+* config/rl78/rl78.md: New define_expand "subdi3".
+
2017-10-19 Eric Botcazou
PR debug/82509
Index: gcc/config/rl
===
--- gcc/ChangeLog(revision 251091)
+++ gcc/ChangeLog(working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+2017-08-14 Sebastian Perta
+
+changed long long addition for RL78
+* gcc/config/rl78/rl78.c (rl78_emit_libcall): new function.
+* gcc/config/rl78/rl78-protos.h (rl78_emit_libcall): new function.
+* gcc
Hi,
I would like to ping the below patch posted on 14th of august.
Thank you!
Sebastian
-Original Message-
From: Sebastian Perta
Sent: 14 August 2017 15:26
To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
Subject: [PATCH] rl78 adddi3 improvement
The following patch improves both the spee
45 matches
Mail list logo
