On Aug. 20, 2014, 5:39 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote:
While I am ok with the changes made, do you think it is possible to
retain the Enum instead of using 12, 14 and 16?
I think this should be fine. I'll update patch shortly.
- Curtis
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2327/
---
(Updated Aug. 26, 2014, 9:04 p.m.)
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2327/#review5285
---
While I am ok with the changes made, do you think it is possible to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2327/
---
(Updated Aug. 18, 2014, 9:55 p.m.)
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2327/#review5257
---
src/arch/arm/table_walker.hh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2327/
---
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
Description
---
Changeset
