Le 04/05/2011 23:00, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
Hi,
any objections in increasing the GTK minimum requirement of Geany to
GTK 2.12 (and GLib 2.16)?
[...]
Any new on the subject? Should we go on an start moving?
Cheers,
Colomban
___
Geany-devel
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:45:38 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Le 04/05/2011 23:00, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
Hi,
any objections in increasing the GTK minimum requirement of Geany to
GTK 2.12 (and GLib 2.16)?
[...]
Any new on the subject? Should we go on an start moving?
Yeah, I'd say let's go!
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:26:06 +0200
Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:45:38 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Le 04/05/2011 23:00, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
Hi,
any objections in increasing the GTK minimum requirement of Geany
to GTK 2.12 (and GLib 2.16)?
Le 13/06/2011 18:55, Frank Lanitz a écrit :
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:26:06 +0200
Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:45:38 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Le 04/05/2011 23:00, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
Hi,
any objections in increasing the GTK minimum requirement of
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:38:23 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Le 13/06/2011 18:55, Frank Lanitz a écrit :
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:26:06 +0200
Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:45:38 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Le 04/05/2011 23:00, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
Hi,
any
Le 13/06/2011 19:45, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:38:23 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Le 13/06/2011 18:55, Frank Lanitz a écrit :
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:26:06 +0200
Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:45:38 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Le 04/05/2011
Hi developers,
As currently the dependencies for Geany are getting bumped to GTK 2.12
and GLIB 2.16 I'm wondering whether we should also bump dependencies of
current devel version of geany-plugins to Geany 0.21 and with this step
also to this versions of GTK/glib?
Cheers,
Frank
--
Hi,
During the phase of removing code that is not relevant anymore since the
dependency bump, I fatally came out to write_data_to_disk(). Now we can
assume we have GIO, it may seem sensible to drop completely the C API
file saving code...
...However, GIO saving seems to cause some problems on
Hi Columban.
On 14 June 2011 08:54, Colomban Wendling lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Hi,
During the phase of removing code that is not relevant anymore since the
dependency bump, I fatally came out to write_data_to_disk(). Now we can
assume we have GIO, it may seem sensible to drop
