-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/28/2011 03:05 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Ah, I see. Are there any runtime tests for the Pd version in Gem?
how it that supposed to help?
I'm perfectly happy if you want to use verbose() instead of logpost().
I didn't use it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/28/2011 07:19 PM, Antoine Villeret wrote:
hi,
did you finally found a way to output more than one pix image from a pix
object ?
i'm interessed in it too and also on adding severals pix_image input
there shouldn't be any problem
Hello,
I made a patch on my laptop with Pd 0.42.6 and Gem 0.93.SVN rev4516. It
is working fine on this configuration.
I send it to a friend which one is on the same Ubuntu (but maybe a
different Pd and Gem, i think it is pd-ext 0.42.5).
The patch use two [pix_video], one [pix_film] with a
On Sep 29, 2011, at 2:59 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/28/2011 03:05 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Ah, I see. Are there any runtime tests for the Pd version in Gem?
how it that supposed to help?
I'm perfectly happy if you want to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-09-29 17:05, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
so you are saying that there is a loglevel between post() and
verbose(0)? how come?
Because that's the way it is, and that the way that you insisted it be
against Miller and my objections.
On Sep 29, 2011, at 11:23 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-09-29 17:05, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
so you are saying that there is a loglevel between post() and
verbose(0)? how come?
Because that's the way it is, and that the way
