[Gegl-developer] [Fwd: GSoC 2008 - announcing GIMP projects] & GEGL projects

2008-04-21 Thread Michael Schumacher
Original Message Subject: GSoC 2008 - announcing GIMP projects Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:51:47 +0200 From: Michael Schumacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: GIMP Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: GIMP Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GIMP User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi, Google has

Re: [Gegl-developer] Scanline processing in a GeglOperation

2008-04-21 Thread Øyvind Kolås
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Hans Petter Jansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 16:43 +0100, Øyvind Kolås wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Øyvind Kolås <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Thus to correctly implement floyd steinberg you would actually have to >

Re: [Gegl-developer] Scanline processing in a GeglOperation

2008-04-21 Thread Hans Petter Jansson
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 16:43 +0100, Øyvind Kolås wrote: > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Øyvind Kolås <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thus to correctly implement floyd steinberg you would actually have to > > request the processing of the entire image and not piece by piece thus > > losing the

Re: [Gegl-developer] Scanline processing in a GeglOperation

2008-04-21 Thread Hans Petter Jansson
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 11:18 +0100, Øyvind Kolås wrote: > The floyd steinberg type of error diffusion is going a bit contrary to > the way GEGL is designed, since effectivly to bottomright most pixel > depends on the contents of the entire image. Thus if the upper left > pixel in the image changes

Re: [Gegl-developer] Scanline processing in a GeglOperation

2008-04-21 Thread Øyvind Kolås
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Øyvind Kolås <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thus to correctly implement floyd steinberg you would actually have to > request the processing of the entire image and not piece by piece thus > losing the ability to handle larger than RAM images. This isn't entirely

Re: [Gegl-developer] compile failed with GCC<4.0

2008-04-21 Thread Øyvind Kolås
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:58 PM, lode leroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (sorry, my previous mail was too fast...) Please svn up, should work in svn trunk now, I've changed the USE_GCC_VECTORS define to be possible to check with both #if and #ifdef. (I think this should work at least) /Øyvind K.

Re: [Gegl-developer] compile failed with GCC<4.0

2008-04-21 Thread Martin Nordholts
lode leroy wrote: > (sorry, my previous mail was too fast...) > > I have had to apply the following correction: > > What is the compilation error message? - Martin ___ Gegl-developer mailing list Gegl-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.

Re: [Gegl-developer] compile failed with GCC<4.0

2008-04-21 Thread lode leroy
(sorry, my previous mail was too fast...) I have had to apply the following correction: Index: operations/common/brightness-contrast.c === --- operations/common/brightness-contrast.c (revision 2210) +++ operations/common/brightn

[Gegl-developer] compile failed with GCC<4.0

2008-04-21 Thread lode leroy
I have had to apply the following correction: Index: operations/common/brightness-contrast.c === --- operations/common/brightness-contrast.c (revision 2210) +++ operations/common/brightness-contrast.c (working copy) @@ -108,7

Re: [Gegl-developer] Scanline processing in a GeglOperation

2008-04-21 Thread Øyvind Kolås
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 7:41 AM, Hans Petter Jansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Sorry if this gets posted twice; I managed to send the first one with > the wrong From: address]. > > Hi. I've looked through the docs and (briefly) the list archives, but I > can't figure out if it's possible to