From: Even Rouault [mailto:even.roua...@spatialys.com]
> I just planted the seed. Contributions (preferably as pull requests)
> welcome...
Ok just did that PR #411.
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailma
> I would recommend that Layers::iterator is updated to conform to the C++
> iterator concepts (to the very least to the InputIterator concept).
It
> still requires the following:
> - five typedefs (value_type, reference, pointer, iterator_category,
> difference_type)
- three constructors (defa
> Even:
> In fact the nature of the object which is returned depends on the iterator,
> and as documented in the API, for the sake of implementation simplicity,
> those iterators do not necessarily respect the whole semantics of iterators.
I don't think that is necessary, at least in the case of
On 11 April 2018 at 14:40, Even Rouault wrote:
> On mercredi 11 avril 2018 05:10:53 CEST Kurt Schwehr wrote:
>> The auto&& is really confusing.
>
> A experimentally working alternative with miminal use of '&' is
>
> for( auto poLayer: poDS->GetLayers() ) <-- this is a plain OGRLayer*
IMHO, i
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 8:40 AM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> On mercredi 11 avril 2018 05:10:53 CEST Kurt Schwehr wrote:
> > The auto&& is really confusing.
>
> A experimentally working alternative with miminal use of '&' is
>
> for( auto poLayer: poDS->GetLayers() ) <-- this is a plain OGRLayer*
On mercredi 11 avril 2018 05:10:53 CEST Kurt Schwehr wrote:
> The auto&& is really confusing.
A experimentally working alternative with miminal use of '&' is
for( auto poLayer: poDS->GetLayers() ) <-- this is a plain OGRLayer*
{
for( auto& poFeature: *poLayer ) <-- this is a uni
The auto&& is really confusing.
-kurt
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 2:41 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> On 10 April 2018 at 23:06, Even Rouault
> wrote:
> > On mardi 10 avril 2018 22:34:56 CEST Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> >> On 10 April 2018 at 22:06, Even Rouault
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Just wanted to adv
On 10 April 2018 at 23:06, Even Rouault wrote:
> On mardi 10 avril 2018 22:34:56 CEST Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> On 10 April 2018 at 22:06, Even Rouault wrote:
>> >
>> > Just wanted to advertize the recent new introduction of C++ iterators
>> > (...)
>>
>> Good one, thanks!
>>
>> > for( auto&&
On mardi 10 avril 2018 22:34:56 CEST Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> On 10 April 2018 at 22:06, Even Rouault wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just wanted to advertize the recent new introduction of C++ iterators
> > (...)
>
> Good one, thanks!
>
> > for( auto&& poLayer: poDS->GetLayers() )
>
> Do the iterat
On 10 April 2018 at 22:06, Even Rouault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just wanted to advertize the recent new introduction of C++ iterators (...)
Good one, thanks!
> for( auto&& poLayer: poDS->GetLayers() )
Do the iterators return a proxy reference hence the tutorial prefers
auto&& over plain auto&?
(ie
10 matches
Mail list logo
