Re: [Geany-devel] (no subject)

Am 02.12.2011 01:20, schrieb Lex Trotman: > On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Meyer <3m.me...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Sure. I want to be able to select text, and then insert a character (e.g. >> an apostrophe) before and after the selection just by pressing the >> apostrophe key. Since the normal beh

Re: [Geany-devel] (no subject)

Am 01.12.2011 20:57, schrieb Meyer: > I have two possible situations that I need to differentiate between, and > I'm not sure how to do it - The first situation is the user deletes > selected text by overwriting it with a new character. The second is the > user deletes selected text by pressing ba

Re: [Geany-devel] ReST: Image size

Am 01.12.2011 18:42, schrieb Colomban Wendling: > Le 01/12/2011 18:21, Frank Lanitz a écrit : >> Am 01.12.2011 18:18, schrieb Colomban Wendling: >>> Le 01/12/2011 18:11, Frank Lanitz a écrit : >>>> Am 01.12.2011 18:01, schrieb Colomban Wendling: >>>>&

Re: [Geany-devel] ReST: Image size

Am 01.12.2011 18:18, schrieb Colomban Wendling: > Le 01/12/2011 18:11, Frank Lanitz a écrit : >> Am 01.12.2011 18:01, schrieb Colomban Wendling: >>> Le 01/12/2011 17:55, Frank Lanitz a écrit : >>>> Am 01.12.2011 17:25, schrieb Frank Lanitz: >>>>> Hi f

Re: [Geany-devel] ReST: Image size

Am 01.12.2011 18:11, schrieb Frank Lanitz: > Am 01.12.2011 18:01, schrieb Colomban Wendling: >> Le 01/12/2011 17:55, Frank Lanitz a écrit : >>> Am 01.12.2011 17:25, schrieb Frank Lanitz: >>>> Hi folks, >>>> >>>> Its a bit OT, but wondering wh

Re: [Geany-devel] ReST: Image size

Am 01.12.2011 18:01, schrieb Colomban Wendling: > Le 01/12/2011 17:55, Frank Lanitz a écrit : >> Am 01.12.2011 17:25, schrieb Frank Lanitz: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> Its a bit OT, but wondering whether somebody o you could help me: How >>> can I set sizes

Re: [Geany-devel] ReST: Image size

Am 01.12.2011 17:25, schrieb Frank Lanitz: > Hi folks, > > Its a bit OT, but wondering whether somebody o you could help me: How > can I set sizes for images inside ReST? E.g. I want to set it to 50% of > page width? Didn't found anything on documentation I found a way

[Geany-devel] ReST: Image size

Hi folks, Its a bit OT, but wondering whether somebody o you could help me: How can I set sizes for images inside ReST? E.g. I want to set it to 50% of page width? Didn't found anything on documentation Cheers, Frank signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___

Re: [Geany-devel] Unit tests for Geany (continued from Github)

Am 30.11.2011 10:24, schrieb Lex Trotman: > [...] >> >> I agree. Maybe we could add a section to HACKING file too as it would >> fit there IMHO. > > Since we have a long release cycle lots of non-C speaking people use > the Git version, so I think it needs to be where users can see it, not > just u

Re: [Geany-devel] Unit tests for Geany (continued from Github)

Am 30.11.2011 10:11, schrieb Matthew Brush: > On 11/30/2011 12:55 AM, Nathan Broadbent wrote: > >> I've figured out why the installation documentation didn't work for >> me: You pre-generate the 'configure' script and package this when you >> distribute a release in a tarball, but this configure s

Re: [Geany-devel] Unit tests for Geany (continued from Github)

Am 30.11.2011 08:39, schrieb Matthew Brush: > On 11/29/2011 11:12 PM, Frank Lanitz wrote: >> Am 30.11.2011 07:36, schrieb Nathan Broadbent: >>> P.S. The documentation needs to be updated for the 'waf' build system, >>> in quite a few places, including geany-

Re: [Geany-devel] Unit tests for Geany (continued from Github)

Am 30.11.2011 08:17, schrieb Matthew Brush: >> To be honest, the real reason that I started talking about unit tests, >> is because I really need them in order to write a lexer for scintilla. >> Manual testing for lexers would be a nightmare. >> > > That sounds much more approachable than doing it

