[m5-dev] changeset in m5: getopt: Remove GPL code.

2011-02-26 Thread Nathan Binkert
changeset baf4b5f6782e in /z/repo/m5 details: http://repo.m5sim.org/m5?cmd=changeset;node=baf4b5f6782e description: getopt: Remove GPL code. This code is unused and should never have been committed diffstat: src/mem/ruby/tester/SConscript|1 - src/mem/ruby/tester/geto

Re: [m5-dev] Review Request: Main: Create long talked about output-conference-paper option.

2011-02-26 Thread Nathan Binkert
> On 2011-02-26 17:09:28, Nathan Binkert wrote: > > Perhaps we should make this the top of --help. How about this as an > > alternate implementation for --output-conference-paper > > > > import os > > import urllib > > import webbrowser > > > > try: > > import pwd > > uname = os.getlo

Re: [m5-dev] Review Request: Main: Create long talked about output-conference-paper option.

2011-02-26 Thread Nathan Binkert
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/516/#review910 --- Ship it! Perhaps we should make this the top of --help. How about this a

Re: [m5-dev] Review Request: O3: Send instruction back to fetch on squash to seed predecoder correctly.

2011-02-26 Thread Gabe Black
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/511/#review909 --- I see what you're doing here, I think. For the strategy your taking your

Re: [m5-dev] Review Request: O3: Cleanup the commitInfo comm struct.

2011-02-26 Thread Gabe Black
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/510/#review908 --- I don't see anything obviously wrong here, although I'm sure it wouldn't b

Re: [m5-dev] Functional Access support in Ruby

2011-02-26 Thread Nilay Vaish
Brad, I don't recall if talked about the following situtation on Tuesday -- suppose we have a functional access for an address A. Further assume that the corresponding cache block is in base state in all the caches (if present). But there is timing access to this block which is currently in s

Re: [m5-dev] Review Request: O3: Implement memory mapped IPRs for O3.

2011-02-26 Thread Gabe Black
While trying to fix another problem, I reworked the load part of this to look more like a load satisfied by store to load forwarding than one that came back from the memory system. It didn't turn out to be necessary to fix what I was working on, but I like this version better since it's simpler and

Re: [m5-dev] Review Request: O3: Implement memory mapped IPRs for O3.

2011-02-26 Thread Gabe Black
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/502/ --- (Updated 2011-02-26 16:31:51.117900) Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Bl

Re: [m5-dev] Review Request: X86: Use regular read requests in the walker instead of read exclusive.

2011-02-26 Thread Gabe Black
> On 2011-02-26 08:36:58, Steve Reinhardt wrote: > > I won't vouch for the surrounding code (I don't get the difference between > > the oldRead, read, and write packets, for starters), but this one specific > > line that's changed looks good to me :-) oldRead is the read that just returned dat

Re: [m5-dev] Review Request: X86: Use regular read requests in the walker instead of read exclusive.

2011-02-26 Thread Gabe Black
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/514/ --- (Updated 2011-02-26 16:21:29.974813) Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Bl

Re: [m5-dev] Functional Access support in Ruby

2011-02-26 Thread Nilay Vaish
I am talking about real silicon. Then, how does gdb makes changes to values of variables? Nilay On Sat, 26 Feb 2011, Beckmann, Brad wrote: Hi Nilay, What exactly are you referring to as the "underlying processor"? Are you referring to real silicon? Actual hardware doesn't support functio

Re: [m5-dev] Review Request: Main: Create long talked about output-conference-paper option.

2011-02-26 Thread Thomas Wenisch
I was extremely excited about this new option till I discovered it only printed out help text... Ali, why can't you implement it properly? It doesn't even need to work in general, just for the configurations I care to run. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 26, 2011, at 4:25 PM, "Gabe Black" wrote:

Re: [m5-dev] Functional Access support in Ruby

2011-02-26 Thread Beckmann, Brad
Hi Nilay, What exactly are you referring to as the "underlying processor"? Are you referring to real silicon? Actual hardware doesn't support functional accesses. Functional accesses are unique to gem5 and are completely fake when compared to actual hardware. gem5 could support functional a

Re: [m5-dev] Review Request: Main: Create long talked about output-conference-paper option.

2011-02-26 Thread Gabe Black
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/516/#review906 --- Yeah, lets not. I don't think those users will get or appreciate an inside

[m5-dev] Review Request: Main: Create long talked about output-conference-paper option.

2011-02-26 Thread Ali Saidi
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/516/ --- Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and Nathan Binke

Re: [m5-dev] Functional Access support in Ruby

2011-02-26 Thread Nilay Vaish
I was thinking about the behavior of functional accesses. Currently in gdb we can change the value of a program variable. Does that mean the underlying processor supports functional accesses? If yes, then we should already have some knowledge about what is expected from functional accesses. N

Re: [m5-dev] Review Request: X86: Use regular read requests in the walker instead of read exclusive.

2011-02-26 Thread Steve Reinhardt
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/514/#review905 --- Ship it! I won't vouch for the surrounding code (I don't get the differen

[m5-dev] Review Request: X86: If PCI config space is disabled, pass through to regular IO addresses.

2011-02-26 Thread Gabe Black
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/515/ --- Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and Nathan Binke

[m5-dev] Review Request: X86: Use regular read requests in the walker instead of read exclusive.

2011-02-26 Thread Gabe Black
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/514/ --- Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and Nathan Binke

[m5-dev] Cron /z/m5/regression/do-regression quick

2011-02-26 Thread Cron Daemon
* build/ALPHA_SE/tests/fast/quick/00.hello/alpha/linux/simple-atomic passed. * build/ALPHA_SE/tests/fast/quick/30.eio-mp/alpha/eio/simple-atomic-mp passed. * build/ALPHA_SE/tests/fast/quick/00.hello/alpha/tru64/o3-timing passed. * build/ALPHA_SE/tests/fast/quick/00.hello/alpha/linu