In general wouldn't you dynamic_cast the sender state pointer, and
couldn't you then check it for NULL? I suppose if the pointer's totally
wrong then you wouldn't know what would happen, but I think that's
unavoidable.
Gabe
Ali Saidi wrote:
We've been seeing a few of these type things lately.
This isn't all ready to check in and I need to hook up some disks, but tada!
m5 slave terminal: Terminal 0
Linux version 2.6.22.9 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2 (Gentoo
4.1.2)) #2 Mon Oct 8 13:13:00 PDT 2007
Command line: earlyprintk=ttyS0 console=ttyS0 lpj=9608015 ide0=noprobe
WOO!
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Gabe Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This isn't all ready to check in and I need to hook up some disks, but tada!
m5 slave terminal: Terminal 0
Linux version 2.6.22.9 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2 (Gentoo
4.1.2)) #2 Mon Oct 8 13:13:00
Awesome! Congratulations!
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Gabe Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This isn't all ready to check in and I need to hook up some disks, but tada!
m5 slave terminal: Terminal 0
Linux version 2.6.22.9 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2 (Gentoo
4.1.2))
Does anybody out there have a lot of experience with IDE drives are
supposed to hook up on an x86 machine? Our controller model looks very
much like what x86 uses, except that it's set up as a PCI device. It
looks like the IDE interfaces are expected to be at particular
addresses, and that
Alpha's root bridge is the Tsunami stuff. You're going to need to add
the equivalent for x86. I'm not sure about how the pci devices should
be set up (other than the bios does do that for you if you want to use
what it gives you), but you might want to fix the root bridge problem
to see if that
I think you're right. I looked at some of the entries under /proc on my
desktop (it's handy to actually work -in- x86 as well) and it looks like
the IO addresses used by the IDE controller are allocated to the AMD
south bridge which has a presence on the PCI bus. It looks like I'm
going to have to
And I just realized that my Intel system with an nvidia motherboard
thinks it has an AMD IDE controller. Weird.
Gabe
Gabe Black wrote:
I think you're right. I looked at some of the entries under /proc on my
desktop (it's handy to actually work -in- x86 as well) and it looks like
the IO
There's also plenty of documentation on the north bridge as well. I
should say that I suspect that there is not that much that you
technically have to implement to make linux happy. I also suggest
that you look at bochs to see what they do. to emulate all of this.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 11:06