Re: [Geany-devel] Unit tests for Geany (continued from Github)

Am 30.11.2011 07:36, schrieb Nathan Broadbent: > P.S. The documentation needs to be updated for the 'waf' build system, > in quite a few places, including geany-plugins. I don't refer to other points as I would need to catch up discussion on github before (wth why are we using differnt chanels? ca

Re: [Geany-devel] Some sort of thoughts about geany-plugins-devel-git-repo

Am 16.11.2011 07:12, schrieb Lex Trotman: > 1. Individual plugin maintainers shouldn't care about all the other > plugins in the combined release Not a written, but existing rule. > 2. Users getting the combined release to build should get everything > in one command ACK. > 3. The combined rele

Re: [Geany-devel] Some sort of thoughts about geany-plugins-devel-git-repo

Am 16.11.2011 12:02, schrieb Alexander Petukhov: > Maybe we can use git pre-commit hook to prevent commits that breaks some > quality criteria? > http://book.git-scm.com/5_git_hooks.html > To be honest I didn't get much into details but it seemed to me that it > can handle quality check tasks. Wel

Re: [Geany-devel] Some sort of thoughts about geany-plugins-devel-git-repo

Am 16.11.2011 22:50, schrieb Lex Trotman: [..] > I don't think your perception is wrong, but I think that keeping > plugins reasonably separate is also a good idea. As a user I can > choose the parts I want without the parts I don't need. So only > really tiny things should be combined like addon

[Geany-devel] Geanyprj-Crash (was: Re: Plugin : Geanyprj)

Am 23.11.2011 16:01, schrieb Johann SAUNIER: > 1) In a previous post, Lex told me that he couldn't create a new > project because of a crash : > > Unfortunately compiled against Geany Git it crashes creating a new > project. I don't have time (or interest I admit) to find out why, but >

Re: [Geany-devel] Plugin : Geanyprj

Am 24.11.2011 17:23, schrieb Johann SAUNIER: > Thanks a lot for your reactivity ! my answers and questions below : > > 2011/11/23 Frank Lanitz mailto:fr...@frank.uvena.de>> > > > > 2) I tried "./waf updatepo" and the results are big changes in .po >

Re: [Geany-devel] geany-plugins I18N

Am 25.11.2011 16:01, schrieb Johann SAUNIER: > Hello, > > Is it possible that someone who is granted to commit to geany-plugins to > run the command "./waf updatepo" on the plugins project ? > > I could run the command myself and join a patch for it on sourceforge, > but I guess that would be mor

[Geany-devel] README.waf-issue (was: Re: Plugin : Geanyprj)

Am 24.11.2011 17:23, schrieb Johann SAUNIER: > > 3) by executing step 2, I noticed an error in the README. waf. Do > I have > > to send a patch or just tell it to a maintainer on this list ? > > What's the issue you did found? There a bunch of ppl having access to > this file a

Re: [Geany-devel] Plugin : Geanyprj

Am 23.11.2011 16:01, schrieb Johann SAUNIER: > I tried to defend Geanyprj a few weeks ago because I heard it will be > removed from the plugins project due to a lack of maintenance. So, I > decided to maintain it myself because I would really miss it (I can't > get used to Gproject). > > First of

Re: [Geany-devel] Writing a plugin, not sure what to do with it

Am 18.11.2011 02:31, schrieb Matthew Brush: > On 11/17/2011 10:01 AM, Meyer wrote: >> I've never used a version control system before for my own code, but I >> think I it up correctly: https://github.com/pzoxiuv/Geany-Plugins >> > > Yep, I just cloned it and had a quick look. I left some comments

Re: [Geany-devel] Writing a plugin, not sure what to do with it

Am 17.11.2011 02:49, schrieb Meyer: > Thanks very much for the input! I've pasted an updated version here [1] > which should implement your suggestions (assuming I understand them > correctly). Didn't check the source code but maybe you can put it into some version control system. Maybe at githu

Re: [Geany-devel] Some sort of thoughts about geany-plugins-devel-git-repo

Am 16.11.2011 13:06, schrieb Thomas Martitz: > > I like this proposal. Requiring pull requests will also formally mean > "get your plugin in shape" before release. I'd like to extend this to > the point that if a plugin is not ready (due to bad code, inactive > maintainer, or otherwise) the snapsh

