On Wednesday 26 August 2009 14:24:04 Arnd wrote:
> Omari Stephens [08/26/2009 08:07 AM]
>
> > Arnd, were you running something >=r1799?
>
> No, the beta2 release from July 2nd.
>
> I tried the same test as before (1.2), and it is indeed faster, from
> 10.7s (confirmed with the old beta2) down to 9.
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 12:46:28 Arnd wrote:
> Vladimir Nadvornik [08/26/2009 10:55 AM]
>
> > Just a note that geeqie flushes the draw queue every 50ms, that means
> > 20 updates if the loading takes 1s and 200 updates if it takes 10s.
> > 20 updates where each update draws 1/20 of the image ar
Omari Stephens [08/26/2009 08:07 AM]
> Arnd, were you running something >=r1799?
No, the beta2 release from July 2nd.
I tried the same test as before (1.2), and it is indeed faster, from
10.7s (confirmed with the old beta2) down to 9.5s (svn-rev1824). Still
slower than the others, but on the r
Sabin Iacob [08/26/2009 01:00 AM]
> test images, config and scripts, please :P (I am willing to try it on my
> mighty Atom EeePC).
Images & configs here:
http://rapidshare.com/files/271693521/geeqiespeedtest.tar
I didn't use a script, I just launched "time "
6 times, and took the average of th
Vladimir Nadvornik [08/26/2009 10:55 AM]
> Just a note that geeqie flushes the draw queue every 50ms, that means
> 20 updates if the loading takes 1s and 200 updates if it takes 10s.
> 20 updates where each update draws 1/20 of the image area is faster than
> 200 updates by 1/200 of the area.
>
>
Hi Arnd,
Thanks for the testing.
On út 25. srpna 2009, Arnd wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thank you for continuing development of Geeqie. I am a long time GQview
> user. I use some other viewers as well.
>
> Here are some speed comparisons which might be interesting. I've done
> them on an old P3-600 single C
Vladimir Nadvornik wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 August 2009 20:33:14 Omari Stephens wrote:
>> [NOTE: I just realized that my tree is patched with the multi-threaded
>> thumbnail loaders patch. I'm not sure what this may have changed.]
>>
>> So, the vast majority of the time is spent in:
>> static void v
Sabin Iacob wrote:
::snip? SNIP!::
> P.S. is it me, or do Nikon NEF files really render faster than JPEGs? :-/
They should render as fast as JPEGs of the same quality. What you see is
actually an embedded (iirc) ~75% quality JPEG preview that lives in every NEF.
It's not actually processing the
Arnd wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thank you for continuing development of Geeqie. I am a long time GQview
> user. I use some other viewers as well.
>
> Here are some speed comparisons which might be interesting. I've done
> them on an old P3-600 single CPU computer, which demonstrates the
> differences (abs
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 20:33:14 Omari Stephens wrote:
> [NOTE: I just realized that my tree is patched with the multi-threaded
> thumbnail loaders patch. I'm not sure what this may have changed.]
>
> So, the vast majority of the time is spent in:
> static void vflist_name_cell_data_cb(...)
> wh
[NOTE: I just realized that my tree is patched with the multi-threaded thumbnail
loaders patch. I'm not sure what this may have changed.]
So, the vast majority of the time is spent in:
static void vflist_name_cell_data_cb(...)
which lives around line 1771 of view_file_list.c
The backtrace gene
Klaus Ethgen a écrit :
> Hi,
>
Hi Klaus,
> Am Di den 25. Aug 2009 um 16:18 schrieb Laurent Monin:
> > Thanks for the numbers !
>
> Yea, thanks. It shows in numbers what I just felt.
>
> > It would be interesting to have such numbers for recent hardware too (n
> > CPUs/more RAM).
>
> I think it woul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
Am Di den 25. Aug 2009 um 16:18 schrieb Laurent Monin:
> Thanks for the numbers !
Yea, thanks. It shows in numbers what I just felt.
> It would be interesting to have such numbers for recent hardware too (n
> CPUs/more RAM).
I think it would
Arnd a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> Thank you for continuing development of Geeqie. I am a long time GQview
> user. I use some other viewers as well.
>
> Here are some speed comparisons which might be interesting. I've done
> them on an old P3-600 single CPU computer, which demonstrates the
> differences (
Hi!
Thank you for continuing development of Geeqie. I am a long time GQview
user. I use some other viewers as well.
Here are some speed comparisons which might be interesting. I've done
them on an old P3-600 single CPU computer, which demonstrates the
differences (absolute values are not signi
15 matches
Mail list logo
