Sounds like a great idea to me. I fail to see any downside.
--
Dr. Bobby R. Bruce
Room 2235,
Kemper Hall, UC Davis
Davis,
CA, 95616
web: https://www.bobbybruce.net
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:03 PM Gabe Black wrote:
> Hi folks. I (and probably many of you) have noticed that gerrit sometimes
>
Hi folks. I (and probably many of you) have noticed that gerrit sometimes
decides something needs to be rebased when it doesn't really seem to, and
that rebase ends up forcing a rerun of verification which delays getting a
patch checked in, and incurs extra cost for gem5 for the compute resources
Hi Jason, replies inline.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:29 PM Jason Lowe-Power
wrote:
> Oh, one more comment...
>
> Do you think it's worth changing the name to "gem5" instead of "m5". Since
> we're making big changes, it seems like now might be right time.
>
That's not a bad idea, although there
Gabe Black has submitted this change. (
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/27205 )
Change subject: util: Remove the subfunc arg from M5OP_FOREACH.
..
util: Remove the subfunc arg from M5OP_FOREACH.
Now that
Gabe Black has submitted this change. (
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/27204 )
Change subject: misc: Remove the now unused M5OP_FOREACH_ANNOTATION macro.
..
misc: Remove the now unused
Oh, one more comment...
Do you think it's worth changing the name to "gem5" instead of "m5". Since
we're making big changes, it seems like now might be right time.
Cheers,
Jason
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:10 PM Jason Lowe-Power
wrote:
> Hey Gabe,
>
> First of all, thanks for this cleanup.
Hey Gabe,
First of all, thanks for this cleanup. We've needed to update this code for
a long time!
Do you have a pointer to what would be "new" documentation on the m5 ops
tools? I was briefly going through your changes and it's not clear how
you're envisioning people using this library now. For
Yes,
We're using this migration to slowly drop support for GCC 4 (
https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-218), which i believe is causing
these discrepencies. GCB runs on a Docker Image built with
Thanks Jason for the great effort you are putting on this, and for updating us
on the current state.
It’s not really relevant to our discussion, but while GCB and kokoro run the
same tests, they do that under different building environments.
An example is:
A couple of things... Bobby can correct me if I'm wrong.
1. GCB and kokoro should be running *the same tests*. So they should always
have the same result. There's no need to wait for kokoro if you have a +1
from GCB.
2. The migration is still in progress. There are a couple of loose ends we
need
Yes, I am logged in.
From: Giacomo Travaglini
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 3:29 PM
To: Nils Asmussen ; gem5 Developer List
; Ciro Santilli ; Jason Lowe-Power
; Bobby Bruce
Subject: RE: [gem5-dev] Removing kokoro runs
Have you tried to login?
Giacomo
Have you tried to login?
Giacomo
-Original Message-
From: Nils Asmussen
Sent: 31 March 2020 15:27
To: gem5 Developer List ; Ciro Santilli
; Jason Lowe-Power ; Bobby Bruce
; Giacomo Travaglini
Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] Removing kokoro runs
Hi,
same for me. Google says the permission
Hi,
same for me. Google says the permission "cloudbuild.builds.get" is missing.
Best regards,
Nils
On 3/31/20 4:23 PM, Ciro Santilli wrote:
> Since Giacomo started this thread, I would also want to chime in a related
> question: are you able to see GCB run logs?
>
> E.g. at:
Since Giacomo started this thread, I would also want to chime in a related
question: are you able to see GCB run logs?
E.g. at: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/27315 GCB links
to
Giacomo Travaglini has submitted this change. (
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/26810 )
Change subject: arch-arm, dev-arm: WakeRequest implementation
..
arch-arm, dev-arm: WakeRequest implementation
This
Gabe Black has submitted this change. (
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/27203 )
Change subject: util: Remove the annotation pseudo ops symbols from the m5
utility.
..
util: Remove the annotation pseudo
Hi,
I have noticed we have started using the Google Cloud service to run our
pre-submit regressions.
At the moment this is happening in parallel with kokoro.
Few things to point out:
1. It is actually possible now to submit a patch without kokoro. GCB is
faster than kokoro and starts as
Ciro Santilli has uploaded this change for review. (
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/27310 )
Change subject: tests: move threads test to the new framework
..
tests: move threads test to the new framework
Ciro Santilli has uploaded this change for review. (
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/27315 )
Change subject: tests: remove hello, already present in new framework
..
tests: remove hello, already present
Ciro Santilli has uploaded this change for review. (
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/27314 )
Change subject: tests: move page-access-wrap test to the new framework
..
tests: move page-access-wrap test to
Ciro Santilli has uploaded this change for review. (
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/27307 )
Change subject: tests: move m5op_arm_A64.S to m5op_arm64.S
..
tests: move m5op_arm_A64.S to m5op_arm64.S
This
Ciro Santilli has uploaded this change for review. (
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/27312 )
Change subject: tests: move mwait test to the new framework
..
tests: move mwait test to the new framework
Ciro Santilli has uploaded this change for review. (
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/27309 )
Change subject: tests: move pthread tests to the new framework
..
tests: move pthread tests to the new
Ciro Santilli has uploaded this change for review. (
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/27313 )
Change subject: tests: move chdir-print test to the new framework
..
tests: move chdir-print test to the new
Ciro Santilli has uploaded this change for review. (
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/27311 )
Change subject: tests: move stack-print test to the new framework
..
tests: move stack-print test to the new
Ciro Santilli has uploaded this change for review. (
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/27308 )
Change subject: tests: generic Makefile for user and baremetal test programs
..
tests: generic Makefile for
26 matches
Mail list logo