Re: [Geany-devel] Some sort of thoughts about geany-plugins-devel-git-repo

Am 16.11.2011 02:18, schrieb Matthew Brush: > > With some changes to the build system(s) it should be possible to make > each plugin buildable on its own or as part of the geany-plugins > project, as opposed to now, where it's difficult (impossible?) to have > your plugin build independently of th

[Geany-devel] Some sort of thoughts about geany-plugins-devel-git-repo

Hi developers, It has been a while when I first announced a mail about my idea of process after transition of geany-plugins repository. As from my understand the only open point is to have clarified the svn-url-reference question its a good point to tell you what I'm thinking of. Currently we do

Re: [Geany-devel] Maintainerrequest: Geany-Mini-Script

Am 08.10.2011 21:50, schrieb Eugene Arshinov: >> > Unfortunately I didn't heard back of developer of >> > geany-mini-script-plugin so today I like to ask you whether somebody >> > likes to take over maintenance for geany-mini-script plugin inside >> > geany-plugins-svn. It's untouched since maybe 2

Re: [Geany-devel] [RFC] Document Messages

Am 07.11.2011 08:30, schrieb Matthew Brush: > It's not currently implemented, but assuming it's not too tough to add a > (hidden?) preference, then it would be trivial to make this code do it. Would keep it deactivated in the first time to do some kind of only test. Cheers, Frank

Re: [Geany-devel] [RFC] Document Messages

Am 07.11.2011 02:12, schrieb Matthew Brush: > Hi all, > > I started working on something I'm calling "document messages" for lack > of a better name. Put another way, GtkInfoBar :) > > The changes add a new document function called `document_show_message()` > which will either show a GtkInfoBar

[Geany-devel] Newsletter: Issue 4 to be released soon

Hi folks, Again about two month passed by and a new issue of the newsletter is right on the way to get reach finish line. I'm targeting upcoming weekend or early next week for release. Well, if you like to add something, a couple of days are still left to send us your content for the newsletter.

Re: [Geany-devel] Geany Plugins testing repository

Am 30.10.2011 22:48, schrieb Jiří Techet: > Hi, > > I've created a repository for testing geany-plugins conversion from > svn to git here: > > https://github.com/techee/geany-plugins > > After consultation with Frank, it converts only the combined > geany-plugins repository, not the individual p

Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins 0.21.1 released

Am 01.11.2011 07:24, schrieb Frank Lanitz: > On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 21:34:32 +0100 > Dominic Hopf wrote: > >> Am Montag, den 31.10.2011, 12:09 +0100 schrieb Frank Lanitz: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Due a little issue with source tarball of 0.21-release of >&g

Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins 0.21.1 released

On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 21:34:32 +0100 Dominic Hopf wrote: > Am Montag, den 31.10.2011, 12:09 +0100 schrieb Frank Lanitz: > > Hi all, > > > > Due a little issue with source tarball of 0.21-release of > > Geany-Plugins 0.21.1 has been released which fixes an issue o

Re: [Geany-devel] GIT commit mails format

On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:44:52 + Nick Treleaven wrote: > On 31/10/2011 15:07, Nick Treleaven wrote: > > On 31/10/2011 13:57, Matthew Brush wrote: > > I'm not sure we would see a flood on a merge, probably only one > > commit saying 'merged gtkbuilder branch'? The gtkbuilder commits > >>

Re: [Geany-devel] Glade 3 Translations (was Re: Team Translation)

On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:01:02 +0200 Colomban Wendling wrote: > Le 18/10/2011 22:51, Matthew Brush a écrit : > > On 11-10-18 10:43 AM, Enrico Tröger wrote: > >> On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:58:35 +0200, Colomban wrote: > >> > >>> Le 16/10/2011 12:07, Matthew Brush a écrit : > Hi, > > Does

Re: [Geany-devel] GIT commit mails format

On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 06:29:36 -0700 Matthew Brush wrote: > On 11-10-31 05:00 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote: > > On 25/10/2011 00:33, Lex Trotman wrote: > >> [...] > >>> If we go back to individual commit mails with diffs, is there > >>> anyway to limit how many individual messages get sent out at once

