Re: [Maxima-discuss] gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2023-01-14 Thread Raymond Toy
itlab.com/embeddable-common-lisp/ecl/-/tree/emscripten >> >> -Original Message----- >> From: Marius Gerbershagen >> Sent: Jan 14, 2023 9:39 AM >> To: >> Cc: >> Subject: Re: [Maxima-discuss] gcl-2.6.13 released [stable] >> >> It's pe

Re: [Maxima-discuss] gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2023-01-14 Thread Raymond Toy
t; > -Original Message- > From: Marius Gerbershagen > Sent: Jan 14, 2023 9:39 AM > To: > Cc: > Subject: Re: [Maxima-discuss] gcl-2.6.13 released [stable] > > It's perhaps worth noting that ECL can be made to run in this way in a > browser and will official

Re: [Maxima-discuss] gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2023-01-14 Thread Raymond Toy
e would never want to run GCL 'under' WASM. > > > > Take care, > > > > Henry Baker writes: > > > > > Hi Camm: > > > > > > Dumb question: > > > > > > Has anyone gotten GCL to run within WASM yet? > &

Re: [Maxima-discuss] gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2023-01-14 Thread Camm Maguire
t; > Hi Camm: >> > >> > Dumb question: >> > >> > Has anyone gotten GCL to run within WASM yet? >> > >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Camm Maguire >> > Sent: Jan 12, 2023 11:07 AM >> > To: Jerry James , >&g

Re: [Maxima-discuss] gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2023-01-14 Thread Camm Maguire
nt: Jan 12, 2023 11:07 AM > To: Jerry James , > Cc: , > Subject: Re: [Maxima-discuss] gcl-2.6.13 released [stable] > > Greetings! Just to report that this has now been resolved, and the > release tarball can now be retrieved from the official gnu site. > > That sa

Re: gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2023-01-12 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Just to report that this has now been resolved, and the release tarball can now be retrieved from the official gnu site. That said, a cleanup 2.6.14 release is forthcoming shortly, with the principal goal of supporting gcc-12. Take care, Jerry James writes: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 a

Re: gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2023-01-09 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Yes, we will alas need a cleanup 2.6.14 release in the immediate future. In general I like the lifetime of releases to be long, but in this case we released assuming the current gcc had a bug that needed fixing, and only found out after release that the behavior was deliberate. We can

Re: gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2023-01-07 Thread Raymond Toy
On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 10:10 AM Camm Maguire wrote: > Greetings! Correct -- my upload was rejected for an as yet undetermined > signature verification failure. I am corresponding with them about it, > and received my first reply yesterday. > Will there be an updated version of 2.6.13 that

Re: gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2023-01-07 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Correct -- my upload was rejected for an as yet undetermined signature verification failure. I am corresponding with them about it, and received my first reply yesterday. Take care, Jerry James writes: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 8:22 AM Camm Maguire wrote: >> Greetings! Yes, t

Re: gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2023-01-06 Thread Jerry James
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 8:22 AM Camm Maguire wrote: > Greetings! Yes, the upload still seems stuck in the ftp-upload queue, > but all feedback thus far indicates a successful installation: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/ftp-upload-report/2022-12/msg00062.html > > I'm hoping it appears in

Re: gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2023-01-03 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Please try again with --disable-readline, and post your readline (or editline etc. equivalent) version. Take care, > * Camm Maguire [2022-12-22 23:34]: > > Greetings! I think you are building the master branch, not the > > Version_2_6_13 branch just released, which is current 'stabl

Re: gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2023-01-03 Thread Jean Louis
* Camm Maguire [2022-12-22 23:34]: > Greetings! I think you are building the master branch, not the > Version_2_6_13 branch just released, which is current 'stable'. I did: $ git checkout Version_2_6_13 and then run: ยง ./configure --prefix /package/prog/gcl and got this error: ---snip--- --

Re: gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2022-12-23 Thread Jerry James
On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 1:55 PM Jerry James wrote: > I was able to reduce your test code, Camm, and have filed > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156088. I am now going > to vanish for the rest of the year, but will have sporadic email > access. I haven't quite vanished yet, and I al

Re: gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2022-12-23 Thread Jerry James
On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 8:44 AM Jerry James wrote: > I have discovered that adding -fno-tree-vrp to the build flags makes > your example compile successfully (found by doing a binary search on > the optimization flags added between -O1, where the example works, and > -O2, where it does not). I wa

