Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.8.1 RC1 is available, and motion to approve it
Le 24/11/2023 à 14:34, Sebastiaan Couwenberg via gdal-dev a écrit : On 11/24/23 13:22, Hernán De Angelis via gdal-dev wrote: May be this is of help: I have seen the case of the .py utilities not been compiled and installed a couple of times when I mistakenly had two Python versions present and acccessible. There is an issue with setuptools silently failing with python3.12: https://bugs.debian.org/1055682 This looks like a Debian specific issue. I can't replicate that locally with a manually built python 3.12.0 (cf https://gist.github.com/rouault/10096d152198a837ba3200af3cec04a9). It also works fine on Fedora Rawhide: cf https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/actions/runs/6981942751/job/1994023?pr=8812 I've tried in a debian:unstable Docker image, and I indeed reproduce the issue. I believe I've fixed that in https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/8812 (as well as not ignoring the installation failure). It seemed due to the fact that we previously add to define SETUPTOOLS_USE_DISTUTILS=stdlib to make things work, and apparently this is no longer needed. I'll let you cherry-pick those changes (https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/8812/commits/11cd5251e3166648ab51ca499468d0b144fcbfe9 and https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/8812/commits/248d7809a46d2fefd7fe320b434182ebe2805ca7), as I'll likely will not issue a RC3 for that. Even -- http://www.spatialys.com My software is free, but my time generally not. ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.8.1 RC1 is available, and motion to approve it
On 11/24/23 13:22, Hernán De Angelis via gdal-dev wrote: May be this is of help: I have seen the case of the .py utilities not been compiled and installed a couple of times when I mistakenly had two Python versions present and acccessible. There is an issue with setuptools silently failing with python3.12: https://bugs.debian.org/1055682 Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.8.1 RC1 is available, and motion to approve it
On 11/24/23 13:16, Even Rouault via gdal-dev wrote: The Python utilities are no longer installed with the .py extension, this broke their use in QGIS when we removed this in the Debian package some time ago. Don't know if that's still the case. Either way, this doesn't seem like an appropriate change for a .1 patch release. Are you sure about the .py utilities no longer be installed? Because, I see both /usr/bin/gdal2tiles and /usr/bin/gdal2tiles.py installed on Ubuntu 22.04 (before I reverted the change to add the launcher scripts) Both are installed indeed. I overlooked this when dh_missing failed on the executables without extension. Installing usr/bin/__init__ is still wrong though. Skipping __init__.py when creating the console_scripts list may suffice. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.8.1 RC1 is available, and motion to approve it
May be this is of help: I have seen the case of the .py utilities not been compiled and installed a couple of times when I mistakenly had two Python versions present and acccessible. /H. Den 2023-11-24 kl. 13:16, skrev Even Rouault via gdal-dev: Bas, The Python utilities are no longer installed with the .py extension, this broke their use in QGIS when we removed this in the Debian package some time ago. Don't know if that's still the case. Either way, this doesn't seem like an appropriate change for a .1 patch release. Are you sure about the .py utilities no longer be installed? Because, I see both /usr/bin/gdal2tiles and /usr/bin/gdal2tiles.py installed on Ubuntu 22.04 (before I reverted the change to add the launcher scripts) Even ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.8.1 RC1 is available, and motion to approve it
Bas, The Python utilities are no longer installed with the .py extension, this broke their use in QGIS when we removed this in the Debian package some time ago. Don't know if that's still the case. Either way, this doesn't seem like an appropriate change for a .1 patch release. Are you sure about the .py utilities no longer be installed? Because, I see both /usr/bin/gdal2tiles and /usr/bin/gdal2tiles.py installed on Ubuntu 22.04 (before I reverted the change to add the launcher scripts) Even -- http://www.spatialys.com My software is free, but my time generally not. ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.8.1 RC1 is available, and motion to approve it
On 11/23/23 22:56, Even Rouault via gdal-dev wrote: From a packaging point of view, the following change might have impacts on build recipes: The Python utilities are no longer installed with the .py extension, this broke their use in QGIS when we removed this in the Debian package some time ago. Don't know if that's still the case. Either way, this doesn't seem like an appropriate change for a .1 patch release. usr/bin/__init__ is now also installed which not correct. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