Re: [Geany-devel] [RFC] Geany Plugin Names

On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:47:44 +0100 Colomban Wendling wrote: > Le 31/10/2011 08:37, Frank Lanitz a écrit : > > On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:20:23 +1100 > > Lex Trotman wrote: > > > >> [...] > >>>> Although in my, probably poorly informed, opinion, gproje

Re: [Geany-devel] Geany Hackfest

On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 02:08:54 -0700 Matthew Brush wrote: > Hi All, > > Just wanted to throw out the idea of a "hackfest" for Geany and/or > Geany Plugins. Obviously only a handful of us can get together in > meat space but between IRC, IM, the ML, and now GitHub, I think we > can manage without

[Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins 0.21.1 released

Hi all, Due a little issue with source tarball of 0.21-release of Geany-Plugins 0.21.1 has been released which fixes an issue of non working waf-build system from inside the source tarball. As usual, tarballs and their corresponding GPG signatures can be found at

Re: [Geany-devel] Geany Plugins Warnings (again)

On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 21:37:30 +1100 Lex Trotman wrote: > On 31 October 2011 21:30, Frank Lanitz wrote: > > On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 14:38:11 +1100 > > Lex Trotman wrote: > > > >> update checker - webkitdev > > > > I've updated the RADME for this, but

Re: [Geany-devel] fork me on github (again, and web stuff)

On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:15:25 -0500 Josh wrote: > Last time Matt noted I should've provided code to go with the > 'fork me on github' banners. So the following will get a 'fork me' > banner on geany.org (if that's desired; also, this scrolls w/the > page): IMHO we can put a github banner with

Re: [Geany-devel] Geany Plugins Warnings (again)

On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 14:38:11 +1100 Lex Trotman wrote: > update checker - webkitdev I've updated the RADME for this, but the only dependency should be libsoup. Not sure where webkit is coming from. Cheers, Frank -- http://frank.uvena.de/en/ pgph1BbduPJ57.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [Geany-devel] Future of GeanyGDB - [was: Geany Plugins Warnings (again)]

On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 16:01:22 +0100 Dominic Hopf wrote: > Am Freitag, den 28.10.2011, 16:46 -0700 schrieb Matthew Brush: > > > 1) > > > > > > There are guys out there who write C code and may use debugging > > > plugins from within Geany. There are at least two alternative > > > plugins which woul

Re: [Geany-devel] [RFC] Geany Plugin Names

On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 22:41:07 -0700 Matthew Brush wrote: > Anyway, just a thought to make things more consistent and less > redundant. It seems like while converting and moving to Git would be > an ideal time to do this. Feel free to +1, -1, comment or ignore. I don't have any strong opinion a

Re: [Geany-devel] [RFC] Geany Plugin Names

On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:20:23 +1100 Lex Trotman wrote: > [...] > >> Although in my, probably poorly informed, opinion, gproject seems > >> to encompass most of geanyprj > > > > Not completely. The main difference is that gproject is an extension > > of Geany's projects. As such, displays just sing

Re: [Geany-devel] Geany Plugins SVN Commit URLs

On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 02:15:33 -0700 Matthew Brush wrote: > Hi, > > I haven't heard too much about the Git conversion of Geany Plugins, > but I wanted to offer a suggestion that might improve the commit > messages compared to Geany's. In the Geany's Git repository there's > links back to the SVN

Re: [Geany-devel] Geany Plugins testing repository

On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 22:48:15 +0100 Jiří Techet wrote: > Hi, > > I've created a repository for testing geany-plugins conversion from > svn to git here: > > https://github.com/techee/geany-plugins > > After consultation with Frank, it converts only the combined > geany-plugins repository, not th

Re: [Geany-devel] [geany/geany] a23e99: Bump GTK+ version to 2.16

Am 28.10.2011 19:46, schrieb Matthew Brush: > > It would be great to get a little more testing on this, especially with > Waf and Windows. Compiling with waf and basic usage works fine on Xubuntu 11.10. Cheers, Frank ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-

Re: [Geany-devel] Geany Plugins Warnings (again)

Am 30.10.2011 02:52, schrieb Lex Trotman: > That of course is a better solution, but I assumed it was too hard > with autofools, WAF would of course just be print "I can't find ..." > in appropriate places. Its doing this. just as example from the machine I'm currently working on: $ ./waf configu

