Brad, this patch to affects the number of ticks required
for performing a particular number of loads. I don't expect such a thing
to happen. Do you?
--
Nilay
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, Brad Beckmann wrote:
---
This is an automatically
I realized the reason for this. Actually, the wakeup function performs a
round-robin scheduling between the incoming links. This code had moved
inside the a new if condition that has been introduced in the code. I have
moved that code before the if condition so that the timing remains same as
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/328/#review839
---
Overall, this looks great. A pretty simple change that offers
On 2011-02-09 09:44:20, Brad Beckmann wrote:
src/mem/ruby/buffers/MessageBuffer.cc, line 234
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/328/diff/2/?file=10257#file10257line234
Is there a reason why you want to pass the message pointer instead of
just the vnet id?
I would change that. It is a
One simple nitpick before you commit is to fix the commit message so you put
a proper summary line.
Nate
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Nilay Vaish ni...@cs.wisc.edu wrote:
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/328/
Review request for
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, nathan binkert wrote:
One simple nitpick before you commit is to fix the commit message so you put
a proper summary line.
Nate
What would you like it to be?
___
m5-dev mailing list
m5-dev@m5sim.org
One simple nitpick before you commit is to fix the commit message so you
put
a proper summary line.
Nate
What would you like it to be?
Whatever you want. Remember that it's supposed to be a single
descriptive word followed by a single line summary describing the
commit. It's described
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/328/
---
Review request for Default.
Summary
---
Currently the wakeup function for the
