On Nov. 29, 2014, 8:04 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
The changes to getPtr() look good to me.
On the broader topic of zero-sized prefetches, I'm a little confused... I
can see a CPU or CPU-like object (i.e., a tester) generate a zero-size
prefetch as a touch operation, but then it
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2490/#review5568
---
Ship it!
The changes to getPtr() look good to me.
On the broader topic
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2490/
---
(Updated Nov. 24, 2014, 12:18 p.m.)
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2490/#review5469
---
Overall I am fine with the patch. Can we set the size to 1 when the
On Nov. 18, 2014, 3:44 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote:
Overall I am fine with the patch. Can we set the size to 1 when the
prefetch request
is being created? I don't see any harm in that.
It might incur stats changes...that's my main reason for not changing anything.
Perhaps it's worth
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2490/
---
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
Description
---
Changeset
