LOL! Sorry, way off topic, but I'm an addictions counselor and couldn't resist
the HIPAA notice... me too Doc.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: [geeklog-users] includin
Thanks. That did the trick.
Norm
On Monday, June 16, 2003, at 09:45 AM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Backslash the backslashes :*)
Yes, Geeklog has a problem with backslashes (also with ampersands) in
articles and blocks. When creating items that have such characters in
them, I keep an off-li
Thanks. I'll give that a try.
Sorry about the sig...I'm a physician and to comply with the new
regulations known as HIPAA, I need to include such a statement when
sending patient information. Forgot to strip it from my post. In this
case, better to err on the side of caution ;->
Norm
On Mond
On Monday, June 16, 2003, at 08:33 AM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, but I've found another problem. Geeklog is stripping slashes
from the javascript code in this section:
When viewing the source, after loading the javascript, all the
backslashes which are escaping the special characters ar
Thanks, but I've found another problem. Geeklog is stripping slashes
from the javascript code in this section:
i=0; document.write("\");
while( t[i] ) document.write("\&\#"+t[i++]+";");
i++; document.write("\<\/a\>");
When viewing the source, after loading the javascript, all the
backslashes w
Norm wrote:
>I just tried it in a normal block and got
>nothing. I then viewed the html source and noted that were put
>after each line of the javascript...
Since Geeklog doesn't know whether the block contains HTML or plain text,
it looks at the very first character of the block content. If i
Thanks for responding. I just tried it in a normal block and got
nothing. I then viewed the html source and noted that were put
after each line of the javascript...presumably leading to problems with
the javascript interpreter appropriately identifying the code. Any
other ideas?
Thanks,
Nor
tails several major revamps for them to reach their 1.0 goal.
John
-
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 10:13:06 +0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [geeklog-users] including javascript in blocks
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Geeklog-ers,
Yesterday someone
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: [geeklog-users] including javascript in blocks
> Dear Geeklog-ers,
>
> Yesterday someone posted this article on http://news.schoolforge.net (aka
> opensourceschools.org) claiming, without substantiation, that post nuke
was
> supe
Dear Geeklog-ers,
Yesterday someone posted this article on http://news.schoolforge.net (aka
opensourceschools.org) claiming, without substantiation, that post nuke was
superior. If you have a moment to lend a critical eye to the exact claims and
respond, I'd be grateful:
http://opensourceschools.
10 matches
Mail list logo