Re: [Geany-devel] Geany Plugins Warnings (again)

Am 29.10.2011 05:38, schrieb Lex Trotman: > Starting from a clean machine, I found many dependencies are > undocumented. Many plugins required the dev package as well as the > specified package, ok its sort of obvious, but it would be nice to > mention as well. > > Other than the dev packages, un

Re: [Geany-devel] Geany Plugins Warnings (again)

Am 29.10.2011 05:38, schrieb Lex Trotman: > Well done, I tested all but GeanyGDB and found some extra warnings, > see [1] probably as my checking is stricter than yours. "-Wall -Wextra > -O2 -no-unused-parameter" > > Plugin maintainers should look at these since they may indicate real > errors, eg

Re: [Geany-devel] A screenplay plugin for geany

On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 20:07:38 +0200 Liviu Andronic wrote: > On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Anil Gulecha > wrote: > > Commercial editors sell for 100s of dollars, when really a simple > > text editor will do. Infact this format has been used over the past > > century, and most scripts were written

Re: [Geany-devel] GIT commit mails format

On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:03:09 +0200 Colomban Wendling wrote: > > For example, the Xfce guys have a simple Shell script to do the job > > and it does it as I would wish: > > http://git.xfce.org/admin/xfce-git-hooks/tree/hooks/update-03-send-commit-mails > > > > An example mail: > > http://mail.xfc

[Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins Devs: Another Reminder

Hi Devs, Please remember to finish your updates for documentation etc. for your plugin(s) until Friday so the release can be done ;) Cheers, Frank -- http://frank.uvena.de/en/ pgpokA4aGig77.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Geany-devel mailing l

Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: Automake warning - Something bad?

On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:54:59 -0700 Matthew Brush wrote: > On 11-10-18 11:53 AM, Frank Lanitz wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:51:56 +0200 > > Frank Lanitz wrote: > > > >> Hi folks, > >> > >> I just tried autotools build for geany-plugins and rece

Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: Automake warning - Something bad?

On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:51:56 +0200 Frank Lanitz wrote: > Hi folks, > > I just tried autotools build for geany-plugins and received > geanypg/Makefile.am:1: ENABLE_GEANYCFP does not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL > Is this something we need to worry about? Another one on ru

[Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: Automake warning - Something bad?

Hi folks, I just tried autotools build for geany-plugins and received geanypg/Makefile.am:1: ENABLE_GEANYCFP does not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL Is this something we need to worry about? Cheers, Frank -- Frank Lanitz pgpLUkrg6QzcM.pgp Description: PGP signature

[Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: git@github

Hi folks, I've just created the geany-plugins repos on github inside our geany structure. I will *not* add any code until 0.21 has been released, but you might want to add it to your watchlist. You can find it at https://github.com/geany/geany-plugins *Please note*: All changes for 0.21 release

[Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: Postponing release of 0.21 for 1 week

Hi folks, We had a short discussion yesterday and we came to point we decided to move the release by one week to weekend around 2011-10-22. The reasons are simple: We are not done yet. There are still a few things pending (translations, documentation updates, NEWS-files) in combination with lag of

[Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: Reminder to update NEWS-file

Hi devs, This is a short reminder to update your NEWS file for near geany-plugins release 0.21. Cheers, Frank ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel

Re: [Geany-devel] GTK+ Version Bump to 2.18

Am 12.10.2011 16:04, schrieb Nick Treleaven: > So I would go for 2.16 overall if this brings us Glade 3 support. Also we have to think twice because of the Gtk/Windows item brought up earlier. (not sure atm what was the outcome) Cheers, Frank ___ Geany-

Re: [Geany-devel] [geany/geany] cc045b: Document building plugins for hacked Geany

Am 12.10.2011 15:35, schrieb Colomban Wendling: > Why is this in Geany's HACKING? AFAICT it only has to do with > Geany-Plugins build system, so I'd better see it in a Geany-Plugins > HACKING or something, but not in Geany's one. I agree. Cheers, Frank ___

