On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:56:06 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> >> [PATCH 1/3] Add a signal that is emitted before build starts
>
> I want to be able to save all project files before the build starts.
> Currently geany saves only the active file but does nothing with the
> other open files, so you may b
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:20:42 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> >>> [PATCH 1/3] Add a signal that is emitted before build starts
> >
> > I want to be able to save all project files before the build starts.
> > Currently geany saves only the active file but does nothing with the
> > other open files, so y
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 21:49:03 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> The following patches are required by gproject to build and
> run correctly. More details in the individual patches.
>
> [PATCH 1/3] Add a signal that is emitted before build starts
> [PATCH 2/3] Make it possible to fill some fields of find
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 09:06:45 +0400
Eugene Arshinov wrote:
> > > Here are two trivial patches to add indication to status bar or
> > > title. I think indication is needed as sometimes it's still
> > > important for user to distinguish main and secondary instances.
> > > Personally I vote for indi
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:48:34 +0100
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> Hello
>
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 8:58 PM, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> > Happy updating! :-)
> >
> With the new plugins (previously I was running SVN plug-ins and Geany
> 0.19) and Geany 0.19 I am getting the following error-like message:
.
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:22:05 +0200
Enrico Tröger wrote:
> > > > > I have a few years of daily experience both with SVN and GIT.
> > > > > We use SVN at work and I use GIT for all my personal projects.
> > > > > I like GIT better than SVN.
> > > > >
> > > > > In my humble opinion you shouldn't sw
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:10:57 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> > Otherwise it's a mess e.g. with project indentation settings.
>
> Glad you said it first, I feel I have been too negative in the past
I didn't mean Geany's implementation is a mess, I meant if a plugin
overrode the project support it wou
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:48:39 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> > I agree it helps, but are there really no successful widespread
> > languages that didn't have corporate backing?
> >
>
> Unfortunately we're not living in the 70's or 80's, where the best had
> a chance, and there's a lot of software wri
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:24:39 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> 1. the GeanyProject structure should be private for the project
> implementation and contain those things that are relevant to the
> session-project (I have similar private structure for my project)
> 2. app->project should contain a structu
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:59:11 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> >> >> What I would suggest is that upon project creation you make a complete
> >> >> copy
> >> >
> >> > Thats just what I didn't want to do, remember there are filetype
> >> > commands and execute commands too makes each project copy big.
>
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:28:42 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> >> Go is not a good replacement for C++, try D. Some people say Go is a
> >> good replacement for C.
> >
> > And some people say that it has sadly made some decisions that prevent
> > it being that, but with Google behind it it may succeed a
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:21:27 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> Imagine you have:
>
> foo.h:
> void foo(void);
>
> foo.c:
> #include "foo.h"
>
> void foo(void)
> {
> printf("foo");
> }
>
> main.c:
> #include "foo.h"
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> foo();
> return 0;
> }
>
> This is
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 23:23:21 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> > Go is not a good replacement for C++, try D. Some people say Go is a
> > good replacement for C.
>
> And some people say that it has sadly made some decisions that prevent
> it being that, but with Google behind it it may succeed anyway,
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:33:44 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 13:05, Nick Treleaven
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 21:40:58 +0200
> > Jiří Techet wrote:
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Jiří Techet
> >> ---
> >> src/plugindata.h
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 21:40:57 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> There is a 600ms interval in which the panel displaying the current file
> name isn't displayed. If you switch tabs with a keybinding and do it
> too quickly (press it twice in the 600ms period), the wrong file is
> put on top of the stack.
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:44:24 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> >> Yes, it's pretty confusing. Once you create a project you don't expect
> >> that what you see in the build tab changes based on what change you
> >> make in the global settings (until you modify the commands in the
> >> project for the fi
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 21:40:58 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jiří Techet
> ---
> src/plugindata.h |2 ++
> + gint plugin_version_check(gint abi_ver);\
> gint plugin_version_check(gint abi_ver) \
> { \
Why is this necessary?
Regards,
Nick
_
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:44:24 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> > And you program in C++ !! I'd have thought overriding some entries
> > only would be easy to understand :-)
>
> Yes, but I didn't say I like C++ - I don't. The language is made in a
> completely wrong way. Unfortunately the fact is that i
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 18:48:51 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> >> > BTW, why do you destroy the dialog instead of hiding it?
