On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 12:07:23 +0200
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
just one very quick and possibly stupid idea. How about getting rid of
the 0 version prefix and calling the next release 1.0? This would be
just numbering change, not some milestone based on features that have
to be
On 20 September 2011 20:14, Jon Senior j...@restlesslemon.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 12:07:23 +0200
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
just one very quick and possibly stupid idea. How about getting rid of
the 0 version prefix and calling the next release 1.0? This would be
just
Hi,
Am 20.09.2011 12:07, schrieb Jiří Techet:
just one very quick and possibly stupid idea. How about getting rid of
the 0 version prefix and calling the next release 1.0?
To make it short: As we are about two weeks ahead of next release I
disagree. After 0.21 release we got a lot of
On 20 September 2011 21:23, Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote:
Hi,
Am 20.09.2011 12:07, schrieb Jiří Techet:
just one very quick and possibly stupid idea. How about getting rid of
the 0 version prefix and calling the next release 1.0?
To make it short: As we are about two weeks ahead
Am Di, 20.09.2011, 13:43 schrieb Lex Trotman:
On 20 September 2011 21:23, Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote:
Hi,
Am 20.09.2011 12:07, schrieb Ji?í Techet:
just one very quick and possibly stupid idea. How about getting rid of
the 0 version prefix and calling the next release 1.0?
To
Hi
But why only 1.0?
GNOME 3.*
KDE 4.*
Scite 2.*
What about Geany 3000? Or some kind of other stupid release name like
''busel', 'verabei', 'krumkach' ...
Best regards,
Yura Siamashka
On 20/09/2011, Thomas Martitz thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote:
Am Di, 20.09.2011, 13:43 schrieb
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 12:07:23 +0200
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
How about getting rid of the 0 version prefix and calling the next
release 1.0?
+1.0 :) Much more reliable that my primary IDE, which is version 5.
Though I'd prefer to see stash-tree-display-5923.diff (from the last
Am 19.09.2011 11:13, schrieb Lex Trotman:
On 19 September 2011 18:38, Alexander Petukhovde...@apetukhov.ru wrote:
I would like to store debugger settings such as watches, breaks, target etc
in a project file.
These are not the settings that apply to a plugin in a whole but look like
being
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote:
Am 20.09.2011 12:07, schrieb Jiří Techet:
just one very quick and possibly stupid idea. How about getting rid of
the 0 version prefix and calling the next release 1.0?
To make it short: As we are about two weeks ahead
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:10:34 +0300, Yura wrote:
Hi
But why only 1.0?
GNOME 3.*
KDE 4.*
Scite 2.*
What about Geany 3000? Or some kind of other stupid release name like
''busel', 'verabei', 'krumkach' ...
Heh, I like krumkach, sounds in German quite funny :).
More seriously, I personally don't
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:45:04 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Hi guys,
[skip ChangeLog, maybe use something auto-generated]
while I was sticking long time to our ChangeLog format and workflow,
in the meantime I think we could indeed drop it, that is, drop it in
the (D)VCS.
Just auto-generate it for
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Jon Senior j...@restlesslemon.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 12:07:23 +0200
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
just one very quick and possibly stupid idea. How about getting rid of
the 0 version prefix and calling the next release 1.0? This
12 matches
Mail list logo
