This is a small follow-up change that I had meant to commit for
a while (ahem); done now.
Thanks for taking the time to write this up!
Gerald
Index: changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.7/changes.html,v
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@axis.com
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 01:16:09 +0200
+to be compiled with code-mno-unaligned-accesses/code./li
Better spelled as -mno-unaligned-access. Bah.
brgds, H-P
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@axis.com
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:59:57 +0200
From: Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:04:19 +0200
On 8 June 2012 16:53, Hans-Peter Nilsson hans-peter.nils...@axis.com
wrote:
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@axis.com
Date:
On 13 June 2012 02:32, Hans-Peter Nilsson hans-peter.nils...@axis.com wrote:
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@axis.com
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:59:57 +0200
From: Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:04:19 +0200
On 8 June 2012 16:53, Hans-Peter Nilsson
From: Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:43:47 +0200
On 13 June 2012 02:32, Hans-Peter Nilsson hans-peter.nils...@axis.com wrote:
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@axis.com
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:59:57 +0200
user-space code. Maybe the kernel too, I can't
On 8 June 2012 16:53, Hans-Peter Nilsson hans-peter.nils...@axis.com wrote:
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@axis.com
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 06:29:04 +0200
From: Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 05:50:52 +0200
The combination of
older Linux ARM kernels and GCC 4.7
This is only a review wearing my web hat; it is orthogonal to the
discussion with the ARM guys. ;-)
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
+liOn ARM, when compiling for ARMv6 (but not ARMv6-M), ARMv7-A,
+ARMv7-R, or ARMv7-M, the default of the new option
+
From: Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:04:19 +0200
On 8 June 2012 16:53, Hans-Peter Nilsson hans-peter.nils...@axis.com wrote:
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@axis.com
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 06:29:04 +0200
From: Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org
Date:
On 8 June 2012 12:15, Hans-Peter Nilsson hans-peter.nils...@axis.com wrote:
(CC to ARM maintainer approving the original patch.)
I'm listing this under caveats rather than improvements and
before the current top ARM-related caveat (as this one is more
important :) because I don't see
From: Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 04:42:30 +0200
On 8 June 2012 12:15, Hans-Peter Nilsson hans-peter.nils...@axis.com wrote:
The some source
codes was in the analyzed case a strcpy of a five-byte string
(busybox/libbb/procps.c:365 'strcpy(filename_tail,
On 8 June 2012 15:20, Hans-Peter Nilsson hans-peter.nils...@axis.com wrote:
From: Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 04:42:30 +0200
On 8 June 2012 12:15, Hans-Peter Nilsson hans-peter.nils...@axis.com wrote:
The some source
codes was in the analyzed case a strcpy of
From: Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 05:50:52 +0200
On 8 June 2012 15:20, Hans-Peter Nilsson hans-peter.nils...@axis.com wrote:
So the default for ALIGNMENT_TRAP changed in 3.1?
ALIGNMENT_TRAP is on by default but the early boot time trap is now
conditional on
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@axis.com
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 06:29:04 +0200
From: Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 05:50:52 +0200
The combination of
older Linux ARM kernels and GCC 4.7 gives a faulty kernel.
We're in agreement!
Oh wait sorry, my bad, I
13 matches
Mail list logo
