RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: GCC selftest improvements

2020-03-02 Thread Modi Mo via gcc
> From: David Malcolm > > Thanks Modi. > > Before looking at the updated patch in detail, we ought to also address the > legal prerequisites for contributing. > > Does your employer have legal paperwork in place with the FSF for such > contributions? See: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.ht

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: GCC selftest improvements

2020-02-25 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis via gcc
@gcc.gnu.org ; r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de ; mikest...@comcast.net ; ja...@redhat.com ; Jonathan Wakely ; Richard Biener Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: GCC selftest improvements On Tue, 2020-02-25 at 19:58 +, Modi Mo wrote: > > On 2/12/20 8:53 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > > The patch will ne

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: GCC selftest improvements

2020-02-25 Thread David Malcolm
On Tue, 2020-02-25 at 19:58 +, Modi Mo wrote: > > On 2/12/20 8:53 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > > The patch will need an update to the docs; search for > > "Tools/packages necessary for building GCC" in > > gcc/doc/install.texi, which currently has some paragraphs labelled: > >@item ISO C++98

RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: GCC selftest improvements

2020-02-25 Thread Modi Mo via gcc
> On 2/12/20 8:53 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > The patch will need an update to the docs; search for > "Tools/packages necessary for building GCC" in > gcc/doc/install.texi, which currently has some paragraphs labelled: >@item ISO C++98 compiler > that will need changing. Added this change in th

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: GCC selftest improvements

2020-02-15 Thread Jeff Law
On Thu, 2020-02-13 at 22:18 +, Modi Mo wrote: > > On 2/12/20 8:53 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > > > Thanks for the patch. > > > > > > Some nitpicks: > > > > > > Timing-wise, the GCC developer community is focusing on gcc 10 > > > bugfixing right now (aka "stage 4" of the release cycle). So this

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: GCC selftest improvements

2020-02-14 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi! On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:18:27PM +, Modi Mo via gcc wrote: > Segher here suggests 4.8.5 instead of 4.8.2: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2019-11/msg00192.html I said as long as 4.8.5 works, it is fine with me. If 4.8.2 can be made to work easily that is useful for the few people who wou

RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: GCC selftest improvements

2020-02-13 Thread Modi Mo via gcc
> On 2/12/20 8:53 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > > Thanks for the patch. > > > > Some nitpicks: > > > > Timing-wise, the GCC developer community is focusing on gcc 10 > > bugfixing right now (aka "stage 4" of the release cycle). So this > > patch won't be suitable to commit to master until stage 1 of

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: GCC selftest improvements

2020-02-12 Thread Nicholas Krause
On 2/12/20 8:53 PM, David Malcolm wrote: On Thu, 2020-02-13 at 00:49 +, Modi Mo wrote: Hey all, I'm picking this work up from Andrew. Last time it was decided that the timing wasn't right to upgrade the minimum version to C++11. Is the timing better now to get this change through? I've

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: GCC selftest improvements

2020-02-12 Thread David Malcolm
On Thu, 2020-02-13 at 00:49 +, Modi Mo wrote: > Hey all, > > I'm picking this work up from Andrew. Last time it was decided that > the timing wasn't right to upgrade the minimum version to C++11. Is > the timing better now to get this change through? > > I've attached the patch Andrew prepare

RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: GCC selftest improvements

2020-02-12 Thread Modi Mo via gcc
Hey all, I'm picking this work up from Andrew. Last time it was decided that the timing wasn't right to upgrade the minimum version to C++11. Is the timing better now to get this change through? I've attached the patch Andrew prepared. Can I get feedback on the change and some help testing on