On 04/17/2012 03:33 PM, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> Bernd, could you elaborate on the segfault you had seen? Perhaps we could
> offer some advice on fixing it then.
It was only seen with another patch which modified the sched-rgn
initialization code.
> In the meanwhile, could you revert your patc
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Bernd Schmidt
> wrote:
> > The order of calls to sched_rgn_init and sched_init differs between
> > sched-rgn and sel-sched. This caused a scheduler patch I was working on
> > to segfault once sel-sched was enabled.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> The order of calls to sched_rgn_init and sched_init differs between
> sched-rgn and sel-sched. This caused a scheduler patch I was working on
> to segfault once sel-sched was enabled. The following patch swaps the
> two function calls.
>
> Bo
The order of calls to sched_rgn_init and sched_init differs between
sched-rgn and sel-sched. This caused a scheduler patch I was working on
to segfault once sel-sched was enabled. The following patch swaps the
two function calls.
Bootstrapped & tested on i686-linux. Ok?
Bernd
* sel-sched
