On 06/25/2009 10:50 PM, Adam Turcotte wrote:
My question at the moment is: what is the best way to pass this data
to the sampler?
I feel bad about you not getting a reply, so I want to give a reply even
though it's not a super helpful one:
Use whatever way you can come up with and that
Martin Nordhotls wrote:
Personally I don't see the point in duplicating a matrix lib in
every software, i.e. I question the introduction of GeglMatrix3 in
the first place, I mean there certainly must be high quality libs
for matrix operations out there, but that's a different story...
IMHO,
On 06/29/2009 09:53 PM, Nicolas Robidoux wrote:
IMHO, when all you are dealing with are 3x3 matrices (which are not
arbitrary 3x3, since they represent affine + perspective
transformations), it is likely that a general purpose matrix library
would be slower. Even more so with 2x2.
So, my
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Martin Nordholtsense...@gmail.com wrote:
Since GeglMatrix3 exists, GeglMatrix2 also should exist for consistency.
Should GeglMatrix2 also reside within gegl-matrix.c, or should it be
separate? I can quickly create GeglMatrix2 for the purposes of passing
Jacobian
4 matches
Mail list logo