[Geany-devel] ANN: Newsletter now on github too

Hi folks, I've just moved the repository for geany-newsletter also into our github project. Please check out https://github.com/geany/newsletter for getting a clone of it and/or let us now if you need write access too. You are very welcome! Cheers, Frank -- http://frank.uvena.de/en/ pgpKcgf

Re: [Geany-devel] Stop using SVN repository from now

On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 19:06:18 +0200 Jiří Techet wrote: > I'm just about to start the import from SVN into git so please stop > using SVN from now otherwise you'll have to re-apply your commits into > git afterwards. Good luck! Looking forward ;) Cheers, Fra

Re: [Geany-devel] Team Translation

On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 00:32:54 +0200 Enrico Tröger wrote: > On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 19:23:32 +0200, Frank wrote: > > >On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 08:28:04 -0700 > >Matthew Brush wrote: > > > >> - Translators (Pull/Push? or does it go through Frank?) > >> - on both geany and plugins repositories? > > > >

Re: [Geany-devel] Geany is on Github

On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 16:40:46 +0100 Nick Treleaven wrote: > > And now I have a question; now that Geany and Geany Plugins are > > grouped together under the same organization, should we drop the > > geany- prefix on the plugins repository? > > I would keep geany-plugins to show it's the g-p relea

[Geany-devel] Team Translation (was: Re: Geany is on Github)

On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 08:28:04 -0700 Matthew Brush wrote: > - Translators (Pull/Push? or does it go through Frank?) > - on both geany and plugins repositories? Its hard to say as the experience of translations providers differs much. Some of them never did use poedit or something before, ot

Re: [Geany-devel] Geany is on Github

On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 08:28:04 -0700 Matthew Brush wrote: > Another Team could be called "Translators", and have one of the three > levels of access control mentioned above, and it could be for all the > Geany repositories, since translators likely work on both Geany and > Geany-Plugins. Anothe

Re: [Geany-devel] Geany is on Github

On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 08:28:04 -0700 Matthew Brush wrote: > Just to start, because I had their Github usernames, I've added > Enrico and Colomban as owners, as well as myself since I need access > to set the stuff up. Whoever else should be an Owner (Frank, Nick, > etc.) just let me (or other Owne

Re: [Geany-devel] [Geany-i18n] ANN: String freeze for geany-plugins release 0.21

te-po to get an up2date catalog for your translations. Cheers, Frank Am 03.10.2011 16:49, schrieb Frank Lanitz: > Hi translators and friends of Geany-(Plugins), > > After Geany 0.21 has been released yesterday its time for a new release > of Geany-Plugins. > > We got a number of n

Re: [Geany-devel] geany-plugins: Bug in translation

Am 07.10.2011 11:57, schrieb Alexander Petukhov: > 07.10.2011 11:46, Frank Lanitz пишет: >> Am 07.10.2011 09:34, schrieb Alexander Petukhov: >> >>> yep, config.h i.e. #define GETTEXT_PACKAGE have to be placed before >>> #include >>> otherwise it doesn&

Re: [Geany-devel] geany-plugins: Bug in translation

Am 07.10.2011 09:34, schrieb Alexander Petukhov: > yep, config.h i.e. #define GETTEXT_PACKAGE have to be placed before > #include > otherwise it doesn't work. > I just wanted to say that some plugins do not even include config.h, at > least my one didn't :) Ah. OK. This lights up things a bit. We

Re: [Geany-devel] Git switch (for real)

Am 06.10.2011 23:01, schrieb Enrico Tröger: > On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 16:43:42 -0700, Matthew wrote: > >> On 11-10-05 04:23 PM, Colomban Wendling wrote: >>> Le 03/10/2011 23:02, Enrico Tröger a écrit : While I usually plead for free software I'd also vote for Github in this regard. In t

Re: [Geany-devel] geany on github; why not?