> >>
> >> It's just that I can write
> >>
> >> if (switch_dialog)
> >>
> >> instead of
> >>
> >> if (switch_dialog && GTK_WIDGET_VISIBLE(switch_dialog))
> >>
> >> but I can change
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 15:10:22 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> > BTW, why do you destroy the dialog instead of hiding it?
>
> It's just that I can write
>
> if (switch_dialog)
>
> instead of
>
> if (switch_dialog && GTK_WIDGET_VISIBLE(switch_dialog))
>
> but I can change that if your preference is d
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 18:59:35 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> To be honest, I find the new build dialog in 0.19 (and how it
> interacts with the session-project) pretty confusing - when you use it
> for the first time, you have no idea what it does (I had to look at
> the sources to be sure).
I assume
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:11:48 +0200
Thomas Martitz wrote:
> Am 09.06.2010 03:40, schrieb Lex Trotman:
> > Sure its easier if everyone is using git, but ATM this is an SVN project.
> >
>
> Although most, if not all, geany developers use git, don't they?
Do you mean git-svn? The Git repo is no
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 23:22:51 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> The update to the build system is to support running any commands,
> make,nmake, waf, scons, cmake, ant, bjam, my_favourite_shell_script
> etc so the "Non-filetype commands" can't be called "make commands"
> anymore, and unfortunately the na
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 15:36:32 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> > It's pretty clear from the GIT page that it's a read-only mirror. We
> > don't have a writable GIT repo.
> >
>
> OK, I've just noticed:
>
> "Read-only mirrors of the SVN repositories, updated shortly after real
> commits in the SVN reposi
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 13:06:45 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> > Sure its easier if everyone is using git, but ATM this is an SVN project.
> >
>
> It's true that I've used the workflow typical for a git project - from
> geany web page, which offers both git and SVN repository I assumed
> that I can chos
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 23:38:19 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> * for big projects I'd like to create some basic ctags support. The
> tag manager used by geany is totally unusable for big projects because
> building the object hierarchy has quadratic to exponential complexity.
> I need a simple tag suppor
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 18:59:35 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> And this fix should definitely go to 0.19:
>
> http://gitorious.org/~techy/geany/techys-geany/commit/62deb4ec5c2b8de4d0979c55f853f529efde223f
>
> I think I didn't properly describe this one in the commit log - there
> is a 600ms interval in
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 11:12:09 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> if you are adding a command line
> option why not make it one to allow the user to add whatever options
> they want to replace the undef.
I think this is already possible by preprocessing headers yourself:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/inde
Hi all,
Just a quick mail to let everyone know we're planning to make a Geany
0.19 release once everything is ready. We're thinking of early June but
this may change ;-)
So if anyone wants to help test the SVN version, now's a good time to
do so:
http://www.geany.org/Download/SVN
That link also h
Hi,
Sorry for the late reply (the thread subject wasn't too specific ;-))
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:26:23 +0100
Enrico Tröger wrote:
> >> The feature request, if I interpret it correctly, was for a new
> >> menu under Tools that listed all template files so that they could
> >> be selected for ed
On Mon, 03 May 2010 18:50:07 +0200
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> >> Since there is currently no symbols_* functions exported to the plugin
> >> API I don't know if you think it is a good idea, but if a patch that
> >> adds SymbolsFuncs and symbols_get_context_separator() (and more if
> >> needed) wo
On Sat, 01 May 2010 20:28:42 +0200
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Since there is currently no symbols_* functions exported to the plugin
> API I don't know if you think it is a good idea, but if a patch that
> adds SymbolsFuncs and symbols_get_context_separator() (and more if
> needed) would be appli
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 20:59:40 +0200
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> I attach a patch that adds sci_get_line_indentation() and
> sci_set_line_indentation() to the plugin API. I don't need the latter
Thanks, committed.
> but I have added it because I think they goes quite together; but if you
> don't t
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 19:13:25 +0200
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> > Can you give a code example of what you're trying to do?
