* build/ARM_SE/tests/fast/quick/00.hello/arm/linux/simple-atomic passed.
* build/X86_SE/tests/fast/quick/00.hello/x86/linux/simple-timing-ruby
passed.
* build/X86_SE/tests/fast/quick/00.hello/x86/linux/simple-atomic passed.
*
Hi.
I want to implement some missing instructions in x86 part of M5 simulator.
I was looking in the code:
one_byte_opcodes.isa
two_type_opcodes.isa
There is one thing that I don't understand.
The instructions are defined in at least 3 different ways:
1. 0x7: Inst::XORPD(Vq,Wq); /*
Thanks for your interest. The following wiki pages should give you more
background on what's going on.
This is a page about ISA descriptions in general and should answer your
specific question.
http://m5sim.org/wiki/index.php/ISA_description_system
These are pages about different aspects of
How difficult would it be to generate a visual graph of the simboject
heirarchy from within a config script? It might look something like
Simulation.graph() similar to Simulation.run(...). I'm thinking
that might be a good sanity check if someone wanted to make sure their
simulation was
How difficult would it be to generate a visual graph of the simboject
heirarchy from within a config script? It might look something like
Simulation.graph() similar to Simulation.run(...). I'm thinking
that might be a good sanity check if someone wanted to make sure their
simulation was
