Re: [gdal-dev] spatialite on Debian: neither lwgeom nor rttopo

2018-02-19 Thread Tobias Wendorff
Am Mo, 19.02.2018, 16:01 schrieb Bas Couwenberg: > Packages involved in the circular dependency cannot be updated because > the old versions are kept around. > > See: [snip] Thanks for your kind and detailed explanation. I will continue to build and use it in a chroot :)

Re: [gdal-dev] spatialite on Debian: neither lwgeom nor rttopo

2018-02-19 Thread Bas Couwenberg
On 2018-02-19 15:40, Tobias Wendorff wrote: Am Mo, 19.02.2018, 07:40 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg: lwgeom support was disabled to untangle the circular dependency as documented in the spatialite changelog: - Drop build dependency on liblwgeom-dev to untangle spatialite->postgis->gdal->spat

Re: [gdal-dev] spatialite on Debian: neither lwgeom nor rttopo

2018-02-19 Thread Tobias Wendorff
Hi Sebastiaan, Am Mo, 19.02.2018, 07:40 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg: > lwgeom support was disabled to untangle the circular dependency as > documented in the spatialite changelog: > > - Drop build dependency on liblwgeom-dev to untangle >spatialite->postgis->gdal->spatialite circular depend

Re: [gdal-dev] spatialite on Debian: neither lwgeom nor rttopo

2018-02-18 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 02/18/2018 11:18 PM, Tobias Wendorff wrote: > Did anyone recognize that stable and unstable Debian neither builds > lwgeom nor rttopo in libspatialite by default? lwgeom support was disabled to untangle the circular dependency as documented in the spatialite changelog: - Drop build dependency