Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request: Config: Add support for a Self.all proxy object

2011-05-26 Thread Gabe Black
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/720/#review1262 --- What does Self.all do? What is it for? You have one use in the change so

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request: O3: Create a pipeline activity viewer for the O3 CPU model.

2011-05-26 Thread Gabe Black
That does look nice. It can be a lot of work slogging through O3 trace output to figure out what's going on, and I expect this to make that a lot easier. I glanced through the code and didn't see anything particularly objectionable, although I wouldn't necessarily consider that a thorough review :-

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request: O3: Create a pipeline activity viewer for the O3 CPU model.

2011-05-26 Thread Steve Reinhardt
Cool! I haven't looked at the code yet, but the output looks nice. Steve On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Ali Saidi wrote: > Anyone that is curious what this looks like... lets try the picture again... > > > > > Ali > > On May 26, 2011, at 9:19 PM, Ali Saidi wrote: > >> >> -

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request: O3: Create a pipeline activity viewer for the O3 CPU model.

2011-05-26 Thread Ali Saidi
Anyone that is curious what this looks like: Ali On May 26, 2011, at 9:19 PM, Ali Saidi wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/721/ > -

[gem5-dev] Review Request: O3: Create a pipeline activity viewer for the O3 CPU model.

2011-05-26 Thread Ali Saidi
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/721/ --- Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and Nathan Binke

[gem5-dev] Review Request: Config: Add support for a Self.all proxy object

2011-05-26 Thread Ali Saidi
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/720/ --- Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and Nathan Binke

Re: [gem5-dev] [m5-dev] Review Request: Ruby: Correctly set access permissions for directory entries

2011-05-26 Thread Nilay Vaish
On Fri, 6 May 2011, Beckmann, Brad wrote: Hi Nilay, Yeah, pulling the State into the Machine makes sense to me. If I recall, my previous patch made it necessary that each machine included a state_declaration (previously the state enum). More tightly integrating the state to the machine see

[gem5-dev] Cron /z/m5/regression/do-regression quick

2011-05-26 Thread Cron Daemon
scons: `build/ALPHA_SE/m5.debug' is up to date. scons: `build/ALPHA_SE_MOESI_hammer/m5.debug' is up to date. scons: `build/ALPHA_SE_MESI_CMP_directory/m5.debug' is up to date. scons: `build/ALPHA_SE_MOESI_CMP_directory/m5.debug' is up to date. scons: `build/ALPHA_SE_MOESI_CMP_token/m5.debug' is up