Re: [Geany-devel] tagmanager changes
Am 09.05.2012 07:47, schrieb Lex Trotman: Using ctags, including locals in the tags generated from Geany source, slightly more than doubled the number of tags, and for some C++ I have around nearly four times the number. But you only need the tags for the current scope and can drop them if you enter another (non-nested) scope. This surely doesn't double or quadruple the tags. If I'm editing func A I don't want the locals of func B through Z in my autocompletion list. Best regards. ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
Re: [Geany-devel] tagmanager changes
On 9 May 2012 16:54, Thomas Martitz thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote: Am 09.05.2012 07:47, schrieb Lex Trotman: Using ctags, including locals in the tags generated from Geany source, slightly more than doubled the number of tags, and for some C++ I have around nearly four times the number. But you only need the tags for the current scope and can drop them if you enter another (non-nested) scope. This surely doesn't double or quadruple the tags. You can't drop them from the tags structures because when you are parsing you don't know which scope the cursor is in. So you have to add them all, then decide which ones apply to the current scope. If I'm editing func A I don't want the locals of func B through Z in my autocompletion list. Yes, correct, but they have to be in the tags first, then tagmanager has to be taught to choose the in-scope declaration, thats my point the parsers do not generate the information and tagmanager/symbols.c doesn't know how to use it Cheers Lex Best regards. ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
Re: [Geany-devel] tagmanager changes
Am 09.05.2012 09:37, schrieb Lex Trotman: On 9 May 2012 16:54, Thomas Martitz thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote: Am 09.05.2012 07:47, schrieb Lex Trotman: Using ctags, including locals in the tags generated from Geany source, slightly more than doubled the number of tags, and for some C++ I have around nearly four times the number. But you only need the tags for the current scope and can drop them if you enter another (non-nested) scope. This surely doesn't double or quadruple the tags. You can't drop them from the tags structures because when you are parsing you don't know which scope the cursor is in. So you have to add them all, then decide which ones apply to the current scope. Okay, but still only for the current file and not an entire project. Best regards. ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
Re: [Geany-devel] tagmanager changes
On 9 May 2012 17:40, Thomas Martitz thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote: Am 09.05.2012 09:37, schrieb Lex Trotman: On 9 May 2012 16:54, Thomas Martitz thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote: Am 09.05.2012 07:47, schrieb Lex Trotman: Using ctags, including locals in the tags generated from Geany source, slightly more than doubled the number of tags, and for some C++ I have around nearly four times the number. But you only need the tags for the current scope and can drop them if you enter another (non-nested) scope. This surely doesn't double or quadruple the tags. You can't drop them from the tags structures because when you are parsing you don't know which scope the cursor is in. So you have to add them all, then decide which ones apply to the current scope. Okay, but still only for the current file and not an entire project. Yes, Geany would only have the open files parsed, I only parsed the entire project to see how much the number of symbols increased if you go parse locals, by using all of Geany I got an average increase, note I only said two times not an absolute number :) Cheers Lex Best regards. ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
[Geany-devel] Geany Plugins Build using Waf fails from current Git master
Hey guys, building Geany Plugins from Git fails currently fails here. The output: http://pastebin.geany.org/kota1/ This doesn't actually mean this is an issue with Geany-Plugins, I'm running the current Fedora 17 Beta state here with updates-testing enabled. ;) I was hoping someone of you could point me in the right direction where to search for the cause anyway. :) Best Regards, Dominic -- Dominic Hopf http://dominichopf.de/ Key Fingerprint: A7DF C4FC 07AE 4DDC 5CA0 BD93 AAB0 6019 CA7D 868D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
Re: [Geany-devel] Geany Plugins Build using Waf fails from current Git master
On 09/05/2012 20:28, Dominic Hopf wrote: Hey guys, building Geany Plugins from Git fails currently fails here. The output: http://pastebin.geany.org/kota1/ This doesn't actually mean this is an issue with Geany-Plugins, I'm running the current Fedora 17 Beta state here with updates-testing enabled. ;) I was hoping someone of you could point me in the right direction where to search for the cause anyway. :) Best Regards, Dominic It’s a Vala related error, a name collision. I submitted a patch for this issue, see http://lists.uvena.de/geany-devel/2012-April/006759.html -- Quentin Sardem FF7 Glidic ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
Re: [Geany-devel] geany-plugins: Bleeding-edge compatibility
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:38:00 +0200 Quentin Glidic sardemff7+ge...@sardemff7.net wrote: On 19/04/2012 16:43, Matthew Brush wrote: An explanation would be useful. For MultiTerm, presumably it's to avoid a clash with GLib.Menu/MenuItem? Is GIO stuff part of the implicit namespace for GLib? Yes, and yes. If the answer to those is yes, it looks fine to apply as is. Even if the answer is no, the patch shouldn't harm anything besides cluttering up the code a little bit. Attached a new patch with a better commit message. With a view onto http://lists.uvena.de/pipermail/geany-devel/2012-May/006824.html Is this fine to append? Cheers, Frank -- http://frank.uvena.de/en/ pgpDJpMTMQyWZ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
Re: [Geany-devel] geany-plugins: Bleeding-edge compatibility
On 12-05-09 01:02 PM, Frank Lanitz wrote: On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:38:00 +0200 Quentin Glidicsardemff7+ge...@sardemff7.net wrote: On 19/04/2012 16:43, Matthew Brush wrote: An explanation would be useful. For MultiTerm, presumably it's to avoid a clash with GLib.Menu/MenuItem? Is GIO stuff part of the implicit namespace for GLib? Yes, and yes. If the answer to those is yes, it looks fine to apply as is. Even if the answer is no, the patch shouldn't harm anything besides cluttering up the code a little bit. Attached a new patch with a better commit message. With a view onto http://lists.uvena.de/pipermail/geany-devel/2012-May/006824.html Is this fine to append? Yeah it's fine. Thanks, Matthew Brush ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