Am 06.10.2011 22:55, schrieb Colomban Wendling: > Le 06/10/2011 22:45, Enrico Tröger a écrit : >> On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 23:50:06 +0200, Colomban wrote: >> >>> Le 04/10/2011 23:37, Jiří Techet a écrit : Hi, I'm trying to get everything ready for the conversion and there are still a

Re: [Geany-devel] geany-plugins: Bug in translation

Am 06.10.2011 22:51, schrieb Enrico Tröger: > On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:44:58 +0400, Alexander wrote: > >> 06.10.2011 20:19, Frank Lanitz пишет: >>> On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 17:30:23 +0400 >>> Alexander Petukhov wrote: >>> >>> >>>> just wan

Re: [Geany-devel] geany-plugins: Bug in translation

geanyplugin.h. I guess I've fixed it for geany VC but needs some further investigation. Cheers, Frank -- Frank Lanitz pgpX20Rx8hFBb.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel

Re: [Geany-devel] Plugins README / web pages

Am 06.10.2011 13:49, schrieb Alexander Petukhov: > well, I uploaded a draft of a README to svn, I'd suggest to rename it with something like .sample or .template. Cheers, Frank ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi

Re: [Geany-devel] geany on github; why not?

Am 06.10.2011 11:01, schrieb Jiří Techet: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 01:02, Matthew Brush wrote: >> On 11-10-04 02:37 PM, Jiří Techet wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm trying to get everything ready for the conversion and there are >> >> >> Hi Jiri, >> >> I know it's a very small part of what you're do

Re: [Geany-devel] Plugins README / web pages

Am 05.10.2011 22:36, schrieb Matthew Brush: > I have no problem if you change the Devhelp one, though if we happen to > move to github, we might want to consider converting them to markdown. Just a short answer: No. ;) (Long answer: we discussed this maybe a 100 times before. There is no real adva

Re: [Geany-devel] geany-plugins: Bug in translation

Am 05.10.2011 15:07, schrieb Alexander Petukhov: > Latex insert special chars submenu is fine, > but the actual strings loading also happens in "geanylatex.c" in > "create_sub_menu" function, while in "letters.c" strings as glib docs say > are only "marked for translation" using "N_" macro, by the

Re: [Geany-devel] geany-plugins: Bug in translation

Am 05.10.2011 13:19, schrieb Alexander Petukhov: > with geanysendmail it's fine now, I checked recently, > but there is only one source file in it, so it follows the behaviour > I've described. GeanyLaTeX should be effected too by multiple files. -> insert special characters submenu. Cheers, Fran

Re: [Geany-devel] geany-plugins: Bug in translation

Am 05.10.2011 11:40, schrieb Alexander Petukhov: > It looks like it's a bug. > > I started to do russian translation today and noticed that some strings > do not appear translated whatever I do with them while others do. > Further investigation showed that the only translated strings are those > t

Re: [Geany-devel] geany on github; why not?

Am 04.10.2011 23:37, schrieb Jiří Techet: > Hi, > > I'm trying to get everything ready for the conversion and there are > still a few points unresolved: > >> I have a few comments (and questions) myself: >> >> 1. Some branch names should be renamed (e.g. Geany-0_19_1) because >> they have the sam

Re: [Geany-devel] Git switch (for real) (was: Re: geany on github; why not?)

On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 22:18:46 +0200 Jiří Techet wrote: > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 20:21, Frank Lanitz > wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 18:59:49 +0200 > > Jiří Techet wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 17:28, Colomban Wendling > >> wrote: > >

Re: [Geany-devel] Git switch (for real)

On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 18:29:25 +0200 Colomban Wendling wrote: > Le 03/10/2011 17:32, Frank Lanitz a écrit : > > On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:28:14 +0200 > > Colomban Wendling wrote: > > > >> Frank: when can we do the actual switch? I can have the time > >> wh

Re: [Geany-devel] Git switch (for real) (was: Re: geany on github; why not?)

On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 18:59:49 +0200 Jiří Techet wrote: > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 17:28, Colomban Wendling > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Now the release is out, it's time for the real migration.  There's > > things to do then, and perhaps a few we still need to agree on. > > > > > > Le 05/09/2011 23:

Re: [Geany-devel] Plan ahead (to fail to plan is to plan to fail)

On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 19:24:40 +0200 Jiří Techet wrote: > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 19:00, Frank Lanitz > wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 18:20:35 +0200 > > Jiří Techet wrote: > > > >> 1. The split between master and develop is completely unnecessary. > >>

Re: [Geany-devel] Plan ahead (to fail to plan is to plan to fail)

On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 19:27:16 +0200 Colomban Wendling wrote: > Le 03/10/2011 19:20, Frank Lanitz a écrit : > > On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 19:16:09 +0200 > > Jiří Techet wrote: > > > >>> > >>>> 2. I agree with non-fast-forward merges of feature branche

