On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 22:10 +0900, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> Oleg Endo wrote:
> >> BTW, do you have the numbers of CSiBE with this?
> >>
> >
> > Only for "-m4-single -ml -O2 -mpretend-cmove" so far.
> > Not so spectacular :T
> > I'll also do a comparison of more variants to see if something went
> > r
Oleg Endo wrote:
>> BTW, do you have the numbers of CSiBE with this?
>>
>
> Only for "-m4-single -ml -O2 -mpretend-cmove" so far.
> Not so spectacular :T
> I'll also do a comparison of more variants to see if something went
> really bad. It's a bit difficult to isolate the degradations because
On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 07:14 -0700, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > > BTW, do you have the numbers of CSiBE with this?
> >
> > Only for "-m4-single -ml -O2 -mpretend-cmove" so far.
> > Not so spectacular :T
> > I'll also do a comparison of more variants to see if something we
- Original Message -
> > BTW, do you have the numbers of CSiBE with this?
>
> Only for "-m4-single -ml -O2 -mpretend-cmove" so far.
> Not so spectacular :T
> I'll also do a comparison of more variants to see if something went
> really bad. It's a bit difficult to isolate the degradations
On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 22:42 +0900, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> Oleg Endo wrote:
> > The attached patch adds HImode addressing support.
> > Tested against rev. 186243 with
> > sudo make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim
> > \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m2a-single/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,
> > -m4-sing
Oleg Endo wrote:
> The attached patch adds HImode addressing support.
> Tested against rev. 186243 with
> sudo make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim
> \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m2a-single/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,
> -m4-single/-ml,-m4-single/-mb,-m4a-single/-ml,-m4a-single/-mb}"
>
> and