Re: [Gegl-developer] babl docs

2010-10-01 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 09/30/2010 11:11 AM, Sven Neumann wrote: On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 07:36 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote: GIMP tends to claim C89 compatibility; we shouldnt assume more modern language standard than GIMP does. Hi Øyvind What problems do you expect us to get if we begin to rely on an 11 year

Re: [Gegl-developer] babl docs

2010-10-01 Thread Rupert Weber
On 10/01/2010 08:20 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote: * mixed declarations and code Because variables can be declared closer to where they are used If only I hadn't brought up the topic... ;) I think that's a terrible concept which actually makes code very difficult to read. Instead of

Re: [Gegl-developer] babl docs

2010-10-01 Thread Rupert Weber
On 09/29/2010 06:08 PM, Rupert Weber wrote: On 09/15/2010 05:11 PM, Rupert Weber wrote: I just found out the hard way what model-to-model conversions are about: 1. They can only be from/to RGBA (that part was easy) 2. For every new model, model-to-model conversions *must* be supplied. Those

Re: [Gegl-developer] babl docs

2010-10-01 Thread Sven Neumann
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 08:20 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote: What specific C99 features are we talking about at all? Is there a specific feature that you guys would like to use? I like in particular * designated initializers Nice to have Indeed. * // comments Using /*