Yep, I agree. While the new thing can be inspired by the ChunkGenerator,
unless it shares a significant chunk of implementation (not likely, there
isn't a ton of code in ChunkGenerator), they don't have to actually be
related to each other. I think particularly since in cases like the TLB
example,
Thanks for the effort, Gabe!
I totally agree that making the interface support range-based for loops
makes sense. That would be a nice improvement.
Having TLBs (or page tables?) support some kind of variable-size chunk loop
range object that deals with multiple page sizes, maybe automatically
