[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: config: KVM acceleration for apu_se.py

changeset d726d0cea027 in /z/repo/gem5 details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=d726d0cea027 description: config: KVM acceleration for apu_se.py Add support for using KVM to accelerate APU simulations. The intended use case is to fast-forward through runtime

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: cpu, mem, sim: Change how KVM maps memory

changeset 29606f000389 in /z/repo/gem5 details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=29606f000389 description: cpu, mem, sim: Change how KVM maps memory Only map memories into the KVM guest address space that are marked as usable by KVM. Create BackingStoreEntry

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: tests: Add example of using KVM acceleration ...

changeset ceece50bbf08 in /z/repo/gem5 details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=ceece50bbf08 description: tests: Add example of using KVM acceleration with an app Add #ifdef's to gpu-hello.cpp demonstrating how to annotate an application for KVM acceleration.

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3599: mem: Sort memory commands and update DRAMPower

> On Aug. 16, 2016, 3:20 p.m., Jason Lowe-Power wrote: > > src/mem/dram_ctrl.hh, line 340 > > > > > > Since you want this to be sorted, would it make more sense to use a > > sorted list (e.g., priority_queue)? > > Wendy

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3599: mem: Sort memory commands and update DRAMPower

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3599/#review8674 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Jason Lowe-Power On Aug. 11, 2016, 9:07 a.m.,

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3599: mem: Sort memory commands and update DRAMPower

> On Aug. 16, 2016, 3:20 p.m., Jason Lowe-Power wrote: > > src/mem/dram_ctrl.hh, line 340 > > > > > > Since you want this to be sorted, would it make more sense to use a > > sorted list (e.g., priority_queue)? Sorting is

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3619: kvm: Support timing accesses for KVM cpu

> On Aug. 21, 2016, 3:29 a.m., Michael LeBeane wrote: > > Well, having played around with this solution for KVM MMIO + Ruby a bit it > > does work (with the addition of a timing_noncacheable state as Andreas S. > > noted), but not very well. If you put the system in timing mode you get > >

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3619: kvm: Support timing accesses for KVM cpu

> On Aug. 21, 2016, 4:29 a.m., Michael LeBeane wrote: > > Well, having played around with this solution for KVM MMIO + Ruby a bit it > > does work (with the addition of a timing_noncacheable state as Andreas S. > > noted), but not very well. If you put the system in timing mode you get > >

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3619: kvm: Support timing accesses for KVM cpu

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3619/#review8669 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Andreas Sandberg On Aug. 21, 2016, 4:19 a.m.,

Re: [gem5-dev] Fault handling issue

On 19 Aug 2016, at 17:45, Rodolfo Guilherme Wottrich wrote: Hi Rodolfo, how did you solve this (code wise). I am trying to hunt down an undelivered Page Fault on x86 FS and another problem only showing up as I add more caches (e.g., a L2) and I am just curious about all kinds of x86

[gem5-dev] Cron <m5test@zizzer> /z/m5/regression/do-regression quick

* build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/linux/minor-timing: passed. * build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/linux/o3-timing: passed. * build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/linux/simple-atomic: passed. *