Re: [Geany-devel] Plan ahead (to fail to plan is to plan to fail)

On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 19:16:09 +0200 Jiří Techet wrote: > > > >> 2. I agree with non-fast-forward merges of feature branches. These > >> branches however have to be real feature branches where work > >> concentrates on implementing a single feature (e.g. GTK 3 support). > >> For instance I have a br

Re: [Geany-devel] Plan ahead (to fail to plan is to plan to fail)

On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 18:52:17 +0200 Colomban Wendling wrote: > > 2. I agree with non-fast-forward merges of feature branches. These > > branches however have to be real feature branches where work > > concentrates on implementing a single feature (e.g. GTK 3 support). > > For instance I have a bra

Re: [Geany-devel] Plan ahead (to fail to plan is to plan to fail)

On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 18:20:35 +0200 Jiří Techet wrote: > 1. The split between master and develop is completely unnecessary. I > don't see a reason why there should be a separate branch for releases > (i.e. commits with tags). The post says that a merge to master is a > release by definition. I pref

Re: [Geany-devel] Git switch (for real) (was: Re: geany on github; why not?)

On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:33:07 +0200 Dominic Hopf wrote: > Am Montag, den 03.10.2011, 17:28 +0200 schrieb Colomban Wendling: > > Apart that I don't mind, both have the necessary stuff, and > > Gitorious is more "free as in freedom". > > Exactly the reason why I'd personally prefer Gitorous over Gi

[Geany-devel] Github vs. Gitorious )was: Re: Git switch (for real) (was: Re: geany on github; why not?)

On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:28:14 +0200 Colomban Wendling wrote: > @all: We will switch to Git, and we need to choose basically between > GitHub and Gitorious. > I'd vote for trying GitHub, just because it has one thing I quite > liked and that Gitorious don't seem to have: comments on a particular >

Re: [Geany-devel] Git switch (for real) (was: Re: geany on github; why not?)

On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:28:14 +0200 Colomban Wendling wrote: > Frank: when can we do the actual switch? I can have the time > whenever I want this week, I just need to know ;) I suggest weekend around 2011-10-29. At least at this weekend I've nothing planned yet. But IIRC Enrico was on travel at

Re: [Geany-devel] Plan ahead (to fail to plan is to plan to fail)

On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 07:42:57 -0700 Matthew Brush wrote: > On 11-10-03 02:34 AM, Frank Lanitz wrote: > > > I think the changes you listed, which all make sense taking the > > general opinion of mailing list, but they are IMHO to big to put > > all in one release and m

[Geany-devel] ANN: String freeze for geany-plugins release 0.21

Hi translators and friends of Geany-(Plugins), After Geany 0.21 has been released yesterday its time for a new release of Geany-Plugins. We got a number of new plugins as well as huge number of new features on the one hand. On the other hand the plugins are not translated into many languages an

[Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: String freeze for 0.21

Hi devs, As you might were aware of and already did see I did the string freeze for Geany-Plugins 0.21. To ensure we have the best output I'd like to ask you to don't add new strings until release if not for a good reasons (e.g. typo, bug fix etc.) and take your time for checking documentation o

Re: [Geany-devel] Plan ahead (to fail to plan is to plan to fail)

On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 20:04:28 +1100 Lex Trotman wrote: > [...] > > In general I'm fine with this list as goals (discussing details > > would be the wrong place here), but would call it 0.9x with this > > changes on next release as changes are to big to become a 1.0 > > directly (to keep understandi

Re: [Geany-devel] Plan ahead (to fail to plan is to plan to fail)

On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 15:15:09 +1100 Lex Trotman wrote: > Hi All, > > Now we have 0.21 released I thought it was worthwhile looking at the > path ahead, and since we have the possibility of some quite > significant changes, maybe starting a plan of attack so that not too > much effort is wasted. >

[Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: A couple of compiler warnings

Hi folks, Sorry to be a pain in the ass but I'm still receiving a couple of compiler warnings when I'm compiling the geany-plugins at my AMD64 box. Can you please be so kind and have a look and double check, these warnings can be ignored or even better fixed? I will copy in the warnings I'm rece

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >