That will happen automatically tonight (the Sat night/Sun AM
regression runs with the --scratch flag, see /etc/cron.d/m5).
Steve
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Nilay Vaish wrote:
> Will clearing all the existing builds and starting afresh remove this issue?
> Can some one do this?
>
> --
> Nil
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/736/
---
Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and Nathan
Binke
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/735/
---
Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and Nathan
Binke
Will clearing all the existing builds and starting afresh remove this
issue? Can some one do this?
--
Nilay
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011, Steve Reinhardt wrote:
It seems very strange... like at a high level it thinks there's a
cycle, but when it goes to print out where it is it can't find one.
I've nev
It seems very strange... like at a high level it thinks there's a
cycle, but when it goes to print out where it is it can't find one.
I've never seen this myself; I wonder if it's a bug in the version of
scons on zizzer (v0.98), as the machine I use has v.1.2.0.
It is a little strange that we're b
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Gabe Black wrote:
> To clarify, is this signed/unsigned issue something we need to deal with
> before this patch goes in, or can it be dealt with separately later?
I'd like to see it handled before the patch is committed, mostly
because I'm still not 100% convinced
Does any one has any idea what a dependency cycles is? This is what
zizzer's log has.
scons: *** Found dependency cycle(s):
Internal Error: no cycle found for node
build/ALPHA_SE/params/L1Cache_Controller.hh (at 0x412a680>) in state up_to_date
Internal Error: no cycle found for node
build/AL
On 05/31/11 00:13, Gabe Black wrote:
> On 05/30/11 21:57, Steve Reinhardt wrote:
>> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Gabe Black wrote:
>>> On 05/30/11 09:47, Steve Reinhardt wrote:
Anyway, it seems very odd to have to say "(int8_t)Mem.ub" when we already
have a ".sb" operand type define
scons: *** Found dependency cycle(s):
* build/ALPHA_SE/tests/opt/quick/00.hello/alpha/linux/o3-timing passed.
* build/ALPHA_SE/tests/opt/quick/00.hello/alpha/linux/simple-timing passed.
* build/ALPHA_SE/tests/opt/quick/00.hello/alpha/tru64/simple-atomic passed.
* build/ALPHA_SE/test