Bump.
I was finally able to update to a more recent version of gem5, and I
immediately ran into this problem when trying to run a simple test with x86
O3CPU and Ruby. Here's the assertion failure again:
gem5.opt: build/X86/mem/ruby/system/RubyPort.hh:190: void
RubyPort::addToRetryList(RubyPort:
> On Feb. 10, 2015, 9:37 a.m., Stephan Diestelhorst wrote:
> > I have had a similar impulse, when inspecting this code. However, the
> > prefetch hitting a write-back in an upper cache is actually already handled
> > in Cache::getTimingPacket():
> >
> > // Check if the prefetch hi
> On Feb. 10, 2015, 9:37 a.m., Stephan Diestelhorst wrote:
> > I have had a similar impulse, when inspecting this code. However, the
> > prefetch hitting a write-back in an upper cache is actually already handled
> > in Cache::getTimingPacket():
> >
> > // Check if the prefetch hi
Hey Gabe and Nilay,
Have either of you had a chance to look into this more deeply?
I'm running into what appears to be the same problem: The CPU core pulls
the interrupt from the interrupts device (by calling getInterrupt() and
then updateIntrInfo()). Then, while fetching/decoding the first
in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2647/
---
(Updated Feb. 10, 2015, 5:43 p.m.)
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2636/#review5885
---
I have had a similar impulse, when inspecting this code. However, the pr
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2627/
---
(Updated Feb. 10, 2015, 4:02 p.m.)
Review request for Default.
Changes
---
D
Hey Brad,
It may not solve the multi-cache block problem, but it does get us closer
to a working backing store ;).
Do you see a simple change to this patch to get multi-cache block DMA
working? I don't have a program to test this with, so I'm not sure if I'm
the right person to do it. Does it mak
Hi all,
To me it sounds like the whole ruby philosophy of “two, or even three
views of the same data” might need an overhaul.
Andreas
On 10/02/2015 04:44, "Beckmann, Brad via gem5-dev"
wrote:
>Thanks Jason. I didn't notice your patch until after I sent out my
>email. It looks like we are enc
* build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/linux/minor-timing passed.
* build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/linux/o3-timing passed.
* build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/linux/simple-atomic passed.
* build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/linux/simple
10 matches
Mail list logo
