It's a year of major version bump in GIS. Proj 6 (2x3), PostGIS 3, possibly
pgRouting 3. Three is a popular GIS version number this year.
I'd +1. Only question is whether you have plans for even more major API
breaks this year, so that 3.0 sticks for a little while.
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 4:56
+1 to calling it 3.0 and to your proposed plan.
Thank you Even.
Daniel
On 2019-05-01 14:56, Even Rouault wrote:
Hi,
As a feedback from the previous motion, it appears that GDAL 3.0 would
probably better reflect the API & behaviour changes that have been done,
and
be in accordance with
On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 04:56, Even Rouault wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> As a feedback from the previous motion, it appears that GDAL 3.0 would
>
> probably better reflect the API & behaviour changes that have been done, and
>
> be in accordance with our HOWTO-RELEASE procedure and semantic versionning
On Wed, 1 May 2019, 20:56 Even Rouault, wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> As a feedback from the previous motion, it appears that GDAL 3.0 would
>
> probably better reflect the API & behaviour changes that have been done,
> and
>
> be in accordance with our HOWTO-RELEASE procedure and semantic versionning
>
>
I like 3.0 as well. -jeff
On 2019-05-01 3:56 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
Hi,
As a feedback from the previous motion, it appears that GDAL 3.0 would
probably better reflect the API & behaviour changes that have been done,
and
be in accordance with our HOWTO-RELEASE procedure and semantic
+1 Calling it 3.0 would definitely help non-developers understand how
different/better things are.
On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 12:09 PM Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> Even,
>
> I think calling it 3.0 would be reasonable.
>
> Best regards,
> Frank
>
>
> On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 11:56 AM Even Rouault
>
Even,
I think calling it 3.0 would be reasonable.
Best regards,
Frank
On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 11:56 AM Even Rouault
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> As a feedback from the previous motion, it appears that GDAL 3.0 would
>
> probably better reflect the API & behaviour changes that have been done,
> and
>
>
Hi,
As a feedback from the previous motion, it appears that GDAL 3.0 would
probably better reflect the API & behaviour changes that have been done,
and
be in accordance with our HOWTO-RELEASE procedure and semantic versionning
rules.
I'm OK with that change.
If we decide for that, the
On mercredi 1 mai 2019 14:22:37 CEST Daniel Morissette wrote:
> I have been wondering about calling it 3.0 as well. How much
> communication about 2.5 are you alluding to?
Here, a few blog posts, twitter, a few bug trackers of other projects. Not a
massive PR campaign on TV for sure :-)
>
> Is
I have been wondering about calling it 3.0 as well. How much
communication about 2.5 are you alluding to?
Is it more work to relay that 2.5 had a very short lifespan (i.e. never
released) and then we went straight to 3.0, or to spend the next few
years explaining why 2.4 and 2.5 are not
On mercredi 1 mai 2019 12:05:20 CEST Norman Barker wrote:
> Hi Even,
>
> who is eligible to vote? FWIW I am +1 if I am eligible.
This is mentionned in the project steering committee rules of
https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc1_pmc
"6. Anyone may comment on proposals on the list, but only
Sean,
>
> Did you give any more thought to calling this release 3.0 because of the
> breaking changes? Too late for that?
Yes, that would be a bit annoying to rename it now, at least in terms of
communication since GDAL 2.5 is already known to be the version with the SRS
revamp. Would have
+1 kurt
On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 7:56 AM Even Rouault
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Motion: GDAL/OGR 2.5.0 rc1 is promoted to be the official 2.5.0 final
> release.
>
> ---
>
> My vote: +1
>
> ---
>
> A few bugs were discovered since rc1 (one of them in the new TileDB
> driver),
> but none of them are
On 2019-05-01 11:56 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
Hi,
Motion: GDAL/OGR 2.5.0 rc1 is promoted to be the official 2.5.0 final release.
+1 jeff
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Hi Even,
who is eligible to vote? FWIW I am +1 if I am eligible.
Norman
On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 9:56 AM Even Rouault
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Motion: GDAL/OGR 2.5.0 rc1 is promoted to be the official 2.5.0 final
> release.
>
> ---
>
> My vote: +1
>
> ---
>
> A few bugs were discovered since
Even,
Did you give any more thought to calling this release 3.0 because of the
breaking changes? Too late for that?
On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 8:56 AM Even Rouault
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Motion: GDAL/OGR 2.5.0 rc1 is promoted to be the official 2.5.0 final
> release.
>
> ---
>
> My vote: +1
>
>
Hi,
Motion: GDAL/OGR 2.5.0 rc1 is promoted to be the official 2.5.0 final release.
---
My vote: +1
---
A few bugs were discovered since rc1 (one of them in the new TileDB driver),
but none of them are 2.5 specific regressions, so this is just business as
usual and fixes will go into
17 matches
Mail list logo
