Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3357: ruby: Rename pkt to m_pkt so it may be accessed via SLICC

2016-03-21 Thread Jason Lowe-Power
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3357/#review8106 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Jason Lowe-Power On March 4, 2016, 7:52 p.m.,

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3357: ruby: Rename pkt to m_pkt so it may be accessed via SLICC

2016-03-19 Thread Brandon Potter
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3357/#review8094 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Brandon Potter On March 4, 2016, 7:52 p.m.,

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3357: ruby: Rename pkt to m_pkt so it may be accessed via SLICC

2016-03-04 Thread Matthew Poremba
> On March 4, 2016, 6:26 p.m., Jason Lowe-Power wrote: > > Could you add some details to the commit message about why you need to > > access pkt from slicc? Sure, i've updated the patch description. - Matthew --- This is an

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3357: ruby: Rename pkt to m_pkt so it may be accessed via SLICC

2016-03-04 Thread Matthew Poremba
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3357/ --- (Updated March 4, 2016, 7:52 p.m.) Review request for Default. Changes ---

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3357: ruby: Rename pkt to m_pkt so it may be accessed via SLICC

2016-03-04 Thread Jason Lowe-Power
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3357/#review8058 --- Could you add some details to the commit message about why you need to

[gem5-dev] Review Request 3357: ruby: Rename pkt to m_pkt so it may be accessed via SLICC

2016-03-04 Thread Matthew Poremba
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3357/ --- Review request for Default. Repository: gem5 Description --- Changeset