> The real code can be found only through SF's VC viewer:
> http://geany-plugins.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/geany-plugins/trunk/geanygendoc/src/ggd.c?revision=1316&view=markup#
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 17:46:45 +0200
Enrico Tröger wrote:
> >Yes, I think it could be a (hidden?) option at least until it got fixed
> >at the GTK level. Note that anyway it is only available if Geany was
> >compiled against GTK >= 2.12.
>
> Which is probably true for most Geany users (using GTK >
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:28:02 +0200
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> In my GeanyGenDoc plugin I was using sci_insert_text() to insert the
> generated documentation comment; but I wanted to be able to indent the
> inserted comment to follow the indentation at the insertion position.
>
> I found editor_i
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 23:56:35 +0200
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> * the stash_group_add_entry() and its widget_id. The thing is that when
> it is a string it should be constant, but when it is a widget it
> shouldn't be... perhaps it is fine as now.
I'm not sure what to do about this really.
Regard
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:51:58 +0200
Krasimir Angelov wrote:
> I use GTK 2.20.
From the ChangeLog:
Win32 – XP themes have been disabled since they don’t work
http://www.gtk.org/
Regards,
Nick
P.S. Please don't top-post ;-)
___
Geany-devel mailing list
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 22:13:08 +0300 (EEST)
Enzo Matrix wrote:
> http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/1553/geanytreebrowserplugin0.png
Wow, looks great ;-)
Regards,
Nick
___
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailm
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:51:58 +0200
Krasimir Angelov wrote:
> I use GTK 2.20. By the way I attached pictures of the two versions of
> the editor.
Just to check, do you use 2.20 for the development files as well, not
just runtime?
Regards,
Nick
___
Gean
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 19:27:25 +0200
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> vStringStripTrailing() reads outside its buffer when called on an empty
> vString [1]. Joined a trivial patch that fixes the problem.
Thanks, committed.
Regards,
Nick
___
Geany-devel mailin
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:56:15 +0200
Krasimir Angelov wrote:
> I successfully compiled and run Geany on Windows using MinGW. However
> I have a small problem. When I run the newly built Geany it uses
> different theme than the one that comes with the binary distribution
> of Geany. The binary distr
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:07:56 +0200
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> >> Ah, as we talk about compiler options, another think I like to add is
> >> -Werror-implicit-function-declaration (that, as its name suggests, take
> >> an implicit function declaration as an error), since such a situation is
> >> mo
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:35:17 +0200
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> >> [1] -Wall -W -O2 -Wunused -Wunreachable-code -Wformat=2 -Wundef -Wshadow
> >> -Wpointer-arith -Wbad-function-cast -Wwrite-strings -Wconversion
> >> -Waggregate-return -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
> >> -Wmissing-declarati
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:51:33 +0200
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm used to compile my programs with quite strict compiler options [1],
> and it made me see that the plugin API had some non-const arguments or
> field where it probably should have const ones - where string literals
> are mo
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:53:23 +0200
Thomas Martitz wrote:
> Am 20.04.2010 15:56, schrieb Nick Treleaven:
> > I think we should try to stay fairly compatible with CTags as other
> > projects use it also and may make improvements to their copies.
> >
> > But IMO it'
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:10:33 -0400
jordan wrote:
> How does Monodevelop handle it's tag manager as unlike Anjuta and Geany
> the tags always point to the correct line?
IDEs reparse the tags from memory in idle time.
Regards,
Nick
___
Geany-devel maili
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:51:04 +0200
Enrico Tröger wrote:
> >>> parser must care about buffer VS file, wouldn't it be good to
> >>> abstract this a little more? (with e.g. a little I/O layer - I
> >>> already started a small library to check if it would be easy to
> >>> emulate file I/O on buffer,
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 00:34:42 +0200
Enrico Tröger wrote:
> >For now the only defect I saw (with C) is with anonymous enumerations
> >and so (that are named anon_enum_NUM) with which the NUM increases at
> >each re-parsing (I use document_update_tag_list(doc, TRUE) to
> >re-parse); but I suppose it
Probably the backup file can be left as it is, so a user gets a copy of
> > his/her old data; those who are
> > annoyed with that can simply turn the option off.
> >
> > I've created a patch which requires some final testing; I'll send it today
> > or
Hi,
I added src/stash.h to the plugin API - see:
http://www.geany.org/manual/reference/stash_8h.html
http://www.geany.org/manual/reference/stash_8h.html#settings-example
When I have time I'll update a plugin to use it. Currently it's only
used in the core.
