On July 23, 2012, 11:12 a.m., Marc Orr wrote:
src/sim/syscall_emul.hh, line 601
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1318/diff/1/?file=28137#file28137line601
Why is this fatal being changed to a warn? I'm not necessarily against
this, but I thought a lot of the effort and controversy
On July 23, 2012, 11:12 a.m., Marc Orr wrote:
src/sim/syscall_emul.hh, line 601
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1318/diff/1/?file=28137#file28137line601
Why is this fatal being changed to a warn? I'm not necessarily against
this, but I thought a lot of the effort and controversy
On July 23, 2012, 11:12 a.m., Marc Orr wrote:
src/sim/syscall_emul.hh, line 601
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1318/diff/1/?file=28137#file28137line601
Why is this fatal being changed to a warn? I'm not necessarily against
this, but I thought a lot of the effort and controversy
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1318/#review3186
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Marc Orr
On July 22, 2012, 5:29 p.m., Steve
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1318/#review3133
---
src/sim/syscall_emul.hh
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1318/#comment3289
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1318/
---
Review request for Default.
Description
---
[Note: this is an updated version
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1318/#review3130
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Ali Saidi
On July 22, 2012, 5:29 p.m., Steve
