Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request: Ruby: Convert to M5 Stats

2011-05-31 Thread Korey Sewell
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/704/#review1292 --- src/mem/ruby/profiler/Profiler.hh

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request: Ruby: Convert to M5 Stats

2011-05-30 Thread Brad Beckmann
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/704/#review1291 --- I apologize it took me a while to review this code. Overall, my major

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request: Ruby: Convert to M5 Stats

2011-05-18 Thread Nathan Binkert
On 2011-05-17 12:13:18, Nathan Binkert wrote: src/mem/ruby/profiler/AddressProfiler.cc, line 235 http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/704/diff/1/?file=12593#file12593line235 .name should really have name() as part of the name. Is the AddressProfiler not a SimObject() ? Derek Hower

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request: Ruby: Convert to M5 Stats

2011-05-18 Thread Korey Sewell
On 2011-05-17 12:13:18, Nathan Binkert wrote: src/mem/ruby/profiler/Profiler.cc, line 456 http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/704/diff/1/?file=12599#file12599line456 How did you pick this magic number? Can we at least make it a constant that is defined in a header file with an

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request: Ruby: Convert to M5 Stats

2011-05-18 Thread Nathan Binkert
On 2011-05-17 12:13:18, Nathan Binkert wrote: src/mem/ruby/profiler/Profiler.cc, line 456 http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/704/diff/1/?file=12599#file12599line456 How did you pick this magic number? Can we at least make it a constant that is defined in a header file with an

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request: Ruby: Convert to M5 Stats

2011-05-18 Thread Korey Sewell
On 2011-05-17 12:13:18, Nathan Binkert wrote: src/mem/ruby/profiler/Profiler.cc, line 456 http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/704/diff/1/?file=12599#file12599line456 How did you pick this magic number? Can we at least make it a constant that is defined in a header file with an

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request: Ruby: Convert to M5 Stats

2011-05-18 Thread nathan binkert
I agree that makes sense in some instances, but I've found that when you do that, it makes it hard to extract stats that can compare to runs of different systems. For example, when I'm comparing stats across different systems, I want to easily compare how many times a coherency miss fell

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request: Ruby: Convert to M5 Stats

2011-05-17 Thread Nathan Binkert
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/704/#review1237 --- Overall, this is a good start. There are a couple of recurring themes

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request: Ruby: Convert to M5 Stats

2011-05-17 Thread nathan binkert
I had trouble getting my individual patches uploaded to review board (it said they were diffs?), so I merged them into one. You should ignore the first request that came through, as it is included below. In the future, it's best to use the reviewboard mercurial extension and use the command

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request: Ruby: Convert to M5 Stats

2011-05-17 Thread Korey Sewell
On 2011-05-17 12:13:18, Nathan Binkert wrote: src/mem/ruby/profiler/Profiler.cc, line 456 http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/704/diff/1/?file=12599#file12599line456 How did you pick this magic number? Can we at least make it a constant that is defined in a header file with an

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request: Ruby: Convert to M5 Stats

2011-05-17 Thread Korey Sewell
On 2011-05-17 12:13:18, Nathan Binkert wrote: src/mem/ruby/system/Sequencer.hh, line 174 http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/704/diff/1/?file=12604#file12604line174 Hmmm. More vectors of histograms. Can we make this an array instead? These histograms dynamically size. Does the default in

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request: Ruby: Convert to M5 Stats

2011-05-17 Thread nathan binkert
These histograms dynamically size. Does the default in M5 do the same? and using the same resizing algorithm? The histogram itself dynamically resizes, but the vector that's here doesn't need to be dynamic. Nate ___ gem5-dev mailing list