Comments welcome ;-)
Regards,
Nick
___
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:25:56 +0200
Enrico Tröger wrote:
> >For our uses I'm not sure if it affects performance much, but it would
> >be good to remove all FOO_GET_PRIVATE() macros from GObject code.
>
> Yes.
>
>
> >I removed this macro generation from the Class Builder plugin.
>
> Maybe we co
Hi,
As we have discussed a little whether project filetype commands are
worth having, I thought I'd share what I've begun to use them for
lately when working on Geany.
reStructuredText:
Manual make doc
Hacking make hacking-doc%p/doc directory
'Manual' is for when I'm editing doc/geany.tx
On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 12:41:13 +0100
Nick Treleaven wrote:
> > Btw, the bugs with GVFS didn't appear with GNOME 2.26 (and probably
> > before), so I think we can safely use fopen() and fprintf()/fwrite() there.
> > Then, your proposal about version separation (use
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 17:32:56 +
Nick Treleaven wrote:
> I've switched the regex engine for the find & replace dialog 'Use
> regular expressions' option. This is (potentially) more powerful and
> fixes some issues (see below).
I forgot to mention that \n (newlin
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:24:45 +0200
Dominic Hopf wrote:
> > It seems with 5.10 this module doesn't exist anymore or at least
> > isn't shipped anymore with the default Perl distribution.
> > But instead, Perl 5.10 has a -c command line option which also
> > does a syntax check. I guess this is eno
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:41:20 +0400
Алексей Антипов <1a_anti...@mail.ru> wrote:
> Btw, the bugs with GVFS didn't appear with GNOME 2.26 (and probably before),
> so I think we can safely use fopen() and fprintf()/fwrite() there. Then, your
> proposal about version separation (use GIO with GLib>=2.
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:11:15 +
Nick Treleaven wrote:
> > This patch actually reduced portability.
> >
> > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=787791&aid=2973764&group_id=153444
> >
> > Solutions would be welcome.
>
> I thin
Hi,
I randomly saw this:
http://blogs.gnome.org/jjardon/2010/03/30/improve-performance-use-priv-instead-get_priv-macros/
For our uses I'm not sure if it affects performance much, but it would
be good to remove all FOO_GET_PRIVATE() macros from GObject code.
I removed this macro generation from t
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:31:02 +0100
Enrico Tröger wrote:
> >>It's that Geany is built in a clean chroot build environment along
> >>with only the compilers and libs required. ``which`` is not a
> >>necessary build requirement IMHO. We should have a portable, standard,
> >>``configure`` that can bu
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:17:00 +0100
Michael Spahn wrote:
> Small SVN po.de Geany update.
> Have fun, maybe some better translations.
> Regards,
> Michael
Thanks. But try sending them to Frank as he's the translation
maintainer.
Regards,
Nick
___
Geany-
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:24:13 +0100
Enrico Tröger wrote:
> >Do we really want to force -O0 for wscript SVN builds?
>
> Nah, that was a funny mistake :).
> I committed the other changes of the revision 4763 and while waiting
> for the commit to finish, I added -O0 to test something and then
> acci
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:23:32 +0100
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> >> Here's a small patch that adds support for lambdas in the Python
> >> tagmanager. What it does it report Python's lambdas as functions (with
> >> arguments) rather than as variables. Nested lambda are supported too.
> >
> > I haven
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:07:05 +0100
Thomas Martitz wrote:
> > I haven't tried it but do we really want this? Aren't lambda functions
> > supposed to be short and limited to local scope? We don't parse other
> > local things other than nested functions, but they can be quite
> > long.
>
> Is this
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:29:48 +0100
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Here's a small patch that adds support for lambdas in the Python
> tagmanager. What it does it report Python's lambdas as functions (with
> arguments) rather than as variables. Nested lambda are supported too.
I haven't tried it but d
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:50:52 +0200 (EET)
Enzo Matrix wrote:
> Now i have problems with writing/reading an config options (just don`t know
> how to start, there is no integrated APIs for this)
> It will be really nice and useful if there are
> function in geany to write configs
> may be somethin
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:54:00 +0100
Thomas Martitz wrote:
> > Also, as I don't know Waf well, does it only support building with gcc?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Nick
> >
>
> I can't comment here, but the code at least looks like being generic.
I was thinking about the compiler flags, -g and -DFOO
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:06:29 +
eh...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Revision: 4763
> http://geany.svn.sourceforge.net/geany/?rev=4763&view=rev
> Author: eht16
> Date: 2010-03-15 14:06:29 + (Mon, 15 Mar 2010)
>
> Log Message:
> ---
> Fix/Improve GIT repository detec
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:31:22 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> >>> See attached screenshot - I set the AUTHORS filetype to XML but it
> >>> looks the same with filetype None too.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I'll see your screenshot and raise you a working one :-), see attached, I
> >> set fieltype to XML and as yo
Sorry for the noise, accidental Ctrl-Enter.
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:06:58 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> > Probably we can fix this to return "none" instead of "common" and
> > adjust all calling code to still work.
> >
>
> Or just store it in filetypes.common, doesn't matter so long as we write to
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:06:58 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 15 March 2010 23:21, Nick Treleaven wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 10:52:47 +1100
> > Lex Trotman wrote:
> >
> > > > > This is because executes are saved in the filetypes file and the
> &g
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:23:08 +0300
Eugene Arshinov wrote:
> When I said the frames being inconsistent, I meant that
> * some frames have zero border width while most of them have border
> width set to 5;
> * sometimes this border width is applied to each frame contained
> within a page, while
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 10:52:47 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> > > This is because executes are saved in the filetypes file and the function
> > > filetypes_save_commands() starts at index 1 not 0 so no commands are
> > saved
> > > for filetype none.
> > >
> > > Same happens for the filetype commands as
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:16:51 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> > There seems to be a bug in trunk if you edit an execute command field
> > then restart Geany, the changes aren't saved.
> I can only get it to fail if you set the commands when the filetype is none.
Sorry I forgot to mention that ;-) I o
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:29:53 +0100
Enrico Tröger wrote:
> >> I've made a screenshot (attached) of the Build Commands dialog using
> >> buttons for the menu item labels instead of text entries. This is
> >> because:
> >>
> >> 1. It makes it clear that menu labels don't normally need to be
> >> edi
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:13:59 -0600
Chuck Tilbury wrote:
> I had another problem with building the add-ons, though. After taking care
> of the dependencies given by ./configure, I tried to get and build
> the geany-plugins-0.18 files and many of the plugins refused to build
> because of inaccessi
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:05:45 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> >> I've made a screenshot (attached) of the Build Commands dialog using
> >> buttons for the menu item labels instead of text entries. This is
> >> because:
> >>
> >> 1. It makes it clear that menu labels don't normally need to be edited.
>
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:16:46 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 11 March 2010 04:53, Nick Treleaven wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:52:55 +1100
> > Lex Trotman wrote:
> >
> > > The current trunk arrangement has one major problem though, the project
> > >
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:52:55 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> The current trunk arrangement has one major problem though, the project
> settings and the non-project settings are configured in separate dialogs,
> having settings that interact in different places is very poor user
> interface design (whic
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:08:24 +
Nick Treleaven wrote:
> ...
> > I had to tamper GeanyEditor struct a bit. It seems to cause no troubles
> > for plugins as GeanyEditor is not exported. Fields 'long_line_*' are
> > renamed to corresponding 'long_
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 19:48:39 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> > ft is NULL there, which looks like a valid value, since ft is tested for
> > NULL explicitly in line 1878. So I propose the following patch.
...
> Thanks, one more change is needed, ft isn't initialised to NULL so on my
> machine it doesn'
Hi,
I've switched the regex engine for the find & replace dialog 'Use
regular expressions' option. This is (potentially) more powerful and
fixes some issues (see below).
Please test and give feedback, thanks.
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:56:05 +
nt...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Revision: 4746
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 11:41:22 +0100
Enrico Tröger wrote:
> I just updated our Scintilla copy to its latest version 2.03.
> This brings some bugfixes but most importantly it adds a new feature:
> virtual spaces.
Great, this really improves column-mode editing, thanks. And we finally
get a multiline
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 11:44:33 +0100
Enrico Tröger wrote:
> Hey Jon,
>
>
> while updating Geany's copy of Scintilla, I noticed we are using a
> different version of the Markdown lexer than the one in Scintilla.
> What's the better/newer/fancier one?
>
> I didn't have a closer look at the differen
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 19:20:37 +0100
Enrico Tröger wrote:
> >You put a weird pattern:
> >[public|protected|private|static]*
> >If you wanted to group, you should use ()
>
> I didn't want to group, we don't need to know the actual modifier, we
> just want to allow only this subset. And yes, it was a
On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:50:28 +0100
Thomas Martitz wrote:
> >> (If a second instance of geany is run without passing filenames to the
> >> first, -i is implied).
> >>
> >>
> > I really like this idea. It is simple to understand, rather
> > convenient and uniform with the behaviour of "new-in
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 05:28:32 -0800 (PST)
Can Koy wrote:
> Anybody working on improving PHP parser in tagmanager?
> If not, I intend to have a look at it this weekend. Primary objective is to
> add calltips.
> I could use some example code or any other pointer about regex callbacks in
> ctags (ot
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:52:55 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> > Hmm, this seems quite complicated. You know we accept current trunk as
> > good, no need to rethink everything.
> >
>
> It is actually slightly simpler than current trunk.
...
> > > 1. edit each of the "make" commands individually (0.18.1
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 15:23:24 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> I've just merged trunk into bs2 branch and of course got a conflict on the
> Changelog file.
>
> What was the decision on what to do with branch changelogs, I can't
> remember?
I think for the branch changelog it's up to the branch develope
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 13:07:55 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> Well, since the question is "Try to resave the file?" I'd suggest that
> GTK_STOCK_YES and GTK_STOCK_NO be used since they are a more direct answer
> to the question than apply/cancel are. And that makes the mnemonics
> different.
>
> What
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:21:27 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:54:31 +0000
> > Nick Treleaven wrote:
> >
> > > > Makes the plugin much bigger and also requires more of the build
> > >
> > > Makes the core smaller ;-)
> >
&g
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:05:12 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> > To be easy to implement, perhaps maybe only the first/main instance
> > should save settings. We could have a Tools->Save Config menu item
> > enabled for the first instance to allow the user to restart other
> > instances with the new set
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:54:31 +
Nick Treleaven wrote:
> > Makes the plugin much bigger and also requires more of the build
>
> Makes the core smaller ;-)
Probably not by much though.
> > functionality to be exposed unless everything is re-implemented in the
> &
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:43:33 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 25 February 2010 00:17, Nick Treleaven
> wrote:
>
> > Personally I'm not sure that tying the two implementations together is
> > a good idea. I haven't really studied Lex's build.c implementation bu
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:02:55 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> The overall issue of preferences, configuration and sessions for multiple
> instances is an interesting one (Sorry Eugene, I've got no answers but lots
> of questions)
>
> Why is the first necessarily the "master"?
> Is this by definition o
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:04:20 +0300
Eugene Arshinov wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> When several instances of Geany quit in the same time, there is a high
> possibility of a conflict. I can reproduce it easily on my machine,
> using either trunk or SM version.
>
> To reproduce: open three instances of gean
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:08:24 +
Nick Treleaven wrote:
> > I just implemented $subj. I can't be sure all decisions I made are
> > right, so I request a review. There are a couple of screen shots, for
> > those who don't like applying patches: [1], [2].
>
>
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 13:30:31 +
eh...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Replace tabs by spaces.
>
> Modified Paths:
> --
> trunk/ChangeLog
> trunk/plugins/genapi.py
Just wondered why? ;-)
Regards,
Nick
___
Geany-devel mailing list
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:03:01 +0100
Enrico Tröger wrote:
> >As I see it there area couple of ways of implementing your suggestion:
> >
> >1. a basic build system in the core and the advanced one in the
> >plugin, or
> >2. the two plugins approach
> >
> >1. has the advantage that the basic system i
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:34:03 +0300
Eugene Arshinov wrote:
> I just implemented $subj. I can't be sure all decisions I made are
> right, so I request a review. There are a couple of screen shots, for
> those who don't like applying patches: [1], [2].
Thanks ;-)
> In the first shot you can see I
401 - 500 of 667 matches
Mail list logo