Does whether we call it 3.7 or 4.0 affect how long 3.6 is supported ?
I don't think Alan's comment would suggest that the next feature version
planned for may would be called other than 3.7.0. IMHO there should be
more substantial breaking changes to call it 4.0 than just what is
discussed
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023, Alan Snow wrote:
I think that this is a good change. However, I recommend making this change
associated with the GDAL 4.0 release as it is likely going to break
existing codebases.
Does whether we call it 3.7 or 4.0 affect how long 3.6 is supported ?
--
Andrew C.
Filed as https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/7484 : At first sight the
issue is that file uses TIFFTAG_RESOLUTIONUNIT=3 (pixels/cm), whereas
the current code only deals with TIFFTAG_RESOLUTIONUNIT=2 (pixels/inch)
Le 20/03/2023 à 22:09, Rahkonen Jukka a écrit :
Hi,
I noticed this question
Folks,
As long as there is a clear path to disabling python exception handling
fairly cleanly I can live with it. Like Kurt, we have a large code base
using GDAL mostly without exceptions enabled for GDAL.
If there is going to be a change, I also agree 4.0 is the time to do it.
Best regards,
Hi,
I noticed this question in gis.stackexchange
https://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/455609/warping-arcgis-9-2-georeferenced-tiffs-using-gdal-warp.
It seems that GDAL cannot interpret right the ground control points which are
stored into the aux.xml file. I can see that the support for
We are heavy users of the swig bindings. We have some Fiona users and are
only just now in the process of starting to use rasterio. We have only 3
instances of calling UseExceptions. Turning on UseExceptions
immediately blew up a bunch of my tests that were making incorrect
assumptions. Nothing
I think that this is a good change. However, I recommend making this change
associated with the GDAL 4.0 release as it is likely going to break
existing codebases.
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023, 12:58 PM Howard Butler wrote:
>
>
> > On Mar 19, 2023, at 7:34 AM, Even Rouault
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> On Mar 19, 2023, at 7:34 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've prepared a pull request that does the above, but this raises a number of
> questions. See my longish comment at
> https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/7475#issuecomment-1475239852. Thoughts
> appreciated
First off, thank
