I'm running on a RHEL5.2 linux box.
-Original Message-
From: William Kyngesburye [mailto:wokl...@kyngchaos.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 5:07 PM
To: Ethan Alpert
Cc: Even Rouault; gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] autotest 1.6 errors - need help
I haven
.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] autotest 1.6 errors - need help
On Dec 1, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
Yes, ILI/IOM has been fixed, but the GML driver has also been
changed so that
it behaves correctly with Xerces 3.0. I can confirm that GDAL
1.6.0RC2 passes
the GML autotest when compil
g] On Behalf Of William
Kyngesburye
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 8:13 PM
To: Even Rouault
Cc: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] autotest 1.6 errors - need help
On Dec 1, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
> Yes, ILI/IOM has been fixed, but the GML driver has also been
>
The configured GRASS prefix is already compiled into the OGR GRASS
driver as GRASS_GISBASE, why not do the same for the GDAL GRASS
driver? (I thought it was, but GRASS_GISBASE only turns up in
ogrgrassdatasource.cpp).
On Dec 3, 2008, at 12:47 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
William,
thanks for
William,
thanks for your testing and reporting!
I reproduced the issue myself and finally figured out the solution... that I
had myself forgotten after adding this test a few months ago.
You have to define the GISBASE environment variable so that it points to the
root of your GRASS install. Fo
On Dec 1, 2008, at 11:30 AM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
- gdrivers/grass
TEST: grass_2 ...
old = PROJCS["UTM Zone 18, Northern Hemisphere",
GEOGCS["grs80",
DATUM["North_American_Datum_1983",
SPHEROID["Geodetic_Reference_System_1980",
6378137,298.257222101],
TOWGS8
On Dec 1, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
Yes, ILI/IOM has been fixed, but the GML driver has also been
changed so that
it behaves correctly with Xerces 3.0. I can confirm that GDAL
1.6.0RC2 passes
the GML autotest when compiled and run against xerces-3.0.0 (x86
Linux).
Are you sure
On Dec 1, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
I think all that addressed was setting some macro so that ILI/IOM
would compile.
Yes, ILI/IOM has been fixed, but the GML driver has also been
changed so that
it behaves correctly with Xerces 3.0. I can confirm that GDAL
1.6.0RC2 passes
the
Le Monday 01 December 2008 18:43:52 William Kyngesburye, vous avez écrit :
> On Dec 1, 2008, at 11:30 AM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> > William Kyngesburye wrote:
> >> I'm working on some autotest errors for 1.6, and I need some help
> >> to figure out how to fix them.
> >> - ogr_gml
> >> TEST: ogr_g
On Dec 1, 2008, at 11:30 AM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
William Kyngesburye wrote:
I'm working on some autotest errors for 1.6, and I need some help
to figure out how to fix them.
- ogr_gml
TEST: ogr_gml_1 ... ERROR 1: element missing value.
fail (blowup)
Traceback (most recent call last):
Fil
William Kyngesburye wrote:
I'm working on some autotest errors for 1.6, and I need some help to
figure out how to fix them.
- ogr_gml
TEST: ogr_gml_1 ... ERROR 1: element missing value.
fail (blowup)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "pymod/gdaltest.py", line 89, in run_tests
re
William Kyngesburye wrote:
On Nov 30, 2008, at 4:03 PM, William Kyngesburye wrote:
- tiff_write
TEST: tiff_write_55 ... PROJCS["Equirectangular
Mars",GEOGCS["GCS_Mars",DATUM["unknown",SPHEROID["unnamed",3394813.857975945,0]],PRIMEM["Greenwich",0],UNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433]],PROJECTION
On Nov 30, 2008, at 4:03 PM, William Kyngesburye wrote:
- tiff_write
TEST: tiff_write_55 ... PROJCS["Equirectangular
Mars",GEOGCS["GCS_Mars",DATUM["unknown",SPHEROID["unnamed",
3394813.857975945,0]],PRIMEM["Greenwich",0],UNIT["degree",
0.0174532925199433]],PROJECTION["Equirectangular"],PAR
13 matches
Mail list logo