Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3192: ruby: split CPU and GPU latency stats

> On Nov. 12, 2015, 8:08 p.m., Joel Hestness wrote: > > src/mem/slicc/symbols/StateMachine.py, line 313 > > > > > > Not sure if this should be fixed before commit, but I feel it should be > > fixed at some point: > >

[gem5-dev] Cron <m5test@zizzer> /z/m5/regression/do-regression quick

* build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/linux/minor-timing passed. * build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/linux/simple-atomic passed. * build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/linux/o3-timing passed. *

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3226: arm: Add support for automatic boot loader selection

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3226/ --- (Updated Nov. 18, 2015, 12:08 p.m.) Review request for Default. Repository: gem5

[gem5-dev] Review Request 3226: arm: Add support for automatic boot loader selection

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3226/ --- Review request for Default. Repository: gem5 Description --- Changeset

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3178: ruby: cleaner ruby tester support

> On Nov. 2, 2015, 5:18 p.m., Jason Lowe-Power wrote: > > configs/ruby/MESI_Three_Level.py, line 104 > > > > > > I hate to be picky, but could you use this code instead: > > > > if len(system.cpu) == 1: > >

[gem5-dev] Style Checker: Includes Order Warning

Hello, When working with mq patches in the gem5 repo, I get a lot of warnings about the order of includes being wrong. Although they follow the guidelines set in the style guide, it seems that the script is looking for something different. When directing the script to fix them, it will put the