Hi,
Do we have any libraries to get the tiles other than mercantile?
mercantile is having one method - mercantile.tiles(*bounds, zooms=[18])
Which is accepting only bounds in bbox format.
Our requirement is to pass the irregular polygon and get the tiles.
Thanks
Rajesh
--
Sent from:
Hi Sean,
That's perfectly clear and that's what I feared! I'll try to deal with that
before processing my data with gdal_rasterize.
All the best,
Hug
--
Hugues François [ mailto:prenom@inrae.fr ]
IR - Administrateur de la BD Stations / StationoScope
Hi Hug,
GDALRasterizeGeometries takes an array of geometries and iterates over them
from start to end, burning them into the raster one at a time. With a
strictly ordered vector layer, you can expect the later shapes to be burned
over the earlier ones.
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 7:00 AM Hugues
Le 04/03/2021 à 17:32, Even Rouault a écrit :
Hi,
Updating my yesterday motion with the feedback received (only second
bullet updated with a more restricted set of drivers)
Motion:
- remove the vector drivers BNA, AeronavFAA, HTF, OpenAir, SEGUKOOA,
SEGY, SUA, XPlane and raster drivers
+1
-Jukka Rahkonen-
Even Rouault-2 wrote
> Hi,
>
> Having heard no issues being reported regarding RC1
>
> Motion:
>
> Adopt GDAL 3.2.2 RC1 as final 3.2.2 release
>
> Starting with my +1
>
> Even
>
> --
> http://www.spatialys.com
>
> ___
>
Hello,
I don't know exactly where I should ask this question and I wasn't able to find
the answer when searching on the internet (maybe I didn't use the right
keywords).
I have to rasterize a vector layer, made of polygons, which resolution is finer
than the destination raster I have to use
+1 jeff
On 2021-03-08 9:56 a.m., Even Rouault wrote:
Hi,
Having heard no issues being reported regarding RC1
Motion:
Adopt GDAL 3.2.2 RC1 as final 3.2.2 release
Starting with my +1
Even
--
Jeff McKenna
GatewayGeo: Developers of MS4W, MapServer Consulting and Training
co-founder of
Hi,
Having heard no issues being reported regarding RC1
Motion:
Adopt GDAL 3.2.2 RC1 as final 3.2.2 release
Starting with my +1
Even
--
http://www.spatialys.com
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Hi Andrew,
On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 14:36, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> If, in five, ten, fifteen or even twenty five years, I don't have
> hardware that can run an existing docker image, then I'm less sure that
> docker is the answer. Will I have to rely on someone having made that
> Apple-ARM