Re: gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2022-12-23 Thread Jerry James
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 10:31 AM Camm Maguire wrote: > My strong guess is that you are using gcc-12. There is a known bug > therein preventing gcl from using it until fixed. I anticipate this > won't take too long, so have not put any configure checks etc. in the > way. > > https://bugs.debian.o

Re: gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2022-12-22 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! I think you are building the master branch, not the Version_2_6_13 branch just released, which is current 'stable'. I've just built master here locally, so in case you are interested in that branch, I'd love to see the full build log, as I can build without issue (Debian Linux sid) Ta

Re: gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2022-12-22 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Yes either wait, or do what I do with Debian/Ubuntu, build-depend on gcc-11 until gcc-12 is ready. Clang in debian/sid works as well. Take care, > On Wed, 21 Dec 2022, Camm Maguire wrote: > > My strong guess is that you are using gcc-12. There is a known bug > therein preve

Re: gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2022-12-21 Thread Jean Louis
I cannot compile from git: COMPILER>4295840256 heap words available NIL COMPILER>[ "" = "" ] || \ ! [ -x /usr/bin/objdump ] || \ ! /usr/bin/objdump -f saved_pre_gcl | grep "file format" | grep "elf" || \ ! /usr/bin/objdump -R saved_pre_gcl |grep R_.*_COPY || \ ! e

Re: gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2022-12-21 Thread Andrey G. Grozin
On Wed, 21 Dec 2022, Camm Maguire wrote: My strong guess is that you are using gcc-12. There is a known bug therein preventing gcl from using it until fixed. I anticipate this won't take too long, so have not put any configure checks etc. in the way. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c

Re: gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2022-12-21 Thread Raymond Toy
-maxima-discuss I'll send the full log to you in a bit. I was using clang 15.0.4 on a Fedora 37 system, and I did CC=clang ./configure --prefix=$HOME On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 2:19 PM Camm Maguire wrote: > Greetings, and thanks so much as always for your feedback! > > Curious about clang -- w

Re: gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2022-12-21 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings, and thanks so much as always for your feedback! Curious about clang -- would love to see the whole build log. I just did a successful build on debian unstable with clang 1:14.0-55.3. Take care, Raymond Toy writes: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 12:37 PM Raymond Toy wrote: > > On Wed,

Re: gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2022-12-21 Thread Raymond Toy
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 12:37 PM Raymond Toy wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 9:23 AM Camm Maguire > wrote: > >> Greetings, and thanks so much for your feedback! >> >> My strong guess is that you are using gcc-12. There is a known bug >> therein preventing gcl from using it until fixed. I

Re: gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2022-12-21 Thread Raymond Toy
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 9:23 AM Camm Maguire wrote: > Greetings, and thanks so much for your feedback! > > My strong guess is that you are using gcc-12. There is a known bug > therein preventing gcl from using it until fixed. I anticipate this > won't take too long, so have not put any configur

Re: gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2022-12-21 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings, and thanks so much for your feedback! My strong guess is that you are using gcc-12. There is a known bug therein preventing gcl from using it until fixed. I anticipate this won't take too long, so have not put any configure checks etc. in the way. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr

Re: gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2022-12-21 Thread Raymond Toy
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 10:58 AM Camm Maguire < c...@transcendence.maguirefamily.org> wrote: > > Greetings! The GCL team is happy to announce the release of version > 2.6.13, the latest achievement in the 'stable' (as opposed to > 'development') series. Please see http://www.gnu.org/software/gcl

Re: gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2022-12-21 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Yes, the upload still seems stuck in the ftp-upload queue, but all feedback thus far indicates a successful installation: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/ftp-upload-report/2022-12/msg00062.html I'm hoping it appears in a few days, but in the meantime you can checkout tag Version_2_

Re: gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2022-12-21 Thread Andrey G. Grozin
On Tue, 20 Dec 2022, Camm Maguire wrote: Here are the compressed sources and a GPG detached signature: https://www.gnu.org/software/gcl//gcl-2.6.13.tar.gz https://www.gnu.org/software/gcl//gcl-2.6.13.tar.gz.sig grozin@bilbo ~ $ wget https://www.gnu.org/software/gcl//gcl-2.6.13.tar.gz --2022-12

gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

2022-12-20 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! The GCL team is happy to announce the release of version 2.6.13, the latest achievement in the 'stable' (as opposed to 'development') series. Please see http://www.gnu.org/software/gcl for downloading information. This release consolidates several years of work on GCL internals, perf