---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2667/#review5912
---
Not to be difficult, but is it possible for Sandia to just use the
binkert via gem5-dev
gem5-dev@gem5.org wrote:
I have a question. If you're trying to simulate a windows guest on a
linux
host. What are you doing with cygwin?
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 8:05 PM, mike upton via gem5-dev
gem5-dev@gem5.org
wrote:
I would like
I have a question. If you're trying to simulate a windows guest on a linux
host. What are you doing with cygwin?
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 8:05 PM, mike upton via gem5-dev gem5-dev@gem5.org
wrote:
I would like to get started on trying to simulate a windows x86 machine (on
top of a linux host).
Is the USE_KVM setting visible as a preprocessor directive in the C++? If
so, I could use that to set the kvm pointer to NULL if KVM is turned off
instead of getting it from the parameters. Then the question is how to
condition adding the KVM parameter to the python version of the device.
It actually is inserted into the map. Notice the type of bkpt. It is
actually a *reference* to a pointer. So, when bkpt is modified, it updates
the location in the map.
Nate
On Sat Nov 01 2014 at 10:44:53 PM He Hu via gem5-dev gem5-dev@gem5.org
wrote:
Hi developers,
In
I'm only somewhat following this thread, but I think that it's worth saying
that requiring protocols to actually get the data correct has one huge
benefit. It causes incorrect algorithms to produce incorrect answers.
Sometimes we want to allow shortcuts, but generally with modeling, it's
nice to
On Oct. 1, 2014, 11:37 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
Are the bool cast operators being used anywhere? It looks like you put
them in, but then do the 'ptr != nullptr' thing everywhere we need a bool,
so I'm wondering if they're useful.
How about replacing the cast operator with
On Oct. 1, 2014, 11:37 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
Are the bool cast operators being used anywhere? It looks like you put
them in, but then do the 'ptr != nullptr' thing everywhere we need a bool,
so I'm wondering if they're useful.
How about replacing the cast operator with
On Oct. 1, 2014, 11:37 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
Are the bool cast operators being used anywhere? It looks like you put
them in, but then do the 'ptr != nullptr' thing everywhere we need a bool,
so I'm wondering if they're useful.
How about replacing the cast operator with
On Oct. 1, 2014, 11:37 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
Are the bool cast operators being used anywhere? It looks like you put
them in, but then do the 'ptr != nullptr' thing everywhere we need a bool,
so I'm wondering if they're useful.
How about replacing the cast operator with
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2427/#review5376
---
Ship it!
Funny that we used to have one .hh and one .cc file and I move
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2425/#review5377
---
src/SConscript
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2425/#comment4874
Why not
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2456/#review5378
---
src/base/trace.cc
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2456/#comment4875
This
On Sept. 29, 2014, 1:19 p.m., Nathan Binkert wrote:
src/base/trace.cc, line 74
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2456/diff/1/?file=42022#file42022line74
default_logger may not be constructed during a static constructor
anymore, so if someone had log statements very early, things would
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2407/#review5341
---
Seems like you should try to get these changes approved upstream to make
06:21, nathan binkert via gem5-dev gem5-dev@gem5.org
wrote:
How often is the RNG used. Is it so bad to put a lock around it? If so,
can't you build a wrapper around the RNG that generates 1MB of random bits
at a time and then funnels those bits through a lock free queue?
Nate
On Sat
How often is the RNG used. Is it so bad to put a lock around it? If so,
can't you build a wrapper around the RNG that generates 1MB of random bits
at a time and then funnels those bits through a lock free queue?
Nate
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Nilay Vaish via gem5-dev
In practice, I don't know that there's any built-in support for
application
profiling in gem5 (am I forgetting something?). It wouldn't be too hard
to
add a periodic event that recorded the PC values of all the cores, which
would give you a first-level sampling of where time is being spent
18 matches
Mail list logo
