On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 5:00 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> Thanks. How does this look?
It looks OK. It still doesn't mention compression, but that is
documented other places so it isn't a big deal.
Jim
On Fri, 02 Mar 2018 16:27:41 PST (-0800), Jim Wilson wrote:
On 03/01/2018 01:26 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
+@item -mrelax
+@itemx -mno-relax
+Take advantage of linker relaxations to reduce the number of instructions
+required to materalize symbol addresses.
materalize->materialize
This is not
On 03/01/2018 01:26 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
+@item -mrelax
+@itemx -mno-relax
+Take advantage of linker relaxations to reduce the number of instructions
+required to materalize symbol addresses.
materalize->materialize
This is not just number of instructions, it is also code size, since